Thursday, October 13, 2016

Trending Now At WoW! Magazine

Watcher of Weasels

Review: Kobalt Duel Power Inflator 

 Saving Our Public K-12 Schools? Here’s How 

 Trump’s accusers are Hillary hardliners — and is Bill even worse than we thought? 

 The delusion that there is no war on law enforcement

 Fox News Poll Another Skewed Pro Hillary Poll – +9 Democrats 

 Election 2016: Forget the candidates; focus on the issues!! 

 Trump Regains Lead in Brand New Rasmussen and LA Times Post Debate Polls

 Bob Dylan, Nobel Laureate

 Reuters/Ipsos Poll Samples 47% Democrats, 31% Republicans. +16% Skew Towards Dems

 Charlie Kirk — the conservative voice of the millennial generation 

 Selective Outrage Syndrome strikes Hillary Clinton campaign 

 Toxicology Results: Man Killed by Tulsa Officer was on PCP 

Saving The K-12 Schools? Here's How

 https://clipartoons.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/happy-school-kids-clipart-free.jpg

I read a recent article decrying the dysfunction of our public schools (no link, simply because I have no interest in appearing to criticize the author, who I'm sure means well).

After talking about the obvious attempt to indoctrinate children with a certain point of view and posting some of the usual dismal statistics - for instance, that only a third of our eighth-graders are proficient in reading, math, or much of anything else - his solution is for more parents to get involved with the public schools to try and change this sorry situation.

I'm afraid the author of this piece has misplaced expectations. The average public school could care less what parents think, although surprising exceptions sometimes occur on a case by case basis. Not only is there a great deal of money at stake in the process itself, but let's not forget that the Democrat Party gets a significant amount of its funding from the teacher's unions and this have, to put it mildly, a vested interest in keeping things exactly as they are.

That is, except in one area, discipline and providing a safe learning environment. They're more than willing to change there with a 'prompt' from President Obama's Department of Education, particularly in regards to one demographic that now has special rules designed to make suspending them for even the most egregious misbehavior 'racist' and simply not to be tolerated no matter what it does to the quality of the other kids' education.

Also to be considered is the current policy of allowing thousands of illegal aliens into public schools that aren't even literate in their own language let alone English and the effect this on the learning curve and the progress of the other children, especially when it comes to minority area schools.

Nothing's going to move on these areas no matter what, barring radical reform in Washington.

So while parents getting more involved at this point isn't likely to change things much if at all at this point, there is a fairly simple solution...

Get your children out of the public schools immediately before the mind rape is complete. That's exactly what we did.Not only did our kids receive a superb secular education (at more than one third less than the cost per pupil of our local big city school district), but what I call 'faith armor' which serves them very well in today's society.Yes, it cost, but the parochial schools frequently give tuition aid based on your income and in any event, this is your children's future you're talking about. So go to the parochial schools or other private schools. Get them out of the public schools.

Or home school them. Buy a curriculum (there are some excellent ones to choose from) and teach them at home. And that need not be very expensive, considering the cost of the alternatives.

I know parents who have banded together in small groups to share the cost of buying one of the fine the home school curriculums out there and even organized 'teaching shifts' to lessen the time factor if you're dealing with working parents. I even know one group of a dozen parents with kids the same basic age who actually split the cost of hiring a teacher and basic supplies. Which of course, is how it used to be done in America.

Aside from saving your kids, doing it this way saves others. Any honest teacher will admit that it's drilled into them that the most crucial part of the day is the morning head count, because it determines how much money the school gets from the feds. When your kids leave the system, that lessens the school's take and essentially starves the beast, along with voting against every local school bond.

That's what will save the schools as long as school choice is not an option and kids are used as pawns to feed and perpetuate a corrupt dysfunctional system. The Public schools will only take notice when their money/traffic decreases and they're forced to provide a better product.

That's  going to take time. But until real school choice becomes a reality, we're going to have to do what we can do to  destroy the system in order to remake it and  save it.

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Trending Now On WoW! Magazine

Watcher of Weasels


 The Republican War Against Trump Will Not Be Without Consequences 

 Trump And Mini-Trump At Huge Rally…Must See!

 Progressive v. Conservative ideologies, not the candidates, are the real drivers in this election 

 Rasmussen Poll Shows Trump Debate Performance Sunday Narrowing the Gap After Leaked Tapes 

 Roundup; Debate Reactions The Morning After

 Venezuela’s Maduro meets Putin in Turkey 

 Paul Ryan NEVER Supported Donald Trump. His Righteous Indignation is a Farce 

 Both Parties are Guilty of Manufactured Outrage against Trump 

 Band Blowhards 
 


The Republican War Against Trump Will Not Be Without Consequences



As I predicted when this all started, Trump's biggest problem isn't going to be the Democrats, but friendly fire from the rear.

Their hatred and opposition to Trump always came down to three issues..his being an outsider not of the political establishment, his opposition to globalization and his opposition to open borders and the supply of plentiful cheap labor it provides. 

For years, the party elites had wailed about the party's need to make the tent bigger, to reach out to minority voters and conservative crossover Democrats. Trump has done all that, but as usual, it turns out they were lying to us. What they  really wanted was some certified GOP product, one of their own who could creditably mislead the peasants until the election was over and it was business as usual again.

Trump was something they should have foreseen would arise after they received historic majorities in both houses of congress and ignored the very people who voted for them in  favor of aiding and abetting Barack Obama's policies, enjoying the perks of office and fattening their own wallets.

 https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjq39Rxzv1iqp46u2wiN0TxYpCc1tElAiOOZf_0V7DnH_je_j1WgrkbKrbcVCBR7NCV_cSKSXLNWNKuycdH39HzPGt_IHpcxcsZbOUrR7jVu406q6SZxsTvaHAdftKDxuvMM5PmQ/w1200-h630-p-nu/pigs_at_the_trough.jpg

Originally, they saw Trump's campaign as a joke or a publicity stunt, something to mock. But after Sarah Palin (whom they can't buy off and still fear) endorsed The Donald, they went into full attack mode flooded the GOP establishment candidates with money and unleashed their paid punditry in a frenzy of neverTrumper hatred.

It didn't work, and they're still too cottoned off from reality to understand why. In the end they spent almost half a billion dollars trying to knock Trump out of the primary race and failed miserably.

The hatred they have for Trump and what he represents is mirrored by their hatred for those tiresome peasants, the party's base. Trump's success against all odds has made it necessary for them to drop their cover and reveal themselves for the swine they really are.

The events of this last week are unconscionable.

Billy Bush, Hillary supporter George W,Bush's nephew handed over a 12 year old tape of what amounted to a private locker room conversation between him and Donald Trump, to the Washington Post who released it. And as we now see, Paul Ryan apparatchnik Dan Senor appears to have had a hand in getting this to the Post as well as advising them on how to use it for maximum effect afterwards. He would never have done that without Ryan's approval.

Immediately after tape's release, a slew of Republicans (many of whom were never supporting Trump anyway) jumped on the Democrat media bandwagon,helping to obscure the very real corruption' lies and greed of the Clintons in favor of demonizing Donald Trump and making that the headline story.

A number of them 'unendorsed' him, and there was open discussion about forcing him off the ticket. They were only waiting for him to be massacred at what was largely a rigged, pre-scripted 'debate' where exactly as I surmised, Mrs. Clinton had the questions in advance. The odious neverTrumpers were suddenly invigorated.

But as we all know, a funny thing happened on the way to Trump's political funeral. The script didn't go as planned, Trump triumphed and all the cooked polls and desperate punditry to the contrary couldn't change what the American people saw that night - the Clintons stripped bare and exposed for exactly what and who they are, a cancer in American politics and policy only concerned with gaining power and enriching themselves to the nation's detriment and expense.

And this puts these Republican and their paid shills in a dilemma. What to do? After jumping off the Trump train, they can't very well get back on, and for a number of them up for re-election, that could present problems, since Trump has a lot of popular support.

Some of them are simply keeping a low profile hoping this all goes away,but others, many of whom have done everything they can to derail Donald Trump are doubling down, particularly in the punditocracy.

The Trump movement is essentially a rebellion against the established order, and like our Forefathers, we now have our own class of Tories to deal with.

The lie they tell themselves is that after Trump's defeated, they will take over and rebuild the Republican Party, blaming Trump's loss on 'the trumpkins' or whatever other derogatory name they want to make up. Wat they're really saying is that it's the voter's fault, damn them. How dare they? But that aside, let's look at their prospects for 'rebuilding' shall we?

Out of a total of 31,183,841 votes cast in the GOP nominating campaign, the establishment, pro-globalist candidates combined garnered a grand total of around 26% of that number. Ted Cruz, who at least talked a good game about illegal migration while accepting the open border lobby's cash on the sly behind the scenes got 7,822,100 votes, or 25.1 percent.

And Trump? He set a record for primary votes - 14,015,993 votes, or 44.9 percent.

Does anyone think the people who voted against globalism, cronyism and open borders are going to go quietly back into the GOP fold and back the next establishment product? No, the vast majority will be gone for good, depend on it. They've been screwed for the last time.

These clowns with their fantasies are going to be trying to 'rebuild' the GOP with 30% or less of the current GOP electorate. And in terms of national politics, it will be worthless.

A president Hillary Clinton will see to that. She will appoint leftist judges galore, overturn Citizen's United, castrate the Second Amendment, destroy any vestige of voter ID laws,and use the IRS to target select GOP donors. She will use the FEC to hamstring and eventually eliminate conservative media and enforce the kind of speech codes already prevalent in the EU. Any criticism or even discussion of Islamism, Islamic terrorism or sharia will be illegal. Just ask Geert WIlders.

She will legalize millions of Democrat voting illegal aliens and boatloads of Muslim 'refugees' and continue to plant them in Red states, essentially turning them blue by using the Federal government to change the electorate. This is exactly what was done in California, so the model's already there.


The Republican Party will become even more of a joke than it already is, talking to itself and only surfacing at election time as a comic villain to keep the illusion of democracy going. In short, there won't be a Republican Party for our modern day Tories to rebuild.

Whether Mrs. Clinton is allowed to do this to our Republic or Donald Trump, against the odds is elected, make no mistake. We are going to remember that these creatures chose sides against us and against our country. We will not forget.

Trump And Mini-Trump At Huge Rally...Must See!



Here's Donald Trump at a huge rally in Wilkes-Barre, PA before a capacity crowd, when he sees a mini-Trump in the crowd and brings him onstage!

Then watch what happens...

Monday, October 10, 2016

Trending Now On WOW! Magazine

Watcher of Weasels

Roundup; Debate Reactions The Morning After 

 Hidden Hollywood: Gloria Swanson’s Wedding Night 

 The Debate – Trump’s Triumph 

 The Second 2016 Debate: Trumped! 

 What To Expect In Tonight’s Debate 

 Using Trump’s 12 Year Old Tape Shows The Contempt Hillary And Her Media Have For Us 

 Donald Trump and the Really Terrible, Horrible Horribly Bad Word 

 Leftist agitators looking to profit off racist, anti-cop, pro-violence T-shirts 

 Diversity will be the death of America, yes, literally 

 Donald Trump, Winner Of The 2016 Louis Renault Award!–UPDATED 

 Donald Trump, vulgarian, versus Hillary Clinton, corrupt incompetent 

 Andrew McCarthy: The Clinton Mandate 

 Sheriff David Clarke latest to feel Liberal tolerance

Roundup; Debate Reactions The Morning After

50 shades of grey

The media are doing their very best to spin this,cooking the polls. But anyone who watched the debate knows that Donald Trump won a stunning and unexpected victory.

The nearest thing I can compare this to is Richard Nixon's famous Checkers speech, when he ran as Eisenhower's running mate in 1952. It involved the press, who hated Nixon with a passion, busting Nixon for a so-called 'slush fund' set up by his supporters to cover certain expenses. Lots of politicians then and now have exactly the same setup(today, they're called 'leadership PACs'). Nixon's was fairly modest and innocuous, but because it was Nixon, the press went nuts, Eisenhower pretty much left Nixon twisting in the wind and it was fully expected that Nixon's political life was over and he would be forced off the ticket.

Instead, Nixon went on national TV, leveled with the American people and made his case directly to them. The perception of Richard Nixon - and the polls - changed virtually over night, and all of a sudden there was Ike Eisenhower talking about how proud he was of his running mate and how glad he was to have him.

Don't expect the media polls to reflect this, but things have changed for Trump overnight as well. here are a few snippets and reactions...



This is Joe Scarborough and Mika on MSNBC talking about the debate. Neither are Trump fans,  and I agree with both of them for a change. Scarborough is totally correct about the political impact of someone saying to Hillary's face what people have wanted to say to her for years, and Mika is totally right about the spineless nature of those Republicans who abandoned Trump over a locker room conversation.

Joe Scarborough seems to think no undecided voters were swayed, but below, Frank Luntz's focus group  of undecided voters seems to contradict him:






Rudy Giuliani was predictably happy over last night's debate...




And here, gives us an interesting sidelight on how the Clintons tried to pressure the debate committee...



El Rushbo was actually astonished by how well Trump did...Trump exceeded his expectations.



unsuccessfully, I might add.

As an example of how the media is trying to spin this, here is CNN's Dana Bash and Wolf Blitzer:



Ah hah hah! Trump never said he'd throw Hillary in jail. What he said is that he'd have his Attorney General appoint a special prosecutor to investigate her myriad scandals. And it's not just the e-mails and her illegal private server, or her willful and knowing destruction of evidence which had already been subpoenaed, AKA obstruction of justice. There's also the open collusion between the DOJ, the White House, the FBI, and Hillary herself in the matter. And there's also her pay to play while Secretary of State and the Clinton Foundation that deserve investigation. Mrs. Clinton's serial corruption is unique in American political life.

I acknowledge that in a way, this may be grandstanding on Trump's part because Obama would undoubtedly give Hillary a presidential pardon if Trump wins. But it needed to be said to underline for the American people exactly who Hillary Clinton is and what her record of 'public service' consists of.

A better term might be 'public servicing.'

Speaking of which, here's a CNN reporter caught on video coaching and steering their focus group:




The redoubtable Spengler sees Trump as winning what he calls the National Battle for Legitimacy:

The referee should have stopped it in the tenth. Punching at will, Donald Trump said, "Hillary used the power of her office to make $250 million. Why not put some money in? You made a lot of it while you were secretary of State? Why aren't you putting money into your own campaign? Just curious." Reeling and against the ropes, Clinton gasped that she supported ... the Second Amendment. It was a brilliant rhetorical device: under the rubric of campaign financing, Trump slipped in an allegation that Clinton corruptly enriched herself by using the power of her office for personal gain--and Clinton didn't even respond. That's a win by a knockout.

That's the decisive issue of the campaign: the corrupt machinations of a ruling elite that considers itself above the law, and the rage of the American people against the oligarchical ruling class that has pulled the ladder up behind it. Trump's bombshell below Clinton's waterline came at the end of the debate, well prepared by jabs at Clinton's erased emails and Bill's rapes. Trump used the "J" word--that is, jail. That was perhaps the evening's most important moment. This is not an election fought over competing policies but a struggle for legitimacy. A very large portion of the electorate (how large a portion we will discover next month) believes that its government is no longer legitimate, and that it has become the instrument of an entrenched rent-seeking oligarchy.

Here's the moment Spengler is talking about. Note the crowd reaction. Trump came up with a perfect encapsulation of Hillary Clinton's corruption in one terse sentence. All but the true believers know she should be wearing an orange jumpsuit right now:



John Hindraker over at Powerline, no Trump fan, saw it this way:

Some of the rats might want to consider returning to the ship. Donald Trump came through pretty well tonight, mainly because the focus was on the issues. As long as issues are being discussed, Trump wins.

The moderators came out of the box with questions about Trump’s 2005 video, which many people expected to be the centerpiece of tonight’s debate. The effort flopped, I thought. Bill and Hillary Clinton took appropriate shots. After ten or fifteen minutes the conversation moved on to the issues.

Thereafter, the moderators tried to help Hillary, and Trump appropriately complained a couple of times. But he got his licks in. As always, he was sometimes incoherent, but more often than not, he made more sense than Hillary, who was in full Nurse Ratched mode.

Happily, immigration figured prominently. Shockingly, in the first debate the moderator never mentioned the topic. Tonight, it was discussed extensively. That is a big plus for Trump. The exchanges on foreign policy were inconclusive, of course, but in general I think Trump did better. And there was even talk about Obamacare, which is great for Trump and Republicans. [...}

In short, Trump won. In my opinion, he won big. We will see whether it matters.

Is this something of a biased roundup? Well, maybe. But no more biased than what's going on at CNN,The WAPO, Memeorandum or Real Clear Politics right now. One thing I did do was to quote people who are admittedly not Trump fans but who seemed to have changed their minds after last night. And annihilate one of today's common talking points by the Clinton media, an outright lie about Trump saying he'd put Hillary in jail if he wins.

Selah.

Sunday, October 09, 2016

The Debate - Trump's Triumph

credit: natdionalreview.com

Tonight's debate proved that the obituaries for Donald Trump's campaign were...premature. No matter how the media tries to spin this, Donald Trump won hands down.

He did it by doing exactly what I predicted he was going to have to do:

Here's how Trump wins if he's learned from the first debate. He has to ignore the agenda that has been set up and calmly but clearly attack Mrs. Clinton where's she's vulnerable; on the e-mail scandal, the Clinton Foundation, her enabling of her sexual predator of a husband, and her repeated lies to the American people. He will, if he's smart ignore the 'moderator's' attempts to shush him and have some nice one line zingers of his own to respond to Mrs. Clinton. If he gets questioned about the twelve year old illegally leaked 'sex' conversation, he should respond that he's already addressed that, and compared to the problems facing the country and compared to Mrs. Clinton's history on women and her plan to allow thousands of unvetted Muslims into America, this is a non-issue.
In other words, he has to upset the carefully planned script Mrs. Clinton and the 'moderators' have arranged, go off script and tie things to his own talking points and agenda at every opportunity.


Like I said, the Donald's a quick learner. That's exactly what he did.

The two 'moderators' Anderson Cooper and Martha Radatz are partisan Democrats who did their very best to push Mrs. Clinton over the line. They allowed her to filibuster and go over her time and then refused to let Trump respond, something he pointed out live and on the air. They interrupted him far more than Mrs. Clinton, and more important than the number of interruptions was where they occurred. But their efforts were not as effective as they wanted them to be because Trump simply wouldn't meekly follow their script. His answers always went back to his points he needed to make; Hillary's e-mails, the Iran Deal, her serially corrupt behavior, her  being owned by the special interests, the failure of ObamaCare and her dishonesty.

One of the sweetest moments was when Hillary Clinton accused Donald Trump of lying about her e-mails and the audience actually laughed at her. And a few moments later, after the Donald said that as president he would consider appointing a special prosecutor to investigate the e-mail scandals and the Clinton Foundation, Mrs. Clinton cracked, "Well, it's lucky Donald Trump isn't in charge of law enforcement, "  Trump responded with the best zinger of the night, one that will stick in everyone's head:

"Or you'd be in jail." It got the biggest applause and cheers of the night, and the two 'moderators' had to work hard to shush it.

Donald Trump reminded America of exactly whom Hillary Clinton is, who she's owned by and her disgraceful record in public service. He disposed of the issue of that illegally hacked private conversation quickly and efficiently even though Anderson Cooper  and Martha Radatz did their best to keep that ball in the air.  After saying he apologized twice, he reminded us all that words are one thing and actions, like the serial behavior of  Bill Clinton and his enabler Mrs. Clinton is something quite different...with Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones and other  victims or the Clinton sitting right in the front row where they couldn't be missed.



This is actually very much how Trump operates. In the first debate, he avoided going there because Chelsea Clinton was sitting there and he felt it was the wrong thing to do. When the Clinton media illegally obtained and made political capital out of a locker room style conversation Trump had with George W. Bush's nephew Billy 12 years ago, Trump had no compunctions about hitting back, and he did so effectively.

Trump's victory tonight is even more impressive because it was a comeback and as Trump himself said, "It's three against one."

This wasn't how this was supposed to go at all, but the very fact that it focused on issues because of the questions gave Donald Trump an advantage they didn't foresee. And not only did  he rise to the challenge, he did it in a calm, presidential manner.

Even better, this was Hillary's last chance to put Trump away. The last debate will be 'moderated' by FOX's Chris Wallace, who's a Democrat but one who will at least try to ensure a modicum of fairness.

Team Clinton's only weapons left are voter fraud, their pet media and renegade 'conservatives' and Republicans.  After tonight, America has a clear picture of the candidates.

To steal a phrase from Powerline's John Hinderaker, some of the rats might want to consider returning to the ship.

My live blogging notes...

Oct 9, 19:37

What do you respect about each other?


HRC; I respect his children. Granny Cankles! blames Trump for divisive rhetoric. Claims she has tried to 'get away from the personal.' Ri-ight.


Trump: Thanks Hillary for compliment. Respects Hillary as a fighter.

Oct 9, 19:35

Energy:

Trump: mentions EPA ridiculous regs, mentions clean coal and coal miner's jobs.


Wants to bring good blue collar jobs BACK TO AMERICA!


HRC: Claims Trump is using Chinese steel...doesn't mention that US made steel is scarce and more expensive thanks to EPA regs.


'Climate change' of course.

Oct 9, 19:30

Ahh the Supreme Court....

HRC: I want to see judges who ' knows how the real world works.' Wants Citizen's united, voter ID laws repealed. In other words, she wants hard leftists.


Trump: I want to about Judges like Scalia. Judges who will respect the Constitution, 2nd amendment.

Mentions big money going to Clinton from special interests. Mention play for play.

Oct 9, 19:24

Trump mentions Benghazi and the 3AM phone call Hillary ignored.

I can't believe Cooper just ask HRC if she thought Trump would be a disciplined leader! What a tool.

Oct 9. 19:18

To the inner cities.


Trump points out that Hillary and the Dems have done NOTHING. Mentions the 'deploreables' quote when asked in he will be president to all the people.

Hillary doesn't really address the question, just cites the usual treacle. Blames Trump for increase in bullying! Mentions tone and tenor which she blames Trump for, of course.

Trump replies  that Hillary has had a real part in the divisiveness.

Oct 9, 19:16

Raddatz asks Hillary if she would use U.S. forces to save the 'rebels.' Yeah, she would . Doesn't really address Trump's points.


Will they let him respond? Let's see.


Nope, Trump gets shushed. He points out that they let Hillary go a full minute over her time but keep cutting him off. It's obvious...


Oct 9, 19:11 

Syria is the topic now. Hillary just lied about Aleppo. Those 'rebels' she talks about are al Nusrah, an al-Qaeda affiliate.


Trump's response is excellent. He points out who these rebels are and that Russia, Assad, and Iran are killing ISIS. Mentions the Iran deal. Mentions how we now broadcast our strategy, which is stoo-pid. Says he wants tpo get along with Russia to fight ISIS.

Oct 9, 19:05

Trump gets a laugh from the audience when he said 'if you were an effective senator, you would have done something about these abuses you claim you want to fix.'

Hillary gets a long filibuster on her record...Trump is not allowed to respond.

Oct 9, 19:02

Hillary is now talking about how she closed corporate loop holes, spouting the same garbage OBama did about 'exempting anyone make $250K per year.' I guess we saw how that worked out. Basically, she's into 'eat the rich.'

Trump admits he took a loss and used it...and makes the point that Hillary isn't going to do anything about stuff like that because the people taking advantage of the tax code are her donors.


Oct 9, 18:55
Good reply from Trump on how he'd reform the tax code and cut them on the middle class and across the board, and that Clinton will RAISE them. True, that.

Oct 9, 18:54

Hillary Clinton is now lying about herWikileaks quote 'You have to have a public and a private position."

And now she's playing the Russian card, claims Trump is working with the Kremlin.

Trump gets the audience laughing about Hillary comparing herself to Abe Lincoln. Disposes of the Kremlin canard.

"Abe was honest, not like you!"


Good! Mentions Soros and Buffett taking huge tax breaks. Buffet owes over a billion in taxes he hasn't paid.

Oct 9, 18:49

Trump isn't letting the 'moderators' push him around, is insisting on equal time.


Oct 9, 18:47

Ah, here's the Muslim!

Trump handles the 'Islamophobia' vs. security well. Reminds everyone about recent terrorist attacks and that Hill and Obama won't say 'radical Islamic terrorism'

Mentions Kahn, lies that we've had Muslims in America since George Washington, usual platitudes. Will Trump bring up her Muslim Brotherhood ties? Accuses Trump of being a recruiter for ISIS.


Trump brings up IRAQ! Says Kahn would be alive if not for Clinton voting for Iraq war. Mentions Hillary's saying she wants to bring in lots more unvetted Muslims. Pretty good.


Hilary admits that's what she wants, but claims she's going to have 'better vetting'

Oct 9, 18:28

Trump reminds everyone that Hillary started the birther issue.


Oct 9, 18:38 

Hillary's response ignores the cost of ObamaCare. She actually said that Medicare works in spite of the vast fraud.


Good answer by Trump  to Cooper's question about pre-existing conditions. 'ObamaCare was a fraud.'

Oct 9, 18:34 

Those people on ObamaCare would have been on Medicaid anyway. Now, she's lying about what a good thing ObamaCare is. Claims she can 'fix it.'


Trump's response: ObamaCare's a disaster. 'Their way of fixing it is to ask congress for more money.' He explains in detail the right way to do healthcare. Competition, erasure of state lines, tailored plans.


Oct 9, 18:31

They certainly got off the subject of the e-mails quick!
Brings up Wikileaks on Bernie Sanders..brings up deleted e-mails.


Says he will investigate Hillary if elected!!!!! YEAH!


Hillary gets laughed at by audience when she calls Trump a liar about e-mails.


And when she says 'we're lucky Trump isn't in charge of law enforcement'


Trump replies to wild applause -"Or you'd be in jail.


Hillary got a long response...but Trump isn't letting her get away with it. Neither is the audience.

Oct 9, 18:22 by Rob Miller
They're giving more than two minutes to Hillary's response.

Oct 9, 18:21
Good ol' Martha Raddatz...back to the tape.


So Trump's going there...Bill and Hill and their sexual abuse tag team...words and action, there's a difference. Well done, Donald.

(applause, shushed by the moderator)

Hillary amazingly uses 'they go low, you go high.' Applause, not shushed by the moderators of course.

Oct 9, 18:18

Notice how they tried to keep Trump from responding. But he refused to let them sandbag him...good.

Trump wisely points out that Hillary is allowed to bloviate but he's being cut off.


Oct 9, 18:15
Hillary is digging into Trump's suppossed denigration of women. Will Trump hit back?

Oct 9, 18:14
first Follow up by A Cooper..disposed of by Trump mentioning ISIS, etc. And back to his main points of national security and border security.

Ahh, Hillary attacks Trump's fitness to serve

Oct 9, 18:09
Oh good, Trump mentions ObamaCare and Iran deal!

Oct 9, 18:09 
Obama said the same thing...'I want to be everyone's president, unite everybody.'

Oct 9, 18:07
Hillary a model? Lie, cheat and steal???

Oct 9, 18:06 2nd Presidential debate Live Blog
Hillary's drugged out again

What To Expect In Tonight's Debate

File:Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during United States presidential election 2016.jpg

(photo courtesy of WikiCommons, Flickr and Gage Skidmore)

Here's what's likely coming in tonight's debate.

This is Mrs. Clinton's last chance to put away Donald Trump, since the last debate will be 'moderated' by Democrat Chris Wallace, who works for Fox and can be expected to at least provide a modicum of fairness.

Tonight's debate will be 'moderated' by Anderson Cooper and Martha Raddatz, both very partisan Democrats. And they will both be striving to avoid winding up like Matt Lauer. Ms. Raddatz, you might remember was the 'moderator' for the 2012 Vice Presidential debate where she leaned heavily on Paul Ryan while allowing Joe Biden to behave like an eight-year-old who'd missed a few days' dose of Ritalin.

It's a town hall type event, which will feature selected undecided voters asking Trump and Hillary questions. It goes without saying that just like the last debate, Mrs. Clinton will have received all the questions in advance, and will know which questions she'll be getting and which one's Trumps getting, so she can have carefully prepared and rehearsed answers to the former and suitable one line zingers to the latter. She will also be wearing her little earpiece again so she can receive backstage reminders and remember her lines.

And she will be jacked up on enough drugs to allow her to last for 90 minutes. She dropped out of site for almost a week after the last one, so she could dry out.

Trump's questioners will likely underline the Democrat talking points, and they won't be undecided at all. Mrs. Clinton's questioners will be partisan Democrats.

Trump's microphone will likely be tampered with again so the audience can't hear him and cheer in response. Any applause he happens toget will be quickly shushed by the 'moderators' while any applause Mrs. Clinton gets will be allowed to continue, just like last time with Lester Holt. Trump will be challenged and interrupted frequently, while Mrs. Clinton will not.

Here's how Trump wins if he's learned from the first debate. He has to ignore the agenda that has been set up and calmly but clearly attack Mrs. Clinton where's she's vulnerable; on the e-mail scandal, the Clinton Foundation, her enabling of her sexual predator of a husband, and her repeated lies to the American people. He will, if he's smart ignore the 'moderator's' attempts to shush him and have some nice one line zingers of his own to respond to Mrs. Clinton. If he gets questioned about the twelve year old illegally leaked 'sex' conversation, he should respond that he's already addressed that, and compared to the problems facing the country and compared to Mrs. Clinton's history on women and her plan to allow thousands of unvetted Muslims into America, this is a non-issue.

In other words, he has to upset the carefully planned script Mrs. Clinton and the 'moderators' have arranged, go off script and tie things to his own talking points and agenda at every opportunity.

If he does that, he's going to win in spite of the odds. As I pointed out earlier, he actually did a lot better in the first debate than the media's cooked polls indicated.

So we'll see.

Using Trump's 12 Year Old Tape Shows The Contempt Hillary And Her Media Have For Us

 http://russia-insider.com/sites/insider/files/b950dfa243864c50139bddec928a7b8e.jpg

The latest 'scandal' the media are using to demonize Donald Trump is an illegally obtained recording of a private conversation of Donald Trump's with Billy Bush, then host of the 'Access Hollywood' show that contains a fair amount of locker room style talk about women...from 12 years ago.

Billy Bush, by the way just happens to be former president George W. Bush's nephew..and as we all know, the former president and his entire family are supporting the open borders Mrs. Clinton. Billy Bush apparently alerted the Washington Post or perhaps even sent a copy from NBC's digital library to the paper.

And of course that, not the contents of new Clinton e-mails, the Wikileaks Podesta e-mail document drops showings Hillary's real positions on national security and open borders, or the revelations of the FBI's outright collusion with Clinton aids like Cheryl Mills during their feeble investigation is the bi-ig story.

And it shows exactly the kind of contempt the Clinton's and their media have for us, especially for women.

A lot of the media frenzy is indeed being driven by women columnists and commentators, and that's no accident.

By all means, these media figures and people that think like them should vote for Hillary Clinton, who bullied, threatened and brutalized women her husband raped and sexually harassed. Certainly a 12 year old private locker room conversation leaked illegally counts for more than that, let alone Mrs. Clinton's serial corruption, her compromising America's national security to hide her crooked deals when she was secretary of state and her role in destabilizing the Middle East!

Mrs. Clinton has also promised to bring thousands of Muslims to America from the most misogynist countries on earth, where Muslim women are considered property and infidel women are considered prey, or in the famous words of one imam, 'uncovered meat'. Young women need only look at Europe to see how flooding a western open society with these kind of migrants ends up*, and those women with fantasies of being gang raped should definitely vote for Hillary.

 https://counterjihadnews.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/swedish_rape_victim.jpg

http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2016/01/ll.jpg?itok=IG7_va0T

If I were a woman, these facts would be a lot more important to me than a 12 year old illegally obtained private conversation, but your results may differ.

And while we're on the subject, let's be honest about something Trump said during this conversation that is 110% true, and the one part of the conversation that really offends a number of women; that many of them avidly welcome advances from men with wealth, power and celebrity. I dare anyone to deny it.

To me, it's pretty natural that many women would behave in that manner, because it's wired into their DNA. From the earliest days of prehistory, women were attracted to the successful hunter, the strongest most virile warrior, the powerful leader, the prosperous farmer with the best land and crops, the wealthy trader and merchant. Men like these were seen as the most likely to breed healthy offspring, protect women and their offspring and to provide for them. And it was also a way of increasing a woman's own social status. Later on, well known artists were added to the list since they also tended to be wealthy or at least well off and because artists, writers and musicians have their own mystique for many women.

That women would fawn over such advances by someone like Donald Trump who combines all three elements of wealth, power and celebrity ought to be no big surprise.

Another thing that bears mentioning is that this is a twelve year old conversation. Has anyone out there not changed in the last 12 years? I know I have. So has Donald Trump And most Evangelicals leaders know it too, and understand the issues at stake. As one Christian commentator put it, this is one election where Christians don't get to stay home.

One thing this obscene circus has done is to re-legitimize the NeverTrumpers. Establishment Republicans like John McCain, Paul Ryan and John Kasich have already jumped on the NeverTrumper wagon, while the execrable Bill Kristol and the paid clowns at the NRO are beside themselves with ecstasy at the thought of being relevant again. However, since none of these people were going to vote for Trump anyway, there's not much damage done except to themselves. Many Republicans up for election have found out the hard way that distancing themselves from Trump and his followers is a really dumb move. And their attempt to help Hillary Clinton, who harassed and brutalized the various women Bill Clinton  sexually assaulted and harassed makes their objections even more ludicrous and fake.

Finally, here's something else this latest move tells us about team Hillary. Cooked polls notwithstanding, they're running scared.

The last illegal release of one of Trump's tax returns was supposed to do the trick, allowing them to brand him the way they branded Mitt Romney. To their shock, it didn't work and people actually admired Trump for being smart enough to use the system for his advantage. If this last gambit doesn't work, they'll be forced to rely on a rigged 'debate' and voter fraud. And Trump. a quick learner, has probably learned what he's going to have to do to combat that...create his own agenda and speak to the American people rather than allowing the 'moderators', their hand picked 'questioners' and Mrs. Clinton to do so.

This entire melange - the cooked polls, the dire commentary and the fake scandals - are designed for one objective to get Trump supporters discouraged and make them stay home. What Team Clinton and the Establishment fear more than anything else is the wild card of Trump supporters who will be voting for the first time in years, and the ones who say what's expected of them publicly but will do something quite differently in the voting booth. There's no way of tracking them and most of the polls are studiously ignoring them since a lot of them aren't likely voters.

Voter fraud in places like Philadelphia might gift some states to Mrs. Clinton if it's close, especially Blue run states.But the election is going to be won or lost by how many people fed up with America's decline show up.

If the majority of Americans actually believe that a 12 year old private conversation actually outweighs the damage the corrupt Clintons will do to America by stacking the Supreme Court with young leftists, plundering what's left of the country's wealth, gutting the Second Amendment, legalizing millions of illegal migrants and bringing boatloads of Muslim 'refugees' to America they will get what they deserve.

Ultimately, it remains in G-d's hands. We'll see whether that old saying about G-d watching out for children, drunks and the United States of America still rings true. We will learn whether we are worthy of of the Republic our forefathers bequeathed to us, or whether we have become so decadent and servile that we are willing to swallow the contempt our self appointed elites have for us.

* sample search topics for the unaware: takfir, Cologne gang rapes, Sweden as rape capitol, rapes in Europe by refugees, 'rapefugees', etc.

Friday, October 07, 2016

Britain Suspends Aid to Palestinians Over Terrorism Funding

Flag of Britain

Britain's The Sun is reporting that the UK has suspending millions of pounds in foreign aid payments to the Palestinian Authority because of 'serious allegations' that the money is being used to fund terrorism.

Britain's International Development Secretary Priti Patel has ordered a freeze pending an investigation, after furious British MPs demanded action following revelations that UK aid supposedly paying for civil servants in Gaza was being transferred to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).

Aside from funding “salaries” for families of suicide bombers, convicted vehicle terrorists and knife wielding killers attacking Israelis, various 'operations' are being bankrolled.In one instance, a Hamas master bomber was allegedly given £100,000 by the PLO.

The Department for International Development has admitted previously that the PLO makes “social welfare” provisions for terrorist prisoners and their families but at th etime, denied that UK funds are being used this way.

But according to The Sun, the Department has finally conceded that many of the so-called civil servants were actually involved in terrorism,or as the Department put it, ' doing other jobs' while receiving UK taxpayers’ funds.

The decision affects £25 million in cash is being withheld this year – a third of the total aid sent to the Palestinian Authority. While the majority supposedly goes to charities in the region, there have also been repeated instances of these funds being diverted as well since a lot of these charities employ local Arabs as staff members and any real accounting is difficult.

The Palestinian Authority is perpetually asking for more donor aid, claiming to be broke. Yet Mahmoud Abbas continues to spend six percent of the PA’s annual budget to pay $4.5 million a month to jailed terrorists, another $6.5 million to their families, $1.2 million to Sufa Arafat as a 'pension' so she can live a luxurious lifestyle in the ritziest part of Paris and $16 million on a brand new presidential compound. And that doesn't count Abbas's annual salary of $12 million, or the money he and his Fatah cronies siphon off the aid money for themselves.*

Senate Republicans introduced legislation just days ago to cut off all financial aid to 'Palestine' until the Secretary of State certifies that the Palestinian Authority is no longer using aid money to reward and finance terrorists.

Good luck with that, since Abbas has admitted he's repeatedly lied about the matter!

Still these are positive steps, particularly with the UK. Can it be that the world's oldest running con game is finally starting to come to an end?

We'll see.



*Both Mohammed Rashid, Arafat's former finance chief and Mahmoud Dahlan, former PA security chief have publicly accused Abbas of embezzling $3.1 billion U.S.

Wednesday, October 05, 2016

Forum: What Should U.S. Policy Be In The Middle East?

 

Every week, the WoW! community and our invited guests weigh in at the Watcher's Forum, short takes on a major issue of the day, the culture, or daily living. This week's question:What Should U.S. Policy Be In The Middle East?

Laura Rambeau Lee,  Right Reason :Our leaders need to acknowledge that what is happening in the Middle East is not a simple clash of cultures. We must recognize this is a fight between good and evil and address it as such. Whether we like it or not we have been drawn into this war and to fight it successfully we have to be all in. We have seen the restraint exercised under the Obama administration in Iraq and Afghanistan allow our enemy to grow and expand its influence as radicalized jihadists commit acts of horror, barbarism, and terror across the world. We cannot do nothing as another Holocaust unfolds. We must refuse to accept a new normal and not become desensitized to these horrific attacks on innocents which are occurring with greater frequency.

It’s too easy to turn a blind eye to the barbaric acts radical Islamists are committing and accept the progressive narrative that this is not true Islam, and that Islam is a religion of peace. Our policy should be to strengthen alliances with other countries who understand the existential threat a growing Islamic State means to every country in the entire world and not just in the Middle East.

Our next president will be challenged with restoring and rebuilding our military, both morally and physically. If we continue on this downward trend we will be unable to fight and destroy this enemy. We should use every tool at our disposal to seek out and kill this enemy of the free world. Without strong leadership from the United States the world will be unable to defend itself against this evil. I hate to imagine a world where evil is the victor.

JoshuaPundit: Hmmm! Well, in order to have policy, you have to have goals. Our goals to date, as near as I can figure them out appear to be empowering Islamists at home and abroad, appeasing the Saudis and the Emirates on one hand and Iran on the other, and bringing as many Muslims into America as possible along with periodically lying to the  American people that the violence they see going on almost daily has nothing to do with Islam!

These appear to have been the goals of our last three presidents, but somehow they seem...well,counterproductive and self defeating to all of us except for the personal fortunes of certain presidents, their families and closely allied groups of elites.

So I guess I'll have to come up with my own list, won't I?

They divvy up to our actions at home and our actions abroad. Loosely stated,they include permanent and realistic steps to secure America's national security, a return to what's worked before in these situations, really purging America of what some people call radical Islam and I call Islamism, Salafism and Wahhabism among other things, and giving the American people a realistic view of what Islam actually is to most Muslims globally, as opposed to your nice next door neighbor.

At home, along with zealously guarding our borders, we need to rescind the refugee/permanent residency status of most if not all of the Muslims Obama brought in by gaming our laws, since the Administration has finally admitted they haven't even been vetting them. Citizenship given these people during at least the past 8 years also needs to be revoked on a case by case basis, since it was given by executive order without any normal vetting in most instances.

We likewise need to reopen the second Holy Land Foundation trial, which would put most of the leaders of CAIR, MPAC, NAIT, ITNA, and most of the other Muslim Brotherhood fronts in jail. No double jeopardy issue there either, since they were never tried in the first place but undoubtedly would have been with a non-Islamist friendly administration. The Brotherhood itself and its associated front groups should be declared terrorist entities and outlawed as such, and any federal employees with Brotherhood ties, particularly in law enforcement, the military, the DOJ, State Department and DHS should be investigated thoroughly and dismissed as necessary.

Mosques, especially those owned by ITNA should be placed under major surveillance, and the imams thoroughly vetted. Jihad mosques should be shut down and their imams deported. A major campaign should be launched among American Muslims to turn in jihadis in their midst and it needs to be explained publicly exactly why it's in their best interest to do so.

Public school and university curriculums should be rigorously vetted for Islamist propaganda that presents a dawa-friendly presentation of Islam and its history as opposed to a balanced, reality based one. Schools that refuse to comply would lose all federal funding. Call it reverse indoctrination if you like.

Foreign funding of religious entities in America should be prohibited, at least from a list of designated countries . So should any compensation whatsoever to Federal employees from a foreign government (or at least designated governments) for a period of 20 years following their leaving government service. That should effectively end the retirement 'magic carpet' pension plan now funded by the Saudis and The Emirates enjoyed by so many of our public 'servants' after they leave office after doing these foreign governments' bidding during their tenure. That  includes our presidents.

Abroad, similar steps are necessary


The first thing we have to realize is that we have three potential and/or actual allies in the region - Israel, Egypt under al-Sissi and The Kurds. The rest are superfluous, especially since we no longer need their oil. We need to empower our allies so they'll look after our interests in the region and to have marginal relations with the others at best.

The biggest problem we have is not with the Arabs but with what's been called the Northern Tier, the three non-Arab states of Turkey, Iran and Pakistan. One of them has nuclear arms, another is rapidly getting there thanks to the negligence and appeasement of two consecutive presidents and the third had the largest conventional army in Europe.

Iran is the most deadly of the three at this point, thanks to the funding and the appeasement they received from President Barack Hussein Obama. Contrary to the lies we were told, Iran still regards America as the 'Great Satan' and has regarded itself at war with America since 1979. And these are by no means rational actors with any fear of Mutually Assured Destruction, as anyone who knows anything about Iran's Twelver Sect that dominates the country would tell you. The Hidden Imam is actually supposed to arrive to conquer the world for Shi'ite Islam in the midst of war and apocalypse.

Obama's appeasement has cemented the current regime in place, has made them even more aggressive, and has given them billions to fund their illegal nuclear weapons program and improve their conventional military.What we've done is the equivalent of giving a mentally unstable criminal a loaded gun.

Unfortunately, this makes the job of fixing the problem a lot messier than it would have been if we had done it in the second Bush Administration or had not threatened the Israelis to stop them from doing the job for us.

As it stands now Iran's nuclear facilities and major military bases need to be taken out completely, even if it takes tactical nukes to do it as it will undoubtedly do in hardened sites like Fordow. Their navy, such as it is, needs to be destroyed, as does their natural gas and oil infrastructure including Kharg Island, Iran's oil tanker 'filling station.'

This is necessary so that the same problem doesn't crop up again for some time. Iran without oil and gas has no interest for China, and while Russia might be upset at one less market for its arms industry, a Russia with better relationship with a new U.S. president might actually be willing to work out any differences, particularly if we're smart enough not to invade with ground troops and take over a country on Russia's border. Certainly they aren't going to get into a war they cannot afford over Iran. Nor can Russia afford to rebuild Iran for it's own purposes.

Aside from the deterrent effect, Iran's reversal of fortune at our hands will also send a valuable message to other bad actors in the region. It works like that with honor/shame cultures - at your throat or at your feet.

Turkey is a more difficult problem in its own way, since the West made them a NATO ally at a far different time when the rulership of the country was quite different different. They simply aren't allies in the usual sense of the word anymore, and Ataturk's secularization of the country has essentially been reversed by ErdoÄŸan and the AKP.

That means lessening ties with the current regime without actually severing them. We should get out of our of our base in Turkey at Incerlik (you know, the one the Turks surrounded with their military and cut off power and water to for a week or so) as soon as possible. And it also means telling ErdoÄŸan in no uncertain terms that he needs to get his military out of that juicy slice of Northern Syria he just seized and stop brutalizing the Kurds. Turkey's economy is already shaky and the mention of possible sanctions as well as the recent example of our preemption of Iran should make it an easy decision for ErdoÄŸan. ErdoÄŸan also needs to be reminded of Article Five in NATO's charter, just in case he gets any crazy ideas of following the old Ottoman route of conquest into the Balkans with his army.

With ErdoÄŸan's withdrawal, we could then assist the Kurds in establishing their new state, Kurdistan, as a U.S. client in Northern Syria and the adjacent areas of Iraq. It's something we should have done twenty years ago.

As a side note, the war on ISIS is essentially lost, or at least moving to a different phase. While Mosul and Rakka can possibly be taken eventually, ISIS has infiltrated the 'refugees' coming to Europe,Canada and the U.S. and the war is going to shift to counter terrorism domestically. As odious as Basher Assad is, he's a safer bet then the 'moderate' jihadis Obama's funding and arming. Syria, like Iraq is destined to become a failed and possibly truncated state. Aside from rescuing what's left of Syria and Iraq's Christians, there's little we can do to prevent that, nor should we. Definitely, we shouldn't have any ground troops there.

Our foreign policy in the Middle East should be to protect and support our allies and to confine ourselves to marginal relationships with any other actors.

Stately McDaniel Manor: The story goes, if memory serves, that when he served as Secretary of State, George Schultz would initiate newly minted ambassadors by inviting them into his office and asking them to point out their country on a world map. They would invariably point out the nations they had been assigned, whereupon Schultz would point to America and exclaim: “No. This is your country.”

Presumably, the point was not lost on such highly educated individuals. It has surely been lost for at least the last eight years.

Diplomacy is a prelude to war, an attempt to prevent war, a logical extension of Carl Von Clausewitz’s aphorism:

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.”

Unless our diplomacy is backed up by the very real threat of bad consequences for our enemies, including war, diplomacy degenerates to what we have witnessed under Hillary Clinton and John Kerry: “tell us what you want and please don’t embarrass us too much.”

We have, if Donald Trump wins, a very long period of rebuilding. Here’s a brief list:

Foreign policy must be about what is best for America, first and foremost. Altruism comes in second, at best.

Our enemies must fear us--really fear us.

Our allies must know they can trust us.

We must never enter into a military alliance--or remain in one--unless we are willing to honor all of its obligations. Make no agreement we won’t honor, and honor all we make.

Terrorist armies/nations must be destroyed.

Every terrorist must be killed.

Nations that help terrorists must be seriously punished.

Terrorists must be captured and interrogated. The information obtained must be carefully corroborated and used.

The Iranian regime must be destroyed, not only for the American lives they’ve already taken, but for the lives they intend to take in the future.

The threat of war with America must equal the certain and rapid threat of obliteration, death for the leaders of our enemies, and destruction for their regime.

The world must know that an attack on Israel, Taiwan, or other terrorist targets--if they survive until January, 2017--is an attack on America.

No idiots, weaklings, corruptocrats, and self-important twerps shall represent the United States in Diplomacy.

Any attack on our diplomatic personnel or facilities must be punished, rapidly and brutally.

The presumption that everything Barack Obama did while president in foreign policy was harmful to America must guide our efforts. Everything he did must be undone unless it can be shown to actually be to the benefit of America.

For starters, shoring up our ties with Israel should be at the top of our list.

Barack Obama who has refused for eight years to acknowledge that Jerusalem has all but destroyed our alliance with Israel.

Puma By Design : For starters, shoring up our ties with Israel should be at the top of our list.

Barack Obama who has refused for eight years to acknowledge that Jerusalem has all but destroyed our alliance with Israel.

Keeping in mind the adage, “that if you dance to the music….,” Netanyahu should remain cautious. Obama closing in on the final days in the White House is bound to do something unseemly, something which Israel may one-day regret for example, a caveat Obama failed to mention when negotiating $38 billion in military aid over the next 10 years.

Then there is Iran who have summer warned that "Hezbollah has 100,000 missiles that are ready to hit Israel to liberate the occupied Palestinian territories if the Zionist regime repeats its past mistakes." continues to step up their game as more about the Iran nuclear deal is made public.

Iran’s Zolfaqar tactical ballistic missiles are “capable of evading jamming signals in electronic warfare” is scheduled to become operational in March 2017 and able to reach Israel.

Iran must be reined in but Barack Obama, their enabler has created a monster while at the same time weakening the United States and our military.

Not good for Israel, not good for the Middle East which is a disaster courtesy of POTUS44. As a result, POTUS45 will have his hands full.


The Glittering Eye : It's hard to come up with a plan that's shorter than booklength. Here are the highlights of what I think we should and shouldn't do with respect to the Middle East:

- we should stop supporting Islamists. That includes the radicals we're supporting in Syria, Turkey, and the Saudis. The present Iranian government cannot be our friends.
- we should maintain a lower profile, generally.
- end the drone war
- maintain a force of about 20,000 troops in Afghanistan with a mission of counter-terrorism rather than counter-insurgency.
- tighten up on visas issued to individuals from the Gulf States.


Well, there it is!

 Make sure to drop by every Monday for the WoW! Magazine Forum. And enjoy WoW! Magazine 24-7 with some of the best stuff written in the blogosphere. Take from me, you won't want to miss it.

Sunday, October 02, 2016

L'Shana Tova! It's Rosh Hashona!



Celebrating 5,777 Years With The Same Management...


Tonight at sundown, Rosh Hashona, the Jewish New Year kicks in, traditionally a time for reflection and spiritual self-examination, as it starts the Days of Awe that proceed through Yom Kippur, the Jewish Day of Atonement.

Since this year it starts Sunday evening, I will be offline until Tuesday evening.

It's traditional during this holiday to eat apples and honey and sweet things in general, as you see these Jews in Uganda doing:



Pomegranates are also eaten, because the seeds symbolize fertility.

One of the most important traditions of the holiday is the blowing of a ram's horn, the shofar. It is designed to be a trumpet call that galvanizes Jews into a spiritual awakening, in the ten days before Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement.

One of the holiest places to blow the shofar on Rosh Hashona and Yom Kippur is at the Kotel, the Western Wall. And there are still Jews alive who remember when that was a crime.

When the British ruled Israel,they did everything they could to deny the Jews a nation in spite of their pledged word, simple human decency, international law and the terms of the League of Nations mandate that required them to do the groundwork for the creation of a Jewish state.

As part of that, they forbade Jews to sound the shofar or bring Torah scrolls to the Kotel under pain of arrest and imprisonment. And of course, after the Arabs took over the Old City, the Jews who lived there were forcibly expelled,their Holy shrines were desecrated and destroyed and the Kotel was used as a garbage dump.

Here's a wonderful video showing how the Jews dealt with the British and what happened at the Kotel when the Jews retook the Old City from the Arabs after 19 years of exile. It will make you smile:



Anyone who thinks the Jews are willingly going to give up Jerusalem again ought to seek psychiatric care.

My very best wishes for the coming year....may you and yours be inscribed for a sweet and wonderful year.

Shanah tovah u'metukah.

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Shimon Peres, 1923-2016

 Shimon Peres in Brazil (cropped 2).jpg
 (By Elza Fiúza - Agência Brasil (Department of Press and Media).  Courtesy of WikiCommons)

Shimon Peres, one of the original founding fathers of Israel died yesterday at 93 after a massive stroke. For many Israelis, he was the final link between the founders who created the miracle of Israel and the present day.

There's a lot that could be said about Shimon Peres. He was a key aide of Ben-Gurion's and played a major part in wheeling and dealing to get the Haganah arms during Israel's War of Independence in1948, when the world, after recognizing Israel as a state pretty much turned their back on the Jews in the face of Arab jihad less than three years after Auschwitz was liberated. While the Arabs received modern arms and in the case of Jordan, trained officers from Britain to lead to lead the Arabs in their planned annihilation of the Jews of Israel, most nations placed an arms embargo on the nascent Jewish State in the name of 'neutrality' including the United States.

Peres found enough ways around that (with the assistance of a number of sympathetic souls around the globe, some of whose names would surprise you) to get enough arms and ammo into Israel so that with G-d's help Israel survived.

It's never ceased to amuse me that the first major shipment of arms to Israel were Nazi arms manufactured in Czechoslovakia that Peres bought on the black market.

There is plenty more you can read elsewhere about his career. A socialist kibbutznik (he helped found Kibbutz Alumot) he remained a man of the left his entire life. He served time in Israel's government as defense minister, where he was instrumental in establishing close relations with France that led to massive arms deals to help Israel keep its edge over the enemies that surrounded it. The French thought so highly of Peres that they awarded him the Legion D' Honor.

He served as Prime Minister twice, but was never actually elected, leading to one of those wonderfully acerbic Israeli political jokes I needn't mention here. Eventually, he served as Israel's President, a largely ceremonial role that he performed with distinction.

Yes, there are other things that could be said about Shimon Peres that aren't so complimentary, and I think a lot of Israelis know exactly what I'm talking about.

But this isn't the time or place for that, not today. Today, we honor one of Israel's pioneers, a man who helped create a nation for the Jewish People.

Rest in peace Shimon (Z"L). And may your memory be blessed for the good you accomplished.

Congress Overrules Obama Veto On State Sponsored Terrorism Bill

 http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1obama-angry.jpg

The U.S. congress with strong bi-partisan majorities overrode President Obama's veto of a bill that allows the families of American victims of terrorism to sue states that sponsor terrorist attacks. The catalyst behind the legislation was new evidence about Saudi complicity in the 9/11 attacks, and the bill would allow victims of those who were murdered sue the government of Saudi Arabia. Iran is also a likely target.

The vote in the senate was 97-1, and was led by Chuck Schumer(D-NY) who made an impassioned speech urging his fellow Democrats to vote to veto the bill. The one holdout was Harry Reid (D-Nevada)who is retiring from the Senate this year with his ill-gotten gains intact and a reputation of being the worst, most divisive Senate Majority leader in history. Vice presidential candidate Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) chose to skip out on the voting even though he was in town. Given his Muslim Brotherhood ties, I'm not surprised.

In the house, the vote was 348 to 77.

The argument against the bill was that it would allow other countries to retaliate and sue us. At a time when Iran is kidnapping hostages and holding them for ransom, that argument holds little water. And when it comes to the Saudis, Qatar and other nations in the region, they need us a lot more than we need them.

This is the first time President Barack Hussein Obama has ever been overruled.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Trending On WoW! Magazine...

Watcher of Weasels

The Great Debate: Trump Won Rope A Dope Style 

 Sorry, but including you would be too inclusive for our super duper inclusive environment 

 How to Write a Screenplay 

 What they’re saying about Trump and Clinton 

As you watch the debate, remember that culture war matters 

Debate analysis and open thread 

 Lester Holt, the Poster Child for Media Bias

 For Israel, Signing Obama’s New US-Israel Arms Deal Was A Mistake 

 5 Dead In Washington State Mall – Nothing to Do With Islam, Of Course

The Great Debate: Trump Won Rope A Dope Style

 File:Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during United States presidential election 2016.jpg

Ah yes, the debate. It pretty much turned out like I said it would.

I actually live blogged the whole thing (yes, once again I watch this stuff so you don't have too) but this was such a travesty I'll just go over the main points.

The minute Hillary walked out with that manic smile, my comment at 6:06 PM (all times PST) was 'boy, did they shoot her full of drugs.' I'm not kidding in the least. I know a  bit about such things. I'd guess B-12 combined with a Dexedrine cocktail, perhaps with some cortisone shots to keep her knees from buckling for 90 minutes. They'll play hell trying to get her to sleep tonight without the aid of some serious downers like Seconal.

Expect her to be out of action for a few days.

Another thing I noticed (and I wasn't the only one) was how over prepared she was, with each answer spilling on without so much as an um or an err. After the third time this happened, I understood. She'd  gotten the questions in advance from Lester Holt, who composed them, and had then spent serious time rehearsing. It was like watching one of those old 'pull the ring and she talks' dolls.

As for Lester Holt, performed exactly as I said he would. Anyone watching the debates understood instantly that this was Holt and Hillary against the Donald.

Holt had been chest thumping and bragging to his colleagues about how he was going to 'take down Trump.'

His questions were pretty much out of the Clinton playbook worded in leftist prose about 'income inequality' 'climate change' and 'racial justice', with aggressive interrogations by Holt on Trump's tax returns, Trump's 'racist birtherism' Trump's business bankruptcies and other tidbits. I especially liked the one where he framed Clinton's tax plans as 'Mrs. Clinton wants to tax the wealthy, and you want to lower taxes on the wealthy.' Actually Trump's plan is for an across the board tax cut and he did a decent job explaining it once he was able to get past Holt's constant interruptions and snide comments. Actually, Holt interrupted Trump 58% more  than he interrupted Hillary Clinton.

Funny thing, Lester Holt had no questions about Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation or Hillary's e-mail scandal and her illegal private server. Even though one of his questions concerned cyber security, there were no followup questions on that little item! Lester Holt had indeed learned not to go there after what happened to Matt Lauer! The only mention was a comeback by Trump, who said he'd release his taxes when Mrs. Clinton released the 32,000 e-mails she deleted. It got a huge ovation from the audience which Lester Holt shushed as soon as he could. On the other hand,  any applause for Mrs. Clinton was allowed to continue.

The only problem from Hillary's standpoint with Lester Holt's blatant partisan approach is that he overplayed his hand. He was so obvious about the whole thing that he actually helped Trump, who was perceived as the underdog fighting back against as rigged system, which has been one of Trump's campaign  themes. Here was living proof, right in front of everyone. Social media is on fire about this.

Viewer polls from Time Magazine, Drudge and even CNBC showed Trump winning the debate handily and they weren't the only ones. Even Slate showed Trump winning.  Needless to say, as I predicted the legacy media is already trying to spin this as a Clinton win, but it's going to be very difficult:


People might forget what you say, but never how you made them feel. Based on that, Trump won handily. 

Of course, the 'fact checking' will go on. For instance, Trump was also entirely correct when he said murders had increased in 2016 in spite of the in the tank Politifact's efforts to lie about it. Talk about pants on fire!


 Expect a lot more of this. But people simply aren't fooled by the Clinton media as easily as they used to be.

Mrs. Clinton also did herself no favors ranting on about the 'incipient racism' in white society and especially among the police. I guess even when a black cop shoots a black man coming at him with a gun after being told repeatedly to drop his weapon, that's white racism too.

Trump also scored because of his obviously superior knowledge of how business and economics works and with a little exchange he had with Lester Holt about Stop and Frisk. When Holt stated incorrectly that it was 'unconstitutional,'  Trump correctly replied that this was a ruling from one judge who was actually removed from the case and  that New York's cop hating Mayor De Blasio had chosen to quash what would have likely been a successful appeal.

Trump did make one error I need to mention and he's not the only one. Barack Obama might brag about ending the Iraq War and people may talk about the vacuum this created  but both  are dead wrong. George W.Bush was the man who signed the disposition of forces agreement with Iraqi leader al-Maliki which called for all U.S. forces to be withdrawn from the Shi'ite dictatorship Bush created there, one of the stupidest things an American president has ever done. It laid the groundwork for Iran to flourish without the checkmate of Saddam Hussein's army right across the Gulf. But Obama can take no credit of blame for pulling our troops out of Iraq.

Of course Obama and Hillary can definitely be charged with having a major role in creating ISIS (which started in Syria as jihadist elements of the Syrian Free Army Obama funded armed and trained, not in Iraq)  and destabilizing the entire Middle East with his illegal war in Libya, but that's a different question.

Again, this wasn't even a semblance of a debate. In a real debate, one of the participants can say the moon is made of green cheese   and it's not the moderator's job to  'fact check' the speaker but but her opponent's to rebut her. Especially when the 'fact checking' is done in advance and aimed at one candidate and one only.

A final takeaway has to do with the overall demeanor of the candidates. As I predicted both Hillary and her minion Lester Holt tried their best to insult, demean and bait trump hoping to make him lose his cool. He refused to rise to the bait and kept things civil, which surprised a lot of people. He looked  presidential compared to Mrs. Clinton's genuinely smug, nasty demeanor. The only time he really let fly a little is when Mrs. Clinton started bragging about her experience and Trump countered by saying something to the effect that it was all bad experience and failure, which again got an ovation Holt did his best to shush.

I honestly don't think Trump realized the extent the media was prepared to go to to try and take him down. They failed, but the Donald is a quick learner. And yes, Trump made a decision to avoid landing what could have been knockout blows in favor of appearing more likeable and presidential. For instance, when Hillary and Lester Holt were painting him as a sexist, it would have been no trouble at all for him to start referring to Hillary's sexual predator of a husband and Hillary's enabling of it. But as Trump tells it, he saw Chelsea in the audience and decided to let it pass because he felt it wasn't the right thing to do. Like Hillary's corruption and weakness on cyber security, most people already know this anyway, so I think that was a smart decision on his part first time out.

Trump fooled me too on this one. At times, I was like Bundini or Angelo Dundee, yelling 'Champ! Get off the ropes! Don't let them pound you like that, mention the  Clinton Foundation!'

But like Mohammed Ali, The Donald chose to hold some of his fire and let Crooked Hillary and her media shill beat themselves, rope a dope style. Smart move, and expect him to be even more impressive next time out.