tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post4704660572000062621..comments2024-02-29T02:10:56.878-08:00Comments on J O S H U A P U N D I T: Mitt Romney Sails To Victory In NH, And Has A Few Things To SayFreedom Fighterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13649470110087808596noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-64232840245718464682012-01-12T08:32:05.171-08:002012-01-12T08:32:05.171-08:00For the most part, the Republican party has ignore...For the most part, the Republican party has ignored Ron Paul. "High level-Republicans and the more rabid strand of Zionists" have their attention focused elsewhere. Dr. Paul is simply not as important as some of his supporters seem to think he is. Does the candidate have the same inflated opinion of himself that his supporters seem to have of him? It would not surprise me if this is so. With the possible exception of Mr. Obama Dr. Paul is the most arrogant person in politics today. <br /><br />Dirty politics have been part of things for a long time. With the control of the news media, the public education system grades K-12, the proferssorships, management, and administration of the major universities, the labor unions, the entire government beuracracy on the federal and state levels which includes but is not limited to the EPA, OSHA, the National Labor Relations Board, EEOC, Dept of Energy, the IRS, the FBI, the State Dept, and the CIA the Democrats have bit more resources to play this "game" than the Republicans do and are consequently much better at it. <br /><br />Since all of the aforementioned groups are in love with Dr. Paul's foreign policy, he has benefited more from so called "dirty politics" than any other Republican currently in the race. Also, he has received more assistance from Mr. Obama's supporters than any other Republican candidate running. This means even more access to the Democrat party machine. <br /><br />Every school child above 9 is aware of the narative you present on Pearl Harbor. The truth is likel much more complicated. Also, the US had virtually no military capabilities of any significance prior to WWII. Had Japan followed up Pearl Harbor with any kind of competence in terms of military planning they'd have easily crushed the United States before its industrial capabilities could have even gotten started on building the kind of military needed to fight a global war. It seems rather dumb to pick a fight with an enemy who is far stronger than you. To assume that FDR and his advisors were that dumb seems rather extrodinary. Extrodinary claims require extrodinary truth. Of course a dumbed down American pulbic does not think throgh these things. <br /><br />If Obama wants to get reelected the last thing he wants is another Pearl Harbor in the Straits. Such an event would lead to war with Iran and it would lead to a MASSIVE rise in gas prices. If this happened, Obama would be virtually handing the election to his Repubican challenger. What you really need to be worrying about is Iran trying to provoke things as an excuse to go to war with US. Essentially we need to be worrying about an Iranian attack on the US and not an American attack on Iran. The media and other talking head pundits have this all bassackwards. <br /><br />Clearly since we haven't taken the necessary steps to become self sufficient in our oil supplies and even if we began right now it would take some time to either achieve this or to at the very least gain some leverage over our suppliers in negotiations we have to take steps to ensure the strait remains open. As such, this likely means maintaining some type of prescense there which gives the Iranians opportunities to provoke something giving them an excuse to attack America. Extreme good judgement will need to be used. Far from trying to provoke a Pearl Harbor type attack Mr. Obama and his team are tyring to prevent one as they want to be reelected. What we really need to be concerned about is an Iranian attack on America not vice versa. <br /><br />As for trying to destroy Rand's political career, he's not significant enough to the RNC to warrant such focus right now. Even if they attempted to do so it would be pointless and cause more harm to them than good. If he is destroyed politically there would just be 10, 20, or more to replace him. The same goes for Dr. Paul.B.Posternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-6102856782716791412012-01-11T11:15:27.697-08:002012-01-11T11:15:27.697-08:00Ah yes, always the JOOOS with you,isn't it?
R...Ah yes, always the JOOOS with you,isn't it?<br /><br />Ron Paul is getting money and logistical help from the Obama Campaign in the hopes he will go third party and pull in enough votes to throw the election to Obama.<br /><br />No matter what you think you're voting for, you're merely a sheep being used to put Obama in for a second term. <br /><br />Think about it.Robhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13332213651195340500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-80935702655740808482012-01-11T10:30:07.112-08:002012-01-11T10:30:07.112-08:00High-level Republicans and probably the more rabid...High-level Republicans and probably the more rabid strand of Zionists are threatening Ron Paul not to run independent or they'll ruin Rand's fledgling career.<br /><br />But that's the kind of dirty politics the Elite has played for many decades.<br /><br />All the way back to FDR goading and twisting economic strings on Japan.<br /><br />Like O is doing to Iran, hoping that another Pearl Harbor can be stirred on the Straits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-8595838024719736692012-01-11T06:36:09.559-08:002012-01-11T06:36:09.559-08:00Obama continues to surround himself with Wall St. ...Obama continues to surround himself with Wall St. predators. Jamie Dimon would offshore his mother if it would save him a few bucks on Christmas cards. GE's Jeff Immelt as the Jobs Czar. Turbo Tax Tim Geithner. It seems 1/2 his advisers have worked for Goldman Sachs. Now he's appointing Lew, a guy who made millions on the backs of Fannie and Freddie at a hedge fund, as his new chief of staff.<br /><br />Yet Obama pays lip service to Occupy Wall Street and the "99%". With leftists facts are trumped by narratives, and nobody has proven that more than our current president. He is epitomizes crony capitalism more than any president since the Harding administration's involvement with TeaPot Dome.<br /><br />Romney has to point this out while explaining Bain. And he will explain Bain because he fits the narrative of the Democrats for this election. <br /><br />But we shouldn't kid ourselves. Anyone we Republicans would nominate would be called right wing extremist and a Wall St. tool by the Dems. That's politics, so it behooves us to find someone who can counter those attacks the best and go on the offensive. After 3 years of mismanagement in the White House and another 2 by a Dem controlled Congress, there's plenty of ammo for us to use.Scott Kirwinhttp://www.therazor.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-71243394521733196292012-01-11T00:25:18.748-08:002012-01-11T00:25:18.748-08:00Hi Louie,
If Sarah Palin feels that way, maybe she...Hi Louie,<br />If Sarah Palin feels that way, maybe she should have run herself dammit instead of bitching and complaining.<br /><br />Fine. I agree Romney isn't the perfect candidate. But are any of the others better?<br /><br />Gingrich is a loose cannon who's a TR-style progressive (his words), Ron Paul is an isolationist anti-semitic lunatic, Santorum is a big government conservative who will alienate people with his socialCon views, lacks smarts on foreign policy and has shown he lacks the executive ability to put together an effective campaign staff as of yet.<br /><br />Ditto with Rick Perry on all counts,plus Perry's stance on illegal aliens. Obama would decimate Perry or Santorum in a debate.<br /><br />So tell me Louie, who do you like better? Weeekend Monkey? Should we draft him?<br /><br />Another thing Rush said,BTW is that he was plenty ticked off at all the anti-Capitalist rhetoric coming out of the mouths of the various anti-Romneys. He's damned right about that.<br /><br />That also explains why the Obama campaign isn't attacking Romney very much..or any of the others lately,if you notice. It's because the GOP candidates are doing the work for them, and because I'm convinced their ultimate strategy is to get Paul to go third party and siphon off enough votes for Obama to get in for term II.<br /><br />This is the field - to paraphrase Don Rumsfeld,you wage an election with the candidates you have, not the candidates you wish you had.<br /><br />Like it or not,Romney is the most accomplished candidate so far who has the qualifications and experience to do the job and a decent shot at winning.<br /><br />If you feel it's someone else who's currently running , I'm all ears.<br /><br />Regards,<br />RobRobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13332213651195340500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-55498680817349838292012-01-10T21:40:18.004-08:002012-01-10T21:40:18.004-08:00yeah but .........
On his radio show Monday, Rush...yeah but .........<br /><br />On his radio show Monday, Rush Limbaugh concurred with Palin 100%:<br /><br /> There is a story on the Drudge Report today from Sarah Palin in which Sarah Palin says that the White House wants Mitt Romney to be the Republican nominee. Now, not only did I tell you that the Broncos were gonna beat the Steelers, for months I have been telling you that the Democrats want Romney — and you all know it. You’ve been listening here and you’ve heard people call me and tell me I don’t know what I’m talking about, that I’m full of it, that they’re scared of Romney. “Romney is the only guy who can win.” And I have said, “No,” and I’ve stood tough, and I’ve said, “They can’t wait for him. What’s Occupy Wall Street all about but running against Romney? He’s the Wall Street guy on our roster — and then Romneycare,” and I’ve laid it all out. So here comes Palin, she says it, and makes news.<br /><br /><br />Moreover, Rush insightfully added the fact Democrats, who are rightly characterized by trying to destroy everybody they fear, have not tried to destroy Romney: ”You can start with Sarah Palin, you can move on to Santorum. Any — any conservative who showed any interest — the Democrats set out to destroy. [And that’s how we know] who they’re genuinely afraid of.” Note, however: “They are not hammering Mitt Romney at all.”louielouienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-39903372249751203892012-01-10T20:19:33.043-08:002012-01-10T20:19:33.043-08:00Hi Scott.
As you know,my preferred candidate deci...Hi Scott.<br /><br />As you know,my preferred candidate decided to sit things out in Wasilla.<br /><br />But to me, a big part of what this election is going to be about ( and I said it a long time ago) is competence.<br /><br />Bain doesn't particularly trouble me, because when you create economic activity,it can't help but be spread around since all you can do with money is invest it or buy goods and services with it. provided large corporations operate according to law,they create economic activity that ultimately gets spread around. <br /><br />The story with Bain is not the people that got fired - those tweaks are inevitable - but how many businesses and jobs were crated, and the economic activity those businesses created that created other jobs. <br /><br />Anyway, that's how I see it.<br /><br />Regards,<br />RobRobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13332213651195340500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-74023754327332809952012-01-10T19:25:17.382-08:002012-01-10T19:25:17.382-08:00Bain troubles me. I'll admit that at heart I&#...Bain troubles me. I'll admit that at heart I'm a populist with a deep, almost instinctive distrust of large corporations. While I agree that he will be light-years ahead of our current president in talent and ideas, Bain continues to tarnish him.Scott Kirwinhttp://www.therazor.orgnoreply@blogger.com