I suppose I shouldn't be too surprised, but it's truly astonishing how deep most of the dinosaur media's collective head is inside Barack Hussein Obama's posterior. If he makes a left turn without signaling, there are going to be a lot of broken necks!
A case in point is New York Times 'journalist' Larry Rother, who tries to spin the fact that an Obama presidency is looked on with glee by a number of America's worst enemies,that Obama advocates unconditional Chamberlain-like negotiations with them and that Gop nominee Senator McCain is a real creep for bringing all this up:
But important nuances appear to have been lost in the partisan salvos, particularly on Mr. McCain’s side. An examination of Mr. Obama’s numerous public statements on the subjects indicates that he has consistently condemned Hamas as a “terrorist organization,” has not sought the group’s support and does not advocate immediate, direct or unconditional negotiations with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president. {...}
Susan E. Rice, a former State Department and National Security Council official who is a foreign policy adviser to the Democratic candidate, said that “for political purposes, Senator Obama’s opponents on the right have distorted and reframed” his views. Mr. McCain and his surrogates have repeatedly stated that Mr. Obama would be willing to meet “unconditionally” with Mr. Ahmadinejad. But Dr. Rice said that this was not the case for Iran or any other so-called “rogue” state. Mr. Obama believes “that engagement at the presidential level, at the appropriate time and with the appropriate preparation, can be used to leverage the change we need,” Dr. Rice said. “But nobody said he would initiate contacts at the presidential level; that requires due preparation and advance work.”
Notice the quote marks around "terrorist organization". I bet it took this tool a whole hour of agonizing thought and a conference with his editor before even daring to use that phrase in the same sentence with Hamas.
Actually, McCain said nothing that would insinuate that Jesus II is a Hamas supporter. What he is saying is that there is a good reason that Hamas, Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez,the al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigade, FARC,Syria and a whole host of other people who are enemies of the US are absolutely salivating at the idea of an Obama presidency:
"I think it's very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States. So apparently has Danny Ortega and several others. I think that people should understand that I will be Hamas's worst nightmare....If Senator Obama is favored by Hamas I think people can make judgments accordingly."
So,who's lying? Let's see what Jesus II actually had to say about negotiating with rogue states and terrorists...from the Democrat debate.
Oh,and there's also this bit, from the Chosen One's own website:
Ummmm....pass the waffles?
hat tip to Allah, Wolf and Charles at LGF
Hey FF, great post! You're absolutely right, the MSM desperately wants people to believe that these "unsought" endorsements by Hamas and other groups unfriendly to America are purely coincidental and have nothing whatsoever to do with Obama's postions on the issues. And September 11 had nothing to do with jets hitting buildings...
ReplyDelete