Thursday, December 20, 2012

Fear And Loathing - Harry Reid Beclowns Boehner Again on 'Plan B'

 

The 'fiscal cliff' saga becomes even more of a joke, if it's possible.

Republican Speaker John Boehner got sand kicked in his face Tuesday when he decided to advance what he thought was a reasonable proposal, took any talk of a debt ceiling limit off the table and essentially endorsed the exact proposal Democrat House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi put out back in May of this year, for tax hikes on gross incomes over $1 million.


The Democrats laughed at him, saying that the May proposal was just a political ploy anyway.


Boehner's next brilliant idea was to have the House vote on his new proposal, dubbed 'Plan B' anyway, where, in his mind, the Senate would be forced to vote on it, or take the heat for allowing tax increases across the board.


After Dem Senate  Majority Leader Harry Reid stopped cackling hysterically, he called a presser and simply told the reporters that, guess what, he wasn't even going to allow the senate to vote on Boehner's little brainstorm, or pretty much anything else Boehner came up with:

Senate majority leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, made his "fiscal cliff" position clear in a press conference today. "We are not going to do anything," said Reid.

Reid added, "We are not taking up anything they are working on over there."

The top Democrat in the Senate was explaining his inaction on the House plan, the proposal put forward by Republican John Boehner, the speaker of the House of Representatives. Boehner's plan is being referred to as 'Plan B.' [...]

In the past, Reid has indicated he'd be open to compromising. "We are willing to compromise," he said earlier this month, "but we also will not consign the middle class to higher tax bills while millionaires and billionaires avoid all the pain."

Now that Republicans have a serious proposal that would pass the House and would seem to meet the requirements Democrats previously insisted on, Reid won't permit a vote.


Why should he?

To Obama and Reid, this is a win-win. They want taxes to go up and the drastic cuts to happen, because they mainly come from the defense budget. Last year, I predicted this when GOP Minority leader Mitch McConnell made the stupid deal to increase Obama's credit card limit ( AKA the debt ceiling) in the first place. They now have no incentive to do anything.

If we go over the cliff, not only does President Obama get the higher tax rates and drastic cuts to the military he wants,but President Obama can even propose a bill at a later date to lower taxes on what he dubs the Middle Class while blaming the tax hikes on the Republicans. President Obama will then take credit for lowering the taxes thathis resistance to compromise caused in the first place.

In a way, Boehner and McConnell's putting themselves in this box is symbolic of what the GOP establishment gets wrong consistently.

"Oh, Romney can't criticize Obama, he'll lose independents" - So Romney carried Independents, the base stayed home and he LOST. The GOP still hasn't learned as witnessed by their purging of conservatives form committee seats. Trying to be Democrat Lite isn't going to win elections, and caving to Obama's blackmail isn't going to either.

The Republicans need to have a conservative spokesperson (NOT Boehner) tell the country that the path Obama has put us on is unsustainable, and explain why. And then tell the country that the Republicans are going to let Obama have whatever he wants, that every GOP legislator will vote 'present' in protest, but that it's now HIS economy, and he won't be able to blame the resulting mess on anyone else.

Conservatism wins when it's expressed clearly and eloquently.The men running the Republican party these days seems to have forgotten that, if they ever learned it in the first place



Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Merry Christmas, Taxpayers! Obama To Dump GM Stock At $12 B Loss



Ho ho ho, has Obama Claus got something for you!

Back when President Obama was pounding his chest about his wonderful success with the GM bailout, I never could figure out why a sharp businessman like Mitt Romney chose not to reveal the truth to the voters.

The GM bailout was only designed to do one thing - pay back the president's union supporters and campaign contributors at taxpayer expense, Chicago-style. It amounted to wiping out GM's private equity holders,many of them elderly retirees and gifting the company to the unions.

The cost? Oh before today's announcement, something like $88 billion in taxpayer funds.

The GM stock the feds were holding was put up for sale in the initial public offering which was supposed to recoup our initial $50 billion 'investment' was supposed to start out at $36 per share, around where the stock traded shortly after the offering hit the market. Instead, it tanked and the losses alone on the devalued stock the feds got stuck with came to over $16.6 billion...not counting the $26.4 billion in direct aid that's never been recouped.

There's also that $45.4 billion dollar tax credit against future profits at the American taxpayer's expense given to them by the Obama Administration that could keep GM tax free for years.GM earned a $7.6 billion 'profit' in 2011 but paid no taxes.

Now, we can up the cost even higher. President Obama's lump of coal in your stocking is today's announcement that the feds will be dumping their remaining GM stock.

About half of the stock is going to be sold back to GM's union owners for $5.5 billion. And that's not all, the union is getting a price of $27.50 per share, about 8 percent higher than GM’s closing price yesterday,when the deal was signed. The Feds are going to try to sell the rest of it at any price they can get over the next 15 months or so. The cost to the taxpayers? An estimated $12 billion.

That brings the cost of the GM bailout to a nice $100 billion or so, give or take.The linked Examiner article doesn't count the tax break and thus severely understates what the GM bailout actually cost.

During the campaign , President Obama lied to the American people telling us that the Obama Administration 'got back every dime we invested'.

That $100 billion or so is money the taxpayers will never see again. Unless you happen to be a Democrat running for office with union campaign contributions in your war chest.

Merry Christmas.



The Office Christmas Party That Self-destructed...

Someone slipped this under my door..it appears to be to be a series of memos from the Human Resources Director of a medium sized company:



FROM: Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO: All Employees
DATE: November 1, 2012
RE: Gala Christmas Party

I'm happy to inform you that the company Christmas Party will take place on December 23rd, starting at noon in the private function room at the Grill House. There will be a cash bar and plenty of drinks! We'll have a small band playing traditional carols... feel free to sing along.

And don't be surprised if our CEO shows up dressed as Santa Claus!

A Christmas tree will be lit at 1:00 PM. Exchanges of gifts among employees can be done at that time; however, no gift should be over $10.00 to make the giving of gifts easy for everyone's pockets. This gathering is only for employees!

Our CEO will make a special announcement at that time!

Merry Christmas to you and your family,
Patty

------------------------------------------------------------------------


FROM: Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO: All Employees
DATE: November 2, 2012
RE: Gala Holiday Party


In no way was yesterday's memo intended to exclude our Jewish employees. We recognize that Hanukkah is an important holiday, which often coincides with Christmas, though unfortunately not this year. However, from now on, we're calling it our " Holiday Party."

The same policy applies to any other employees who are not Christians and to those still celebrating Reconciliation Day. There will be no Christmas tree and no Christmas carols will be sung. We will have other types of music for your enjoyment.

Happy now?


Happy Holidays to you and your family,
Patty

--------------------------------------------------------

FROM: Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO: All Employees
DATE: November 5, 2012
RE: Holiday Party

Regarding the note I received from a member of Alcoholics Anonymous requesting a non-drinking table, you didn't sign your name. I'm happy to accommodate this request, but if I put a sign on a table that reads, "AA Only", you wouldn't be anonymous anymore.

How am I supposed to handle this? Somebody?

And sorry, but forget about the gift exchange, no gifts are allowed since the union members feel that $10.00 is too much money and the executives believe $10.00 is a little chintzy.
REMEMBER: NO GIFTS EXCHANGE WILL BE ALLOWED.

PATTY

--------------------------------------------------------

FROM: Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
To: All Employees
DATE: November 7, 2012
RE: Generic Holiday Party

What a diverse group we are! I had no idea that December 20th begins the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which forbids eating and drinking during daylight hours. There goes the party!

Seriously, we can appreciate how a luncheon at this time of year does not accommodate our Muslim employees' beliefs. Perhaps the Grill House can hold off on serving your meal until the end of the party or else package everything for you to take it home in little foil doggy bags. Will that work?

Meanwhile, I've arranged for members of Weight Watchers to sit farthest from the dessert buffet, and pregnant women will get the table closest to the restrooms.

Gays are allowed to sit with each other.Lesbians do not have to sit with Gay men, each group will have their own table.Yes, there will be flower arrangement for the Gay men's table.

To the person asking permission to cross dress, the Grill House asks that no cross-dressing be allowed, apparently because of concerns about confusion in the restrooms.


Sorry.

We will have booster seats for short people. Low-fat food will be available for those on a diet.

I am sorry to report that we cannot control the amount of salt used in the food . The Grill House suggests that people with high blood pressure taste a bite first.

There will be fresh "low sugar" fruits as dessert for diabetics, but the restaurant cannot supply "no sugar" desserts. Sorry!

Did I miss anything?!?!?

Patty

--------------------------------------------------------

FROM: Patty Lewis, Human Resources Director
TO: All #*%^ing Employees
DATE: November 12, 2012
RE: The #*%^ing Holiday Party

I've had it with you vegetarian pricks!!!

We're going to keep this party at the Grill House whether you like it or not, so you can sit quietly at the table furthest from the "grill of death," as you so quaintly put it, and you'll get your f*%^ing salad bar, including organic tomatoes.

But you know, tomatoes have feelings, too. They scream when you slice them. I've heard them scream. I'm hearing them scream right NOW!

The rest of you f*%^ing wierdos can kiss my *ss. I hope you all have a rotten holiday! Drive drunk and die.

The B*tch from H*ll!!!
PATTY

--------------------------------------------------------

FROM: Joan Bishop, Acting Human Resources Director
DATE: November 14, 2012
RE: Patty Lewis and Holiday Party

I'm sure I speak for all of us in wishing Patty Lewis a speedy recovery and I'll continue to forward your cards to her.

In the meantime, management has decided to cancel our Holiday Party and give everyone the afternoon of the 23rd off with full pay.

Happy Holidays!
Joan

-------------------------------------------







Uh, Merry Christmas everyone!



Robert Bork, 1927-2012



Judge Robert Bork, one of America's most prominent jurists and legal thinkers passed away today, at age 85.

After receiving a Phi Beta Kappa with his law degree at the University of Chicago, serving in the Marine Corps and spending some time in private practice, he went on to become a revered professor at Yale Law School and a highly regarded legal thinker whose writings virtually reformed the practice of antitrust jurisprudence and pioneered a lot of the modern movement back towards originalism in constitutional law. It's no exaggeration to say that almost every prominent jurist in America was affected by his ideas, not to mention a number of his other students like Bill Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Anita Hill, Robert Reich, Jerry Brown, John R. Bolton, Samuel Issacharoff, and Cynthia Estlund.

Bork's attitude towards the Constitution and the Founders can be summed up in one famous quote: "The truth is that the judge who looks outside the Constitution always looks inside himself and nowhere else."

Bork served as solicitor general in the Nixon and Ford Administration, and then served as a judge on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals before being nominated by President Reagan to as a justice for the Supreme Court.

What happened next gave a whole new word to the language, 'borked', referring to gratuitous slander and defamation used as a toll in political warfare.

The Democrats on the Left had regained a senate majority in the 1986 midterms, had already warned President Reagan that they wanted someone with their ideology nominated to replace retiring Justice Lewis Powell, and that they would fight tooth and nail against anyone he nominated who didn't pass muster with them. When President Reagan nominated the eminently qualified Bork in 1987, they declared open war.

Led by Senator Ted Kennedy, they attacked his morals, his character, played the race card and stopped at nothing, Here's a sample of Kennedy in action:

Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the Government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is— and is often the only— protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy..

Imagine, being lectured on morality by Ted Kennedy.

Bork's response was to state simply "There was not a line in that speech that was accurate."

He was right, but with media like the New York Times and the alphabet networks leading the way, the message that Bork was a radical extremist, a racist and a fascist took hold and became the narrative.

Nothing like that had ever taken place during the confirmation of a Supreme Court justice, and Kennedy's tactics opened up a whole new era of bitter partisan warfare, another of his legacies to the American people that still besmirches our country and its politics long after his death.

The Reagan Administration was not prepared for this, and neither was Judge Bork. When he responded with feeling to the attacks by Kennedy and others on his morals and character, Kennedy was able to corral enough votes to defeat his nomination, 58–42.

Roger Kimball
is quite correct in calling it 'obscene'. It was.

Bork went on to continue his career as one of America's most prominent legal thinkers. He became a a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson institute, did some legal consulting with private clients and taught at the University of Richmond School of Law and at the Ave Maria School of Law in Naples, Florida.

He also write two best selling books, "The Tempting of America" and "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline."

To read them is to engage with a mind of prodigious intellectual fire power, and their prescience in analyzing the role of the Left in the decline of American freedom and civil society is eye opening.

Judge Bork passed away  after living a life of accomplishment and leaving behing a legacy of work and thought that will long out last his time on earth.

RIP.

Will Voices On The Left Stand By Their Previous Support For The 2nd Amendment?



In view of President Obama's call to weaken the second amendment, it's worth looking at what two voices on the Left had to say about the right of Americans to own personal firearms.

One of them is ex-Solicitor General and now Supreme Court Justice Elana Kagan, answering questions during her confirmation hearings. The questioner is none other than Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat from Vermont who is probably only surpassed in the senate on the left end of the spectrum by Socialist Bernie Sanders and senate-elect Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts.

The Supreme Court decision they're discussing is District of Columbia v. Heller, which settled that the Second Amendment guarantees to Americans an individual right to keep and bear arms.

This is worth looking at because a number of the usual suspects are again raising the question about that individual right.

If they're called on to vote on the matter, will Justice Kagan and Senator Leahy stick to their guns (pun intended) or will they find it convenient to go with the flow, now that President Obama and some of his surrogates have weighed in?

Leahy's home state of Vermont, by the way, has the loosest gun laws of any state in the union, including allowing concealed carry. It also has the lowest firearms homicide rate in America, 4 per 100,00 people.

A Game Change In Syria



The situation in the Syrian insurgency has changed in an interesting way.

We started out with the Obama administration actually supporting Bashir Assad - remember Secretary of State Hillary Clinton referring to Assad as a 'reformer' and Senator John Kerry shilling for U.S. aid to him?

The next twist in the road was the Obama administration supporting the insurgents, consisting of the Syrian National Council(SNC) and the Syrian Free Army, a group put together at the insistence of President Obama's closest friend among foreign leaders, Tayyip Erdogan and the Islamist Turkish government. The U.S. government has been supplying them with arms and some training via Turkey and Jordan while Qatar and the Saudis have been supplying most of the funding.

Of course, the problem is that the SNC and the Syrian Free Army are controlled in their entirety by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Salafists, some of them outright al-Qaeda affiliates like Jabhat al-Nusra. Apparently this troubling fact just came to light in Washington.

So the next step was to put together yet another insurgent group of Syrian 'moderates' to back, the Syrian Opposition Coalition,(SOC)and the associated Joint Military Council because, in President Obama's words, it was "now inclusive enough, is reflective and representative enough of the Syrian population, that we consider them the legitimate representative of the Syrian people in opposition to the Assad regime."

Except that there are just a few problems. Mere details.

This new coalition, formed in Qatar is only two thirds composed of members of the Muslim Brotherhood or their affiliates.

The leader of the SOC is one Ahmed Mouaz al-Khatib, former imam of the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, and - wait for it - a religious cleric closely allied to the Damascus branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Another troubling detail is that the SOC and their affiliated Joint Military Council are mostly located outside Syria, and it has few boots on the ground if any, let alone weapons. Thanks to the Obama Administration,it is the Syrian National Council and the Syrian Free Army who have the fighters and the weaponry, some of it reportedly taken from deposed Libyan leader Moamar Khaddaffi's armories, although that part of the sordid Libyan story has yet to be proven conclusively. If that's what actually went down, I suppose we could call it Fast and Furious, Middle East style.

As you might guess, the SNC and the Syrian Free Army aren't taking kindly to a bunch of ferenghi in DC and the EU dumping them and telling them whom represents the resistance and whom doesn't, especially when it's been them doing the fighting and dying against Assad's forces.

The ace in the hole for the newly formed and recognized Syrian Opposition Coalition is that they're going to be the main recipient and control point of Western economic aid. That ought to buy them a seat at the table.

But let's not make the mistake that this is going to end up with a moderate, pro-western government.

The SOC is just as anti-western, just as anti-Israel and almost as Islamist as the SNC.They will almost certainly come together and deal to put together a sharia go0verned Islamist state.

It's the Muslim Brotherhood who has the clear agenda, a disciplined corps of followers subject to an organized hierarchy and the ruthlessness to take over in Syria. The Brotherhood has Qatar and Turkey backing it, and they are ultimately the best bet to be Syria's next government.

What's left of Syria's Christians are already fleeing, mostly to Lebanon, the only Arab country that still has a sizable Christian population.

If the Russians cut Assad loose (and there are some signs that they may now be leaning that way), Assad would be unable to put together a northwestern redoubt as I discussed here. The Shi'ites and Alawites, those that stay, can look forward, at best, to being marginalized if not ethnically cleansed.

The Kurds, meanwhile, are keeping to themselves and consolidating their strength in the northeast, the area adjacent to Iraqi Kurdistan. The odds are good that they may merge in a de facto union with their fellow Kurds just over the border as a precursor to a free Kurdistan.It is the one positive development out of this entire mess.

Syria, like Iraq is an artificial country, some lines in the sand created out of the debris of the Ottoman Empire after WWI. And like Iraq, it was a seething mass of ethnicities ruled over by an iron fisted dictator, until we kicked it over.

Given the coming showdown between the Sunnis and the Muslim Brotherhood versus the Shi'ite Iranian bloc, it's fascinating that in Iraq we midwifed a transition from a Sunni-ruled dictatorship to a Shi'ite one that is essentially becoming an Iranian colony, while in Syria, we're engaged in doing the exact opposite, transforming an Alawite Shi'ite dictatorship into a Sunni one.

The Obama Administration goal, to all intents and purposes is to establish yet another Muslim Brotherhood regime in the Middle East.Or to put it more bluntly, The U.S. is now backing what is essentially an anti-western, Islamist takeover of Syria

And not just in Syria, of course. President Obama and his team believe that the solution to our conflicts with the Muslim world is 'daylight' between the U.S. and its ally Israel ( the president's own words) while we encourage Islamist regimes to take over, as they have in Egypt and Gaza, and may soon take over in Libya, Syria, the Palestinian occupied areas of Judea and Samaria and Jordan.

This is the start of the Caliphate Hassan al-Banna dreamt of, when he started the Muslim Brotherhood back in the 1920's.

In later years, we're going to find out exactly what a huge act of folly this was.


Watcher's Council Nominations - Getting Ready For Christmas Edition

 



Welcome to the Watcher's Council, a blogging group consisting of some of the most incisive blogs in the 'sphere, and the longest running group of its kind in existence. Every week, the members nominate two posts each, one written by themselves and one written by someone from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council.Then we vote on the best two posts, with the results appearing on Friday.

This week a lot of minds are on what happened at a school in Newtown. It also makes me think about heroism. Accordingly,this week's contest is dedicated to the memories of Vickie Soto and Senator Daniel Inouye, medal of Honor winner.

Council News:

This week, Ask Marion, Right Truth, The Pirate's Cove and Liberty's Spirit took advantage of my generous offer of link whorage and earned honorable mention status with some excellent articles they sent in for consideration.

You can, too! Want to see your work appear on the Watcher’s Council homepage in our weekly contest listing? Didn’t get nominated by a Council member? No worries.

Simply head over to Joshuapundit and post the title a link to the piece you want considered along with an e-mail address ( which won't be published) in the comments section no later than Monday 6PM PST in order to be considered for our honorable mention category. Then simply return the favor by creating a post on your site linking to the Watcher’s Council contest for the week when it comes out Wednesday Morning.

It's a great way of exposing your best work to Watcher’s Council readers and Council members. while grabbing the increased traffic and notoriety. And how good is that, eh?

Ok, so let's see what delightful delectables, scrumptious snark and intellectual stimulation we have this week....


Council Submissions


Honorable Mentions


Non-Council Submissions


Enjoy! And don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us Twitter..'cause we're cool like that!

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Pat Condell On The UN And Israel



Pat Condell does a bit of plain speaking on the UN, Israel, and what the UN has become..in his words, a cartel of bronze age barbarians, being run by brutal, barbaric Islamic hellholes.

Fast And Furious Gun Linked In Murder Of Mexican Beauty Queen



Maria Susana Flores Gamez, Miss Sinaloa was murdered in an incident this weekend in a shootout between members of the Sinaloa drug cartel and Mexican soldiers. She was apparently used as a human shield by the cartel shooters.

She was just 20 years old.

Found near her body was a Romanian AK-47-type WASR-10 rifle purchased by Uriel Patino at an Arizona gun shop in 2010, as part of the Fast and Furious operation. Patino allegedly purchased 700 guns while under the ATF’s 'sponsorship'.

Sn. Gamez isn't alone. So far, over three hundred murders have been linked to firearms walked over the border because of 'Fast and Furious', an operation of the Obama Justice Department that saw straw buyers purchasing over 2,000 weapons from Arizona gunships under ATF supervision, with the owners of the shops ordered to cooperate and ask no questions by the ATF.They didn't even bother to inform the Mexican government or coordinate anything with them.

You see, the Obama Administration isn't really against guns - just in America. They were apparently fine with shipping guns to Mexican drug cartels.

Sharryl Atkinson, the reporter on the linked CBS story is one of the few reporters in the mainstream press who has been actually covering this scandal. In a Republican administration, 'Fast and Furious' would have been screaming headline news, with the media calling en masse for the president's impeachment or resignation.

Someday though, I'm convinced that the ghosts of SN. Gamez and the other Mexicans who were murdered because of 'Fast and Furious' will receive justice.

One way or the other.

Fast and Furious is one of the few times I've actually felt like I had to apologize for my country.

The Fiscal Cliff Farce - Time To Fire John Boehner, Seriously

 

I say this with regret, because I actually think that GOP House Speaker John Boehner is, in his own way, a dedicated public servant.

But it's apparent that he has no idea whom he's dealing with in negotiations with this president and the Democrats, and even less courage. It's like watching someone take a stroll in New York's Central Park at 2 AM and seeing him react with surprise and shock when he gets mugged and beaten to a bloody pulp.

In the latest from the saga of the fiscal cliff, Boehner advanced what he thought was at least a reasonable starting point - he took any talk of a debt ceiling limit off the table and essentially endorsed the exact proposal Democrat House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi put out back in May of this year, for tax hikes on gross incomes over $1 million.

No sooner did he do that when the Democrats (laughing hysterically among themselves I'm sure) responded that it simply wasn't good enough, and that it was all just a 'political ploy' anyway by Pelosi.

The White House quickly agreed, saying it doesn't go far enough and wouldn't pass the Democrat majority Senate anyway.

The truth is that President Obama and the Democrats don't need or want a deal. The President has no problem with raising taxes on everyone or with the drastic sequestration cuts that will come mostly at the expense of the military.

Last year, when Minority Leader Senator Mitch McConnell made a last minute deal with President Obama to raise his credit card limit (AKA, the debt ceiling) and Boehner quickly endorsed it and rammed it through the House, I predicted this would happen.

The way this was set up it's a win-win for the president.

If a desperate Boehner completely caves, President Obama need only agree if he gets everything he wants with no concessions.At best, there will be some smoke and mirrors nonsense that means nothing to make the surrender compatible, like there was last year.

If there is no deal, the president gets the tax hikes and cuts in the defense budget he wants anyway, and will just sing the same old song about 'obstructionist Republicans, trying to protect the wealthy' while his media lackeys sing backup.That's what he's holding over Boehner's head and why Boehner is behaving so cravenly trying to stave off the inevitable.

The only way to deal with this kind of blackmail is for the Republicans to go public. It should have happened last year. They need to find someone ( NOT Boehner)to speak to the nation, inform them simply and directly of exactly why the president's policies are leading the country to fiscal ruin. And explain that since President Obama is unwilling to negotiate in good faith, the Republicans are going to let him do what he wants, but that every Republican legislator will vote 'present' in protest.

It would then become Obama's economy and Obama's policies, with no Republican fingerprints on it. When the house of cards collapses, President Obama will no longer have someone else to blame.

At this point, I think Rep. Boehner has to look back on his tenure as Speaker and simply admit that he failed, utterly. The decent thing for him to do would be to resign as Speaker, but with a little over a month left in his term the least he should do is announce that he will not be a candidate for Speaker in the next Congress, to give someone more able a chance to begin campaigning for the job.


Tiempo passado, y también los hombres.


Monday, December 17, 2012

'Oooh, The Taxes We'll Raise' - Democrats In California Salivate Over Their 2/3 Majority

Democrats have controlled California's legislature for some time, but the election last November saw Democrats in California's legislature get something they've been lusting after for decades - a two thirds, veto-proof supermajority in both the Assembly and the State Senate.

The Republicans, who have been able to block at least some of the more outlandish proposals might as well not even show up in Sacramento anymore.

The linked article farcically talks about California 'emerging from a prolonged recession'. The writer, Adam Nagourney obviously considers a U-1 10.1 unemployment rate (more like 14.7 in real U-6 unemployment terms), a $16 billion deficit, a large exodus of the state's companies, entrepreneurs and skilled professionals fleeing the high taxes in the country and massive over regulation to be signs of an emerging recovery.

And it's about to get far worse.

Aside from the new, higher sales and income taxes the voters approved after a massive campaign mostly funded by California's public employee unions, the next target is California's Proposition 13, a law passed back in the 1970's that requires a 2/3 majority to raise property taxes beyond a certain level:

Many Democrats said a top priority was figuring out a way to remove deep spending cuts made to education and other state services, which could mean finding new revenue.

“We do need to take stock,” said Ellen M. Corbett, the Senate Democratic leader. “We do need to take a look at things we have cut that may impact our ability to grow the economy.”

Senator Mark Leno, a Democrat, proposed putting on the ballot an initiative that would allow school districts and cities to pass a parcel tax increase with 55 percent of voters, down from the two-thirds requirement in Proposition 13. Lawmakers said they were also reviewing business tax exemptions they agreed to in order to win Republican votes.

Another Democrat, Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner, said, “What we want is to look carefully to see what kind of tax do we have like that, that are costing our schools, costing our taxpayers and not benefiting our economy.” {...}

Now that the Democrats have a supermajority, there has been a growing call for lawmakers to put an initiative before voters to revise Proposition 13, either by eliminating the two-thirds requirement or creating a split tax roll, which would protect residential property owners but remove protection from commercial and industrial properties.


Given the state's current demographics, getting 55% of the voters to approve massive taxation on those who own property would not be a very difficult bar to get over.

Proposition 13 came about because the Democrat-dominated legislature arbitrarily raised property taxes through the roof back in the 1970's, devastating the housing market as people decided not to buy and kicking existing homeowners, especially retirees, out of their homes because they could no longer afford the taxes. Most people are smart enough to realize that once the firewall of proposition 13 is breached, it's only going to be a matter of time until we return to those days, especially with a Democrat supermajority.

California's already devastated real estate market would collapse as people rush to sell their homes while they still might be able to find a buyer...not an easy thing as it is today with the Obama economy. Corporations will simply sell their commercial property and move out adding to the already prevalent 'for rent' signs.

The Golden State, happily killing the goose that lays the golden egg.

Iran Loves The Idea Of Chuck Hagel As SecDef

You'd think the president would get a clue from the Iranian response to his pick of pro-Iranm, anti-Israel Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense to replace Leon Panetta. Uh, no.

Here's Iran's state-owned PRESS-TV on the matter in a piece titled, "Obama expected to nominate anti-Israel Hagel as secretary of defense" :

US President Barack Obama is expected to nominate former Senator Chuck Hagel, an outspoken critic of Israel, as the next Pentagon chief.”

Hagel has not yet been officially nominated for the defense secretary position, but all indicators suggest he’s at the top of President Obama’s list. {...}


Some in the Israeli lobby have reportedly reacted with alarm to reports of Hagel’s nomination as he is known as an outspoken critic of the Zionist lobby in Washington.

Josh Block, a former AIPAC spokesman has lashed out at Hagel for “consistently voting against sanctions on Iran” over the country’s nuclear energy program and refusing to call on the European Union to name Lebanon’s Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.

The top nominee for the post of Defense Secretary was the first Republican senator to publicly criticize the war in Iraq, calling it the worst foreign policy blunder since the Vietnam War, and he has consistently opposed any plan to launch military strike against Iran.


Yeah, he's Iran's man alright. As a matter of fact, he's on the board of directors of Deustche Bank, who are being investigated by American Authorities for violating sanctions against Iran...the same ones he's always been a vociferous opponent of.

Stay tuned....


Sunday, December 16, 2012

Obama Uses Sandy Scam To Request $13B In Additional Funding For 'Storms To Be Named Later'

 

President Obama is using the Sandy disaster as a wedge to get Congress to OK $13 billion in additional funding...not for Sandy relief, but literally, 'for storms to be named later'.

The breakdown is interesting. The biggest items aren't for things like flood prevention ( a paltry $150 million) or even Corps of Engineers  Investigations ($ 30 million) to see how to prevent future disasters like Sandy.

Here are the big ticket items. Let's look at them one by one. And remember,money is fungible. Once it's appropriated, it can be used anywhere. :


  • Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development, Community Development Fund, $ 2 billion.



  • HUD is an especially bottomless pit. While I'm certain the Obama Administration can come up with a glib explanation, 'community development' isn't about disaster relief. The money, however, can be used for anything from voter registration and 'community organizing' by the new heirs to ACORN, loan grants to people whom otherwise wouldn't qualify, HUD salaries, facilities and hiring, anything you could imagine.


  • Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration, Public Transportation Emergency Relief Program $ 5.5 billion

  • Hey, let's use some of the taxpayer's money to bail out Amtrack, the California Bullet train and other scams backed by well-connected Democrat donors!Great idea. Tell Geithner to fire up his computer and digitize another Five and a half bil!


  • Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Operations, Research, and Facilities, $ 360 million.

    How much of this is for actual testing and research on storms like Sandy and how much of it is for outside projects that have nothing to do with disaster relief?



  • Corps of Engineers Construction $ 3,820 billion


  • Legitimate on its face, except when you remember that this money is for 'storms to be named later'. How much of this is for improvements in things like levees and runoffs that are needed NOW and how much of it is just another slush fund, to be diverted elsewhere?


  • Environmental Protection Agency State and Tribal Assistance Grants $610 million.


  • The only thing I can see this money legitimately being used for - maybe-is improvement in sewage facilities and storm drainage, and the latter ought to come under the previous category anyway . Again, remember that this is for disasters that haven't happened yet.

    Even putting the best face on it, at least $8.5 billion of the requested $13 billion looks like sheer slush fund heaven, and I wouldn't be a bit surprised to find that a good part of the rest of it is too.We are, after all, dealing with a fiscally irresponsible president and administration of historical proportions.

    The worst part is whom actually suffers, the victims of Sandy.

    Governor Christie and the president got a nice photo-op out of it, one that may even have been something of a game changer right before the election. But the truth is that relief assistance is trickling in a lot more slowly than it should, many of the victims of Sandy are still homeless and in want and now that it's out of the headlines, the media caravan has moved on and isn't covering the story.

    By loading the Sandy relief bill with this kind of lard, the assistance to the victims of Sandy is only going to be delayed further. And an additional political benefit for this president, one I'm sure he's counting on, is the ability to slam Republicans for 'obstructionism and playing politics while people are suffering' if they dare to demand an honest accounting of where this $13 billion in non-Sandy spending is actually going.

    Despicable, yes, but that's how President Obama and his friends play the game.

    Never waste a good crisis, right Mr. President?


    The Best Comment On The Sandy Hook Tragedy



    The above is a picture taken at an ordinary elementary school in Israel.( h/t Powerline)

    If a maniac or Arab terrorist attacks these kids, they aren't defenseless.

    Imagine how many lives this heroine,first grade teacher Vicki Soto
    could have saved if she'd been armed and trained, including, perhaps, her own.

    As it was, she did the only thing she could to save her children..she put her body between them and the killer and took a bullet for them.

    Forum:What Celebrity Or Public Figure Would You Most Like To Meet And Spend Time With?



    Every week on Monday morning , the Council and invited guests weigh in at the Watcher's Forum, short takes on a major issue or query of the day. This week's question: What Celebrity Or Public Figure Would You Most Like To Meet And Spend Time With?

     The Colossus of Rhodey:I'd like to spend a day with Dennis Miller. I've always loved his sarcastic humor, his impressive vocabulary (and the two used together), and now his political acumen. The latter is important because he's a "reformed" liberal, much like actor Ron Silver. I enjoyed his since-canceled CNBC show from years back, and always look forward to his appearances on The O'Reilly Factor every Wednesday.

     The Razor: I am an extremely private, shy and solitary person, so the idea of meeting a stranger and spending time with them does not come naturally to me making it a very difficult question. It is complicated by the fact that most of my heroes are dead, and those that are living have clay feet (Nelson Mandela criticized the US reaction to 9-11 and sided with Saddam Hussein against the US as he slipped into the twilight of senescence.)

    Instead I’ll propose a meeting in a warm coffee shop on a cold afternoon with Charles Krauthammer, PJ O’Rourke, and Walter Russell Mead. Since “four” is an odd number for conversation, I would sit back and listen to the three discuss the world. I personally wouldn’t offer much; I wouldn’t have to. All three men have different personalities and perspectives on events and have shaped my thinking over the years, so I would be adding anything original to the conversation.

    But I would ask them one question before we broke up and went our separate ways that night: What do we need to do to save our country from ruin by the plutocracy that runs it? I honestly don’t know. I veer from constructive determination powered by righteous anger to despair often within seconds. I suppose Krauthammer, being a psychiatrist, could recommend someone or something for that, but I’d be curious to hear the three men – each a genius in his own right – debate what is to be done during Obama’s second term to prevent the progressives from mortally wounding our country.

     The Noisy Room: My choice would be Glenn Beck. It's a hard question for me because I don't consider celebrities anything special due to the nature of my work. I have worked with quite a few and I have a different viewpoint on people. Money and fame have little effect on me. I would choose Beck, because I genuinely like the guy and he could easily have been part of my family.

    I would like to meet with him not only for business insights, but for religious ones as well. I believe he would be fascinating to talk with and a great deal could be learned from his viewpoints on religion and politics. Plus, he's just plain funny and that is what I like in people. I know that there would be endless topics we could discuss and it would be time well spent. There are few people that you can just sit and talk with and lose track of time... I'm certain Glenn Beck is one of those people. It's been a long time since I could sit down and debate/speak with someone one on one just for the sake of going over topics. My father and I use to do that for hours at a time and I miss it dearly.

    Yep, Beck would be fun to shoot the breeze with. But with The Blaze, his radio show, cable presence and books galore, it's as if I have already gotten to know him and spend time with him. We think a great deal alike (too bad for Beck). So in a way, I've already spent time with him and it has been worth every minute. He's been a blessing to many, many people.


     JoshuaPundit: I'm going to cheat, just a bit. Because it would largely depend what I was in the mood for.

    So, my choice...if I was feeling like sheer amusement, Sasha Barat-Cohen  without a doubt. Hanging with him for a day would be like being a participant in my own private circus.

    If I wanted the best in deep thinking, American politics and advice on breaking into media, Rush Limbaugh. I first started listening to him in the Clinton 'vast right wing conspiracy' years and tuned in just to see what all the fuss was about. He literally changed a lot of my fuzzy thinking around almost before I realized it. From all accounts, an incredibly nice man away from the mike as well.

    If I wanted to discuss geopolitics and foreign policy, I'd opt for none other than the brilliant Dr. Henry Kissinger.Anyone who doubts his intellectual firepower has only to read one of his books. Even in his nineties his mind is like a steel trap. Probably our most accomplished Secretary of State, in my opinion.


    The Political Commentator: No question John Bolton. Been trying too.


    David Gerstman, AKA Soccer Dad:The public figure I'd most like to meet is Natan Sharansky.

    Not only did he survive years of imprisonment in Soviet jails, he was eventually freed and become a politician and public figure in Israel.

    Though many of his old champions shun him because he became too "right wing," he still promotes a "freedom agenda."

    His freedom agenda is not the same as George W. Bush's. President Bush unfortunately advocated elections without infrastructure. Sharansky sees elections as the final step in the creation of democratic government.

    How does he feel about the "Arab spring?" How does it compare with the fall of communism?


    Rhymes With Right: This is one of those questions I find difficult to answer, since as I understand the question we are limited to living people.

    Certainly, I can think of a number of political figures I would love to meet and spend time with -- including to be honest, some I do not agree with politically.

    I could easily name a number of football players, actors, and musicians.

    But when it comes right down to it, my choice would have to be an author -- Tom Clancy. I've loved his Jack Ryan novels ever since reading the first one. I've been fascinated by his non-fiction works about defense issues. I would love to get inside his head and learn about the writer's craft. I'd also love to know what he really thought of the casting decisions on the movie adaptations of his books -- and the liberties taken in adapting them to the big screen.

    Now maybe that makes me boring -- but I am who I am.

     The Independent Sentinel: I would like to meet Mitt Romney and thank him for giving it his all. He tried to save the Republic and I am grateful to him for that . He would have been a good President.


     Well, there you have it.

    Make sure to tune in every Monday for the Watcher’s Forum. And remember, every Wednesday, the Council has its weekly contest with the members nominating two posts each, one written by themselves and one written by someone from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council. The votes are cast by the Council, and the results are posted on Friday morning.

    It’s a weekly magazine of some of the best stuff written in the blogosphere, and you won’t want to miss it. And don’t forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter..’cause we’re cool like that, y'know?


    Friday, December 14, 2012

    Obama's Next SecDef Appointee - Pro-Iran, Anti-Israel Chuck Hagel?

    The man with the inside track to become President Obama's new Secretary of Defense now that Leon Panetta is moving on is no less than Chuck Hagel, former Republican senator from Nebraska.

    Hagel is fairly close to President Obama, having been a supporter in 2008 and an appointee to the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board.

    He's an interesting choice, one of those creatures that believes that the so-called Jewish Lobby runs DC. He was quoted as saying so in Aaron David Miller's 2008 book "The Too Much Promised Land".

    He's consistently voted against pro-Israel resolutions and legislation:

    In August 2006, Hagel was one of only 12 Senators who refused to write the EU asking them to declare Hezbollah a terrorist organization.

    In October 2000, Hagel was one of only 4 Senators who refused to sign a Senate letter in support of Israel.

    In November 2001, Hagel was one of only 11 Senators who refused to sign a letter urging President Bush not to meet with the late Yassir Arafat until his forces ended the violence against Israel.

    In December 2005, Hagel was one of only 27 who refused to sign a letter to President Bush to pressure the Palestinian Authority to ban terrorist groups from participating in Palestinian legislative elections.

    In June 2004, Hagel refused to sign a letter urging President Bush to highlight Iran's nuclear program at the G-8 summit.

    Just a coincidence, But Senator Hagel is apparently quite enamored of Iran. In edition to what I mentioned above, he's long been an advocate of taking Iranian proxies Hamas and Hezbollah off the State Department's list of terrorist groups,

    In fact, while he was in the Senate, notonly did he refuse to call on the EU to name Hezbollah a terrorist group, Hagel voted against designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization. He also consistently voted against sanctions on Iran for their illicit pursuit of nuclear weapons.

    One might almost suspect one of those cladestine lobbying contracts so well known in DC Land.

    In fact..just another coincidence of course...The Washington Free Beacon reported on Thursday that Hagel is also on the board of directors of Deutsche Bank, which is now  being investigated by U.S. authorities for violations of the same Iran sanctions Hagel voted against when he was in Congress.

    According to the Weekly Standard, a top senatorial aide  emailed them, saying, "Send us Hagel and we will make sure every American knows he is an anti-Semite."

    Maybe. I don't know what's inside of him. But let's just say that based on his history, it looks like he at least  likes the way the uniform looks on him.

    There's a lot of that going around these days.

    The Newtown School Shooting And What It Should Tell Us

     

    A horrible, almost unimaginable tragedy occurred today at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, near Danbury, Connecticut.

    Somehow an armed gunman managed to sneak on campus armed with a handgun and a .223 rifle and gun down 27 people. That death toll includes 18 children, and the gunman. It's not known for certain at present whether he was shot by police officers or killed himself, although CBS is reporting the latter.

    The killer, identified as 24-year-old Adam Lanza, was the son of a female teacher at the school who was killed in the mass shooting. Most of the deaths occurred in her classroom. Ms. Lanza taught kindergarten.*

    Lanza's older brother is also in custody, for reasons unknown.

    Ironically, the school had just implemented new safety protocols. They included:

    • Locking all exterior doors during the day.
    • Visitors required to ring the doorbell and register at the office.
    • Photo ID and passes required for visitors.

    None of it helped.

    What also didn't help was that there was absolutely no provision for training and arming of qualified teachers or administrators. This atrocity occurred in a legally mandated gun-free zone.

    It's worth mentioning that these sort of mass killings in schools were unknown until President Clinton's Gun Free Schools Act was passed and signed by the president in 1994. That law required all states to put laws in place to prohibit firearms on school campuses, regardless of the state laws on firearms and concealed carry.

    The teachers and administrators at Sandy Hook Elementary obeyed the law. Some of them, and some of the innocent children they had charge of are dead because of it.

    The maniac who murdered these people could have cared less. He broke the law simply by taking a firearm onto school property even if a brief moment of sanity had asserted itself and he managed to never pull the trigger.

    The left will never acknowledge this basic truth. They will never admit to the connection between President Clinton's Gun Free Schools Act, the deaths today and the preventable deaths previously, and they will shamefully exploit this senseless tragedy for 'political capital' to try to further erode our rights to self defense..thus leading to more horrible and needless incidents like today's.

    They will never admit to any of it, because their agenda has nothing to do with 'preventing gun violence'. It has to do with attacking that most individual of the Bill of Rights, the right to preserve your life and that of your loved ones.

    The Bill of Rights was written for the express purpose of declaring what government may not do, and thus establishing the limits of governmental tyranny towards individuals. Without the right to choose to be armed, none of the other rights are defensible. That's exactly why the Left wants it gone. If they are able to ghoulishly use this tragedy to get their way, (and they will almost certainly try) the rest of those individual rights can be taken away easily.

    In 'The Prince', Machiavelli wrote 'To be disarmed is not only to be defenseless, but despised.' Like it or not, he was entirely correct.

    The wealthy, the members of the political elite and their families are amply protected by either private security or security paid for by the taxpayers. Legislation stripping away the protection of those they rule will only lead to more and more innocent deaths, as they're left defenseless.

    The killings at Sandy Hook are an example.

    Connecticut's gun laws are some of the strictest in the nation, modeled on neighboring New York state's statutes. None of these laws would have stopped Adam Lanza.

    He was known to the school's personnel, so he was allowed in without question. The firearms he used were registered not to him, but to his mother. In fact Lanza tried to obtain a rifle in his own name, but was denied because of his history of mental illness. So he simply stole his mother's weapons. He could just as easily decided to kill with a machete or with an explosive device.Or if he wanted a gun badly enough, he would have found a way to obtain one. Someone who really doesn't care what's legal and illegal will always find a way. In his state of mind, it didn't matter.

    So, how do we stop the Adam Lanzas of the future?

    We don't. A psychotic is a psychotic. Like a drunk driver, sometimes you just run into one. or they run into you.

    But there are things we can do to both minimize the damage and the occurrences.

    First, the media needs to clean up their collective act. We live in an 'American Idol' society, where everyone wants their 15 minutes of fame, especially younger teens growing up in what more and more seems a deliberate destruction of our culture and traditional values.

    A lot of the Adam Lanzas seem to want to essentially get that fame by committing what amounts to suicide publicly by taking a lot of innocent lives with them. Imagine the effect on wannabes and copycats if it was denied them?

    You can't stop the media from reporting on stories, unless it's something like Fast and Furious that doesn't fit the agenda.But there's nothing that says they have to mention the killer's name. The story can be fully reported without it.

    After all, the media has been known to go to enormous lengths to avoid mentioning race or ethnicity when it comes to crime or terrorism unless the perpetrator happens to be white.Why not eliminate that one detail of a name and deny potential Lanzas the added gratification of going out famous? Isn't it worth a try?

    The most important thing that would prevent more tragedies like Sandy Hook is repealing President Clinton's 1994 Gun Free Schools Act. Allow individual states to decide whether or not to allow trained teachers or administrators to have firearms on campus based on their gun laws and let's see the results after a few years.

    In Israel, schoolteachers and security guards are routinely armed and have received excellent training, almost all of them having been in the military. Most schools have contingency 'what if' plans.

     

    (photo courtesy of Powerline)

    In spite of the obvious dangers of terrorism and the fact that a large part of the population is in the reserves and has military assault weapons at home, with two exceptions there's never been an incident anything remotely like today's killings at Sandy Hook and both involved Arab terrorism.

    The Israelis learned a bitter lesson in 1974 when a patrol of Arab terrorists took over a school and murdered 25 hostages including 22 children using grenades and automatic weapons during the Ma'alot massacre.They took contingency measures and teachers were allowed to be armed in classrooms to try and prevent anything like that happening again.It worked.

    The last time anything like Ma'alot was attempted in Israel was at the Mercaz HaRav Yeshiva in 2008 before the security barrier was fully completed. An Arab terrorist broke in while the students were at their religious studies. And while 8 religious students were horribly slain, the death toll was mitigated when two IDF soldiers, former students who happened to be visiting the yeshiva took out the Arab killer with their personal firearms.

    Ask yourself how many of the children murdered today might be alive if there had been some armed and trained adults available to confront Adam Lanza in the only way possible.

    You don't defend the innocent against insanity and murder by legislation. You do it by being ready, willing and able to take up arms on their behalf to protect them.

    That's the message we should take away from what happened today at Sandy Hook Elementary.


    UPDATE: * The dinosaur media in their rush to get this story out got a number of things dead wrong.One of them concerned Adam Lanza's mother. She was apparently not a teacher at the school, and we now know she was murdered at home by her son in her bed before he went to the school.



    Rice Out, John Kerry In As Secretary of State?



    Now that UN Ambassador Susan Rice has withdrawn her name from consideration, the new favorite for the next Obama Secretary of State is none other than John Kerry.

    Interesting choice.

    Here's someone who committed, by his own admission, de facto treason during war time by meeting with North Vietnamese commissars in Paris to discuss strategies for undermining the U.S. war effort.

    It's de facto rather than actual de jure treason only because Vietnam wasn't a declared war and the legal definition of treason is limited to wartime.

    Then there's his phony testimony before congress during the Winter Soldiers hearing.

    In more recent activity, there's his active cooperation in attempts to sabotage the Iraq surge strategy, his consistently being proven to be on the wrong side of most issues during his tenure on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his assertion that only idiots end up serving in our military, his shilling for US aid for Syria's Basher Assad, insisting that Israel should be forced to cede half of Jerusalem and the strategic Golan to the Arabs....

    Yes, a real piece of work.

    On the other hand, he's probably a perfect choice to be a part of the Obama Administration. He's exactly their idea of what a secretary of state should be, at least since Susan Rice made too many enemies in the Senate on both sides of the aisle to get confirmed.

    Lurch will probably make it through just fine, although it would be only poetic justice if some senator pulled the same nonsense on him that he did during the eminently qualified John Bolton's nomination process as UN Ambassador during the Bush Administration.

    His performance in office is likely another matter entirely.

    The Council Has Spoken!! This Week's Watcher's Council Results

     

    The Council has spoken, the votes have been cast, and the results are in for this week's Watcher's Council match up.


    What happens when you finally decide enough is enough?

     



    This week's winner, Virginia Right! looks at that question in this week's winning entry, .Boehner and Cantor’s ‘War on Conservatives’ Causes Exodus of Conservatives from the GOP Here's a slice:

    Republicans did not lose this election because they were too far to the right. They lost because they alienated too many Conservatives by running yet another liberal candidate for President. Conservatives refused to vote for Mitt Romney. They didn’t vote for Barack Obama, that’s for sure. But the stayed home just as they did with John McCain. The only reason George W. Bush won election was that the Democrats managed to find two candidates that were even worse.

    And it was really hard to find a candidate worse than Obama, but Republicans have managed. Twice.

    The last few years I have been working within the Republican Party to help move things back to the path the founders, and more recently Ronald Reagan laid out. A number of my friends called me crazy for trying. I now admit that they were right and I was wrong.

    The leadership of the Republican Party on a National level can’t be fixed because they are too blind to realize they are broken.

    I tried. I gave it the best I had (along with a lot of other people). And I failed to make a dent

    On a personal level, I resigned my seat on my local Republican Executive Committee. I cannot in good faith continue to support a jobs program for Republicans like Eric Cantor that talk the talk, but the minute they fear for their jobs, they eliminate the only members of important committees that are more interested in fixing American than personal gain.

    Effective immediately, I no longer consider myself a Republican. I am a Conservative who was abandoned by the Republican Party on their rush to the left.

    On a State and Local level, I will continue to “caucus” with Republicans because many of them are still true Conservatives and have not yet reached the level of futility necessary to realize their efforts are wasted on noneffective leaders. While I will no longer serve on the Executive Committee of my local GOP organization, I will most likely continue as a member and will provide support and assistance for Conservatives within or without the group. At least until I run afoul of the requirement that you must grit your teeth and toe the party line even when they are heading in the wrong direction.


    In our non-Council category, the winner was Arson Ostrovsky in  The Commentator  with  Rejection and terror: Same old Palestinian choices  submitted by Joshuapundit. You'd think after all this time they'd learn better, wouldn't you?  Do read it.

    OK, OK, here are this week’s full results. Gay Patrot was unable to vote this week, but was not subject to the  usual 2/3 vote penalty:

    Council Winners



    Non-Council Winners



    See you next week! Don't forget to tune in on Monday AM for this week's Watcher's Forum, as the Council and their invited guests take apart one of the provocative issues of the day and weigh in...don't you dare miss it. And don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us Twitter..'cause we're cool like that!