Believe it or not. Apparently there's some stuff even Liberal Jews won't eat:
From an April 14th , 2010 national poll of Jewish voters by McLaughlin & Associates...
MEMORANDUM
To: Interested Parties
From: John McLaughlin
Re: National Survey of Jewish Voters
Date: April 14, 2010
________________________________________________________________________
Major Findings:
I. A plurality of Jewish voters would consider someone else for President.
According to the 2008 exit polls, Barack Obama won 78% to 21% among Jewish voters. Now, in the second year of Obama’s presidency, only 42% of voters would re-elect him, while the plurality (46%) would consider voting for someone else.
Would you vote to re-elect Barack Obama as President or would you consider voting for someone else?
Total
Re-Elect 42
Someone Else 46
Don’t Know/Refused 12
II. A significant portion of Jewish voters disapprove of the President’s handling of relations with Israel.
Nearly four in ten Jewish voters (39%) disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing handling America’s relations with Israel. This rating is not good for a group of voters who are 59% Democratic to only 16% Republican.
Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing handling America’s relations with Israel?
Total
Approve 50
Disapprove 39
Don’t Know/Refused 11
III. Jewish voters do not support President Obama’s plan to recognize a Palestinian state.
The majority of voters (52%) disapproves of the Obama Administration supporting a plan to recognize a Palestinian state within two years. The majority of voters (64%) says that Jerusalem should remain the undivided capital of Israel, while only 13% say that the
United States should force Israel to give up parts of Jerusalem to the Palestinians. Six in ten voters (62%) say that the Palestinians would continue their campaign of terror to destroy Israel if they were given a Palestinian state, while only 19% say they would live peacefully with Israel. More than seven in ten voters (73%) say Israel is right to insist upon the Palestinians accepting Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state before there are any negotiations about a Palestinian state.
________________________________________________________________
Do you approve or disapprove of the Obama Administration supporting a plan to recognize a Palestinian state within 2-years regardless of whether or not Israel agrees?
Total
Approve 28
Disapprove 52
Don’t Know/Refused 19
Should Jerusalem remain the undivided capital of Israel or should the United States force Israel to give parts of Jerusalem, including Christian and Jewish holy sites, to the Palestinians?
Total
Undivided Capital 64
Parts to Palestinians 13
Don’t Know/Refused 23
Do you think that if the Palestinians were given their own state in the West Bank, part of Jerusalem, and Gaza they would live peacefully with Israel or continue their campaign of terror to destroy Israel?
Total
Live Peacefully 19
Continue Terror 62
Don’t Know/Refused 19
The leaders of Palestine have refused to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Is Israel right to insist upon the Palestinians accepting Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state before there are any negotiations about a Palestinian state?
Total
Yes 73
No 15
Don’t Know/Refused 12
Methodology:
McLaughlin & Associates conducted a national survey of 600 likely Jewish voters on April 7th and 8th, 2010. All interviews were conducted via telephone by professional interviewers. Respondents were randomly selected within predetermined geographic units structured to correlate with actual voter turnout. The survey of 600 likely Jewish voters has an accuracy of +/- 4.0% at a 95% confidence interval.
Seems like some people are finally waking up.....
there is a website i frequent. the webhost is joo. lives in los angeles. i sometimes use him to confirm stuff i get from other people. sort of a snopes, but more accurate and trustworthy. i often send the webhost e-mails questioning the polling numbers of hussein. he always cautions me about polls, as he has said he can turn a polling question around so that hussein would get over a 90% approval rating.
ReplyDeletesometimes the webhost has this chimpanzie write a guest column commenting on politics.
can you believe it?
a chimpanzie.
i digress.
while this survey addresses issues central to the jooish way of life, the key point for myself/gentile in this survey is the first question. i re-read it, and re-read it, and re-; you get the point. and what i got, is what i got the first time i read the question.
46% of the joos would "consider" someone else for president.
so who are they gonna "consider"?
hussein is going to be the dimocratic nominee for the next thirty years.
who are they gonna consider?
as the numbers say 42% still think he's ok.
so.
if the other 46% don't have anyone else to consider, and just half of them go crawling back to hussein, that gives him 65% easy money.
2:1 as the chimp at that other web-site would say.
going back to who the joos would consider, i hope ff doesn't mean that the joos would consider voting for some one from another political party?
i mean really.
the joos have been in lock step with the dimocratics since ......., well, .......... that doesn't matter.
the way i see it, nothing much has changed, and these numbers can verify that.
12% refused.
if hussein gets half of them and the 23% considering whatever, and the 42% he has, and he is not far from where he was. and this is just a poll. there is no election in sight.
just wait until he gets in election mode. he'll travel to israel, if it's still there, put his arm around shimon and walk through some garden somewhere with all the press cameras clicking away behind them. and when he leaves, all will be right.
again.
there is one other thing i wanted to say. it's about hair, and joos, and a sack. but i can't think of how i want to phrase it right now.
oh well, even looking at this survey, i'm still in a cheery mode this evening. there's a movie on the internet channel i watch. THE PIANIST i like music, so i think i'll go check it out.
So far Eric Cantor is the only Jewish member of Congress to stand up to Obama's Israel-bashing. I would vote for a Christian Republican over a Jewish Dem any day.
ReplyDeleteHi Louie,
ReplyDeleteUmmm, first of all, please don't let Weekend Monkey ever here you refer to him as a 'chimpanzee'. Chimps are apes and as Weekend Monkey would be the first to tell you, he's all monkey, IYKWIMAITYD.
RE: the Jewish vote, you're right, this is early days but I think Obama has gone pretty far over the ledge here. There's something almost psychotic about it.
One of my notorious Little Birdies who ought to know tells me that there are a number of influential Jewish Dems and donors who are pretty livid about Obama's nonsense and have expressed the same in his presence.
They will not be there in 2012 unless Sheik Nasrullah of Hezbollah is running on the GOP ticket.
That said, you're right..it's early days and the percentage of the Jewish vote is going to be very dependent on who runs against him.
But I doubt he's going to get much more than 60% of the Jewish vote no matter what..in fact, I see him doing somewhat worse than Carter in 1980, who ended up with support in the 50's vs. Ronald Reagan.
Nor,if I'm right about what's coming is Zero going to be able to do a photo-op in Israel, where his approval rating is around 4%. Even Shimon Peres is not that suicidal.
Hi M I agree with you,but realize that there's a lot going on behind the scenes. Or so I hear.
Regards,
Rob
FYI, by 'in his presence' I mean in my source's presence,not Obama's.
ReplyDeleteRob
For your reading pleasure i recommend Spengler, aka David Goldman's essay in "First Things".
ReplyDeleteRan across it this morning and was going to post on the Obama Question in Israel, but got side-tracked by a Tea Party...
The Jewish Tripwire...
He's using his Spengler nic, instead of his assistant editor real name, but it's the same old intrepid Spengler...
Hi Dymphna,
ReplyDeleteSo David is hearing some of the same stuff..interesting.
Let's hope the Jews finally get a clue.
Regards,
Rob
roflmao
ReplyDeletethanks for the typo correction.
in all seriousness though, and i don't mean to get personal on your website, and it is presumptuous of me to say i speak for all of us.
but i don't/can't imagine what monkey boy has on you. it is clearly obvious to all of us here what is going on.
he clearly has something on you and it must be significant.
pictures of you playing golf with the devil?
i don't know, and personally don't care.
your website is excellent.
and the sooner you jettison chimpy the better off you will be personally, and this website will be the better for it.