tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post4693479739171187427..comments2024-02-29T02:10:56.878-08:00Comments on J O S H U A P U N D I T: Pat Buchanan, Hitler's American ApologistFreedom Fighterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13649470110087808596noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16816866.post-24576046275563631902009-09-04T10:09:30.037-07:002009-09-04T10:09:30.037-07:00This may be a bit off topic but recently there has...This may be a bit off topic but recently there has been much talk about how Israel stole the land from the Palestinians and essentially how Israel exists on "stolen land" and as such the state should be dismantled. I have to say I don't like the precedent that would set. After all, aren't most if not all nations of the world located on land that someone else once lived on. The current inhabitants of all lands pretty much either took it by force or the previous inhabitants moved on or some combination. <br /><br />If Israel is forced to give back land that it won in armed conflict, what kind of a precedent does this set. Will America next be forced to give back land it took from Mexico during the Mexican/American War? Will America be forced to give back land that was once lived on by the American Indian? Will Russia be forced to give back land that it gained during the reign of the Czars to the people who once lived there?<br /><br />I know I for one DO NOT think America should give back land to Mexico or the American Indians. If Israel is forced to surrender land based upon this precedent, where will it need? Probably America would be the next target, meaning it would be forced to give up land that it currently has. <br /><br />Who comes after Israel and America? Who is the next target? I'm not sure right now. Perhaps it will be Canada. After American Indians once lived in Canada, as I understand. The nations of earth might want to think carefully before they start setting precedents like this.B.Posternoreply@blogger.com