tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post1950953231554015805..comments2024-02-29T02:10:56.878-08:00Comments on J O S H U A P U N D I T: Netanyahu Refuses UN Call For Renewed Building Freeze; Hundreds Of Homes In Shiloh ApprovedFreedom Fighterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13649470110087808596noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-56664280597217384252012-02-23T18:03:10.830-08:002012-02-23T18:03:10.830-08:00Hopefully there will be more like this.Hopefully there will be more like this.Israeli Jewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-4379287936318034102012-02-23T06:36:33.062-08:002012-02-23T06:36:33.062-08:00"Let a thousand bulldozers bloom." Agre..."Let a thousand bulldozers bloom." Agree wholeheartedly!! This is the land of the Jewish people by divine decree. As such, they should build on it. <br /><br />If anyone should try and rip this from them, it should be understood that there will be dire consequences for that individual or individuals who would try such things. I'd suspect that there would be consequences to any Israeli who would try to negotiate any of this land away in exchange for "peace" or whatever. Now if Isrealis should choose to do this, this is their business between them and God. This is really not our business nor is it the business of the UN.<br /><br />By the way a nation state cannot remain viable unless in the long run unless it has defensible borders and is willing and able to defend those borders. The proposed two state solution, as the UN, the US, and others seem to want to implement it right now would leave Israel virtually defenseless in a conventional sense. <br /><br />This would mean Israel would be more likely to need to resort to the use of nuclear weapons at an earlier stage than at present should the need arise to defend their homeland. Ohter parties in the region would know this. As such, they are going to be much more likely to develop their own nuclear arsenals. Essentially the two state solution as currently proposed would lead to greater nuclear proliferation. This is something we claim to want to prevent!!<br /><br />"Ban had nothing to say about Palestinian construction in the area". "Robert Serry called the Israeli announcement 'deplorable' and said it "moves us further away from the goal of a two state solution." These two statements are uttlerly ridiculous. We claim to want a two state solution yet nothing is said about Palestinian encroachments on disputed territory and nothing is said about Palestinian incitment agaisnt Jews or the rewarding of terrorist soldiers by the Pslestinian leadership. <br /><br />If we truly want what we claim to want which is a viable two state solution, then the unconditional support of the Palestinians by the Americans, the EU, the UN and others must end. At the very least any aid and support for them must be based upon very stringent conditions much like the aid Israel receives from the US is. By either cutting this aid off or making it conditional this would place the parties on a more equal footing. <br /><br />When the parties are on a more equal footing, the Palestinians are much more likely to feel the desire to enter into good faith negotiations with Israel to achieve the so called two state solution.<br /><br />By making the statements that Mr. Ban and Mr. Sperry made these men are either lying, allowing themselves to directed by ideology rather than the facts of the situation, or both. In any event, not a good situation. When faced with such a sitution, Israel should, as you say, "let a thousand bulldozers bloom."B.Posternoreply@blogger.com