That doesn't explain a few things that continue to puzzle me about this.
As I reported, in the very beginning, this was originally reported as a hostage situation rather than a gunman run amuck.
And then there's this..eyewitnesses inside the Temple who continue to claim there were 4 shooters, not just one:
This is the statement of Amardeep Kaleka, son of the president of the Sikh Temple who 's father was murdered that day:
The most that I know right now is that there were multiple shooters…multiple people. It was a very well coordinated thing. It wasn’t haphazard
A number of other people have stated there was more than one shooter.
Not only that, but after Michael Wade Page was shot and killed outside the temple by one police officer, the SWAT team delayed going in for quite some time. Who did they think was still in the temple? Was it simply an honest mistake based on earlier reports of a hostage situation, or did they know something they're not telling us?
Something that doesn't jibe with the narrative of one psycho gunman?