Tuesday, July 11, 2006

The nukes of August?

Larijani and Solana...."Get bent, infidels"

Iran continues to play the West for suckers and stall for time with meaningless `negotiations' on the incentives package presented to them by the West.

Ali Larijani, Teheran's top nuclear negotiator has basically continued a stalemate in meetings with EU appeaser-in-chief - uh ,sorry... foreign policy chief Javier Solana that the "ambiguities must be removed first in order to have serious talks."

Whoopsie! There goes another deadline..the west ws under the mistaken impression that Iran would have a definitive answer by July 11th. Guess again, infidels!

Foreign ministers from the six powers that crafted the proposal - the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany - are supposed to meet on the 11th in Paris, and were pushing for an agreement before the July 15-17 Group of Eight summit in St. Petersberg, Russia.

I don't see why they're surprised. Surpreme Leader Ayatollah Khameinei has already said that Iran has rejected the package and will keep working on its nuclear weapons program...and Ahamadinejad said that this would be a "long process" and not to expect an answer of any kind before August 22nd.

Larijani warned the United States and others against sending the matter to the Security Council for possible sanctions, calling it "the wrong way" to solve the impasse.

"It is not difficult to disrupt negotiations by making harsh comments," Larijani said.

The European Union said it was disappointed with Iran's position (awww!)and essentially called the Iranians and Larijani liars when they said there were `ambiguities' that needed to be cleared up and that the EU had failed to clear up questions on the package.

"The meeting was disappointing," Cristina Gallach, spokeswoman for EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, said after his talks with chief Iranian nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani.

"All the questions were answered. If there were no more answers, it was because there were no more questions," she said.

It's pretty obvious to me that the attack on Israel by Iran's proxy Hamas and the turmoil created by the Iran controlled Shia militias in Iraq are designed to buy time and take the spotlight off the mullahs...until they're ready to respond.

Now, why August 22nd? Islam uses a lunar calendar, so the dates change every year. Charles Johnson at lgf mentioned that in the Islamic calender, August 22 works out to Rajab 28, the day Saladin conquered and entered Jerusalem. That got me wondering, so I did a bit more research. More to the point Rajab 28 is also the date the Imam Husayn (who started Shia Islam and who is revered as the precurser of the Hidden 12th Imam) started his journey to Karbala from Medina. And on the eve 27th of Rajab (August 21st)Mohammed allegedly ascended to heaven in the famous `night journey' from Jerusalem, which Muslims commemorate as the Lailatul Mi'raj.

Could the Mullahs be planning an attack on Israel or the US to celebrate? It's a reach, but considering the mentality of these people, not all that far.


Anonymous said...

while you connect the dots, i'll check whether iranian embassies around the globe are hiring slow typists.

Freedom Fighter said...

LOL!! BTW, did you get what I sent you?

W. said...

Thanks. This is one of those things that might have meaning or just might be coincidence or even might be a way for them to strike some temporary fear in Westerners who think too logically about these things. For those who following profiling methods and what not.

Anyway, time will tell. If something does happen, there will probably be those who criticize a lack of prep for this; and if prep were done that involved public measures then those same folks would probably be critical because "rights are being violated" or this is just more discrimination against Muslims.

Can't win with them.

Go Israel.

W. said...

By the way, forgot to say, like the blog. Will link to it.

Anonymous said...

I have reasoned and believe that Iran will conduct a limited test of a nuclear devise on or around the 22 of August

Jesse Califano

Margaret said...

Hi! Found your blog via Google. I've had a bad dream regarding August 22nd and it seems I'm not the only one. Just connecting the dots - and at this point I don't believe you are far off.


Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor Doctrine (DNA Doctrine)
http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur/; http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/
Kalki Gaur: American Nuclear Weapon Doctrine © 2006 Copyrights
(1) QUERY: President of Iran has publicly threatened to use nuclear weapons to wipe Israel out of the map of the world. The Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) Doctrine stabilized USA-Russia relations, but MAD doctrines failed in case of irrational Islamic nuclear powers. President Pervez Musharraf warned India at the General Assembly sppech that Pakistan would use nuclear missiles if India even stepped inside frontier lines of Pakistan. How India or Israel should develop a nuclear doctrine to deter the threat of nuclear attacks from Pakistan and Iran as fundamentalist Jihadi Muslims are not rational human beings to be deterred by Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) Nuclear doctrine? How Israel or India should develop a nuclear doctrine to deter Iranian or Islamic nuclear attacks as MAD doctrine fails to deter the Jihadis and Martyrdom seeking Islamic terrorist leadership of the Middle East? How USA could deter oil-rich Saudi Al Qaeda fundamentalists from using dirty radioactive nuclear bomb to contaminate the civilized metropolitan cities by terrorist dirty nuke attacks as a replay of 9/11 attacks in future? Would Israelis face second Holocaust at hands of nuclear Mullahs of Iran?
SOLUTION: (DNA Nuclear Doctrine): The Nuclear Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor, warns the Islamic nations that any attack on any civilized nation (“Y”) by Islamic nuclear power (“X”) would result in the mass execution of the entire male population of that nuclear aggressor (“X”) and all women, lands and assets of the Islamic nuclear aggressor (“X”) shall become the property of the nuclear victim (“Y”). Nuke seeking Mullahs of Iran should be given a clear warning that in the event of any nuclear attack by Iran on Israel, the entire male population of Iran shall meet its fate determined by the Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressior (DNA) Nuclear Doctrine.
SCENARIO: If Chechnyya Muslims detonated radioactive Bomb in Moscow and If Iranian Army fired nuclear missile on Tel Aviv, what should be the response of great powers? If Arabian Al Qaeda detonated radio active Bomb in New York? What should be the response of the civilized world to punish the perpetrator of the war cime? The Male Depopulation of the nation that launched or financed the nuclear attack would deter the nuclear event.
D.N.A. NUCLEAR DETERRENT: The doctrinal threat to depopulate the entire male population of Iran as a consequence of Iranian nuclear attack on Israel would deter any nuclear attack by Iran whatsoever. The Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor (D.N.A.) Nuclear Doctrine is more humane than the Mutual Assured Destruction (M.A.D.) Nuclear Doctrine for Nuclear Deterrence.

President Bush should directly invade Iran to keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. President Bush should work with President Pervez Musharraf to identify and immobilize all Pakistani nuclear scientists that are currently hiding in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, UAE or Libya. President Bush correctly declared that United States would never allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. Iran is misusing its oil income to attempt a faith-based geopolitical domination of the oil-producing Arabian Gulf by radicalizing the Shia populations of the Middle East. United States should declare the support to the Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor (DNA) Nuclear Doctrine to convince Iranian people that acquisition of nuke technology could result in the male depopultion of Iran in the even nuke-mad Mullahs ever misused the nukes against Israel. Iran and Saudi Arabia are waging a War of Civilizations against the West and the East. The total population of the Arab Middle East is less than 100 million and they cannot be allowed to hold the 6 billion people of the plant earth to ransom. The Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor (DNA) nuclear doctrine is more humane and more rational than the Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) Doctrine. United States, India and Israel should officially incorporate DNA Nuclear doctrine as part of the official nuclear doctrine.
DNA Doctrine. Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor has an acronym DNA Doctrine. This doctrine promotes nuclear peace by postulating that any First Use of Nuclear Weapons would result in the total occupation of the Aggressor Nation and the mandatory execution of its entire male population.
Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear aggressor states, if Nuclear attacker “X” undertakes a preemptive nuclear strike on Country “Y” then country “Y” shall have the legal rights under International Law to invade Country “X” and execute the entire male population of nuclear attacker country “X” and take over all the women, lands and assets of the country “X”.
Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor states as follows. Whenever a Nuclear Weapon Nation launches preemptive nuclear strikes against other Nation B, then the Victim Nation B will militarily retaliate to defeat the Nuclear Aggressor Nation A. The Nuclear Victim Nation B, will then execute the entire adult male population of the Nation A. In doing so the Nation B will not be violating any current Laws of War. The Nuclear Victim Nation B could also take over all the women, lands and assets of that Aggressor Nation A, without violating the Laws of War. If any Nuclear Power (A) attacks Nation (B), whether a nuclear or non-nuclear power, then once the hostilities are over, the world organization and world powers would arrange that the entire male population of the Nuclear Aggressor Nation A would be hanged and executed. The entire lands and resources of the Nuclear Aggressor Nation (A) would become the property of the Nuclear Victim Nation (B). The enforcing World Organizations would recoup their total cost of enforcing the DNA Doctrine, out of the national resources of the Aggressor Nation (A).

The United Nations should pass a treaty declaring that any first use of Nuclear weapons would be a Crime against Humanity and a War Crime. The United Nations should declare that it would supervise the mandatory execution of the entire male population of any Nuclear Aggressor Nation that used nuclear weapons in the preemptive nuclear strike against other Nation.

Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor, DNA Doctrine is more humane and results in more effective nuclear deterrent, than the Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction, M.A.D. Doctrine. The M.A.D. doctrine is more destructive as it leads to a nuclear Armageddon. The Victim Nuclear Power would destroy the whole planet in case of preemptive nuclear attack and the resulting Second retaliatory strikes.
Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction is credible as a nuclear Deterrent and promotes world peace. M.A.D. Doctrine threatens the potential Nuclear Aggressor that the Nuclear Victim of the preemptive nuclear attack would launch the retaliatory strikes against the Aggressor Nation annihilating it. Sufficient nuclear weapons of the Victim Nation would survive the preemptive strikes, enabling the Victim Nuclear Power to launch the retaliatory strike against the Aggressor Nation, annihilating the Aggressor.

Leaders of the fanatic and terrorist Nations are not reasonable and logical. The fanatic Muslim Mojahideen believing in the ideal of Religious War Jihad and could sacrifice their own lives and even their lands, driven by their fury to convert Kefirs. MAD Doctrine will not deter fanatic Terrorist Islamic Nuclear Powers from launching the preemptive nuclear strikes against non-Muslim nations. Thus, the Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) would fail to provide an effective Deterrent against a fanatic Islamic Nuclear States. Since Islam preaches fanaticism, so even a normal nation like Pakistan under the influence of religious frenzy could become irrational enough to launch preemptive nuclear strikes against Muslim States like Israel and India disregarding the consequences of the Retaliation.

India and Israel should jointly develop a credible Doctrine of Nuclear Deterrent against Islamic Nuclear Weapon Powers. India and Israel should promote the Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor. We should amend the Laws of War to include the provision of the mass execution of the entire male population of the nuclear aggressors. The problem is how to prevent any future Pakistani and other MAD Muslim leader from making preemptive nuclear strikes. How to stop Pakistan and other Muslim nuclear weapon powers from using nuclear weapons against India and Israel? When the Muslim nuclear nations realize that it could lose its entire male population, if it ever launches a nuclear strike against India, then it would never launch the nuclear weapons.

Mad Muslim terrorists and fanatic Islamic nations could easily buy nuclear components to assemble a nuclear arsenal. Maniacs are irrational and not deterred by any future threat of Second Strike by the victim. Since any Second Strike retaliation would also destroy a large part of the world, the mad leaders argue that the Victim State would lack the Will for launching the retaliatory second nuclear strikes, as it could destroy the World. Because the M.A.D. Doctrine envisages a gruesome holocaust, so mad Nuclear States could launch an unprovoked nuclear attack. Mad nuclear State could argue that because the retaliatory Second Strike Capabilities results into a holocaust, the Victim of the nuclear attack would refrain from pushing the Nuclear Button. Thus logic of an Armageddon promoted by Mutual Assured Destruction Doctrine would become counter productive and fail to deter a nuclear attack by Pakistan and other Mad fanatic terrorist Nuclear Muslim Regimes. India and United States should work to remove Pakistani nuclear scientists that have disappeared in Saudi Arabia, Libya and Malaysia. Pakistan must account for all missining nuclear scientists of Pakistan.

A mad leader of the Islamic Nuclear nation would argue that the sensible non-Muslim leaders would not respond with counter nuclear attacks, as it would destroy a large part of the world. While Armageddon being the only credible nuclear option, it would fail to deter the mad, fanatic, terrorist nuclear nations. The Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction would fail to provide nuclear deterrent, against Pakistani nuclear weapons. Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction would fail to deter Pakistani Islamic Nuclear weapon powers from launching preemptive nuclear strikes.

Pakistan could drop Atom Bombs on Israel or India, either incited by Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or blinded by Jihad spirit to convert Hindus into Islam. Desert Arabs could use nuclear weapons against agricultural societies, arguing that Arabs would survive the nuclear war in desert oases. Arabs attacked Iran, destroyed Zoroastrian Civilization, and forcibly converted Iranian Zoroastrians into Islam. Semite Arab had been a slave in the ancient Egypt Civilization of Brown Pharaohs. Semite Jews and Arab Muslims attacked Egypt to massacre the entire dominant Brown Race of the ancient Egypt. Fair skinned Semite Arab Muslims occupied Egypt and North Africa. Throughout history, whenever Muslims had military superiority they destroyed non-Muslim societies. Before the Islamic conquest Libya and Algeria was the granary of the Roman Empire. Conquest by the nomadic Arabs destroyed the agricultural economy.

The problem as How to deter any future mad Muslim Nuclear Power from using nuclear weapons against Christians, Jews or Hindus, who could be under the influence of the religious Jihad spirit! As explained above, the Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction would fail to provide credible nuclear deterrent.

What could be the Solution? Even the most rabid fanatic, terrorist leader of a Muslim nuclear weapon State, would be deterred from using nuclear weapons against any other adversary, if it knew that the retaliation would be according to DNA Doctrine. Muslim Nations should unequivocally understand the following. The result of any Muslim nuclear attack on India, will be the mandatory execution of the entire Muslim male population of that Muslim nation. Besides it will also result in the confiscation of the entire Muslim Women, Lands and Resources by India. Then no Muslim nation would dare undertake a nuclear strike against India.

Only the Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor Doctrine would deter nuclear attack from a fanatic Islamic terrorist nuclear nation. DNA Doctrine would convince the Islamic World that the result of any Islamic nuclear preemptive attack would be the mandatory execution of entire Islamic male population. Besides all of its Women, Lands and Resources, would become the property of the nuclear Victim Nation.

What should be the response if any small or Micro Islamic State with small population, decide to commit suicide in the name of Islam, launches the nuclear weapons against a very populous Nation? What should be the response, if the Organization of Islamic States, (OIC) or OPEC finances an Islamic State to develop nuclear weapons and use against other non-Islamic State say Israel, Vatican or Mediterranean Europe? Whether the Victim State or its allies could punish only the front nation, who physically dropped the Bomb or the retaliation could be against all conspiring Islamic allies? Should the retaliations be limited to the Proxy enemy the Front Nation, Mini State whose leadership they have bribed to drop the Atom Bomb, or could it be against the entire coalition? Any Arab state that finances Pakistani Nuclear Weapon Program will be considered a joint-aggressor, in case of Pakistani nuclear attack against India. India could retaliate at nuclear level against that particular Arab State.

In Common Law if Organized Crime issues a contract to make the hit, the entire crime organization is considered guilty of crime and is punished. Indian Nuclear Doctrine should unequivocally declare that any nuclear attack by any Islamic State would result in massive nuclear retaliation against the entire hostile Islamic Coalition, specially such Islamic Nations as aided, abetted and financed the Aggressor.

What should be the retaliation in case Islamic nations conspire to sacrifice one Islamic State to wage a nuclear attack on Hinduism and Judaism? What would the retaliation if the Micro State of Palestine (PLO) led by a terrorist, were to drop nuclear bombs on Europe, America, Israel or India, aided and funded by other richer Islamic States? Should the retaliation be limited to PLO? Islamic Nations could select a smaller State having a smaller population, to launch a nuclear attack on a nation of 900 million by proxy. They may argue that even if the nation-state with the population of only five millions, gets destroyed by the retaliatory strikes, it should be considered an acceptable loss, as it helps eliminate an enemy state. What should India’s response be?

Indian Nuclear doctrine unequivocally declares that India will not restrict the populous nation’s retaliatory strikes to the smaller Nation that acted as the front in this Proxy War. Indian will retaliate by using neutron bombs, against all members of the enemy coalition attacked.

No Islamic nation has large populations, while Hinduism and Judaism are one-country Religions. The populous nation justifies the retaliatory nuclear strikes against the entire coalition of hostile nations, whose total population equals to that of the populous nation. Indian Nuclear Doctrine should declare that if Islam were to declare a Religious War on Hindu India, a nation of 950 millions, then Indian retaliation would target the entire Islamic Bloc having combined population of 900 millions. If Islamic World incites Pakistan to launch nuclear strikes against India, then India would make targets retaliatory nuclear strikes against all Islamic States.

Indian Nuclear Doctrine will declare that the populous Victim of a preemptive nuclear strike has a legal right of counter-strikes against the entire Coalition of hostile Nations. It can retaliate against all conspiring nations, whose combined populations equal the populous Victim.
Doctrine of Depopulation of Nuclear Aggressor unequivocally declares as follows. In case of any Islamic Nuclear strike by any Islamic Nation, against any non-Islamic Nation, the retaliation would target the entire Islamic World. The right of nuclear retaliation would justify India to use nuclear weapons against the Islamic World.

Author: Kalki Gaur: American Nuclear Weapon Doctrine © 2006 Copyrights
http://my.opera.com/kalkigaur/blog/ http://my.opera.com/kalkitv/blog/
http://indiatalking.com/kalkigaur/ http://360.yahoo.com/diplomacyofcivilizations/