Sunday, June 20, 2010

Honeywell: Enabling Iran's Quest for Nuclear Weapons

http://smallembellishments.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/thumbsdown.jpg

There's an interesting demonstration planned tomorrow, June 21st at a corporate headquarters in New Jersey by a wide variety of groups, including StandWithUs, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), No Nukes for Iran and a number of other groups between 1:00 and 2:00 PM.

The target? The Honeywell corporate headquarters located at 101 Columbia Road in Morristown.

What Honeywell done to excite all this well-deserved wrath is reminiscent of those companies that continued to trade with Hitler even after his violent and genocidal aims became clear.

Honeywell, you see, does a great deal of business in Iran, especially with its energy sector. A Honeywell subsidiary, Universal Oil Products is currently expanding and upgrading Iran's Arak refinery, helping the regime to overcome one of its primary strategic weaknesses.

Another interesting facility located in the Arak complex is Iran's heavy water plant, a facility that has no peaceful application and is only useful in helping to formulate nuclear weapons.

Honeywell has consistently refused to address this, very interesting considering that Honeywell is involved in more US government contracts than any other company currently doing business in Iran and the bi-partisan support in Congress for increased sanctions aimed at Iran's oil and natural gas industry.

Not to mention simple decency.

If you can't be at the demonstration, you can send a message to Honeywell here

I also recommend that you contact your representative in Congress and call for a total investigation of the government contracts Honeywell is currently involved in, with an aim of terminating them or switching them to other vendors to the degree this is possible.

Certainly they shouldn't be the recipient of any more government business.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Mark Steyn's Latest: 'The Epitome of Mediocrity'


Leave it to Mark Steyn to phrase it just right:

I believe it was Jean Giraudoux who first said, "Only the mediocre are always at their best." Barack Obama was supposed to be the best, the very best, and yet he is always, reliably, consistently mediocre. His speech on oil was no better or worse than his speech on race. Yet the Obammyboppers who once squealed with delight are weary of last year's boy band. At the end of the big Oval Office address, Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews and the rest of the MSNBC gang jeered the president. For a bewildered President Obama, it must have felt like his Ceausescu balcony moment. Had they caught up with him in the White House parking lot, they would have put him up against the wall and clubbed him to a pulp with Mr. Matthews' no-longer-tingling leg.

For the first time, I felt a wee bit sorry for the poor fellow. What had he done to so enrage his full supporting chorus? In The Washington Post, the reaction of longtime Obammysoxer Eugene Robinson was headlined "Obama disappoints from the beginning of his speech."

So what? He always "disappoints." What would have been startling would have been if he hadn't "disappointed." His eve-of-election rally for Martha Coakley "disappointed" the Massachusetts electorate so much it gave Ted Kennedy's seat to a Republican. His speech for Chicago's Olympic bid "disappointed" the Oslo committee so much it gave the games to Pyongyang, or Ougadougou, or any city offering to build a stadium with electrical outlets incompatible with Mr. Obama's teleprompter. Be honest, guys, his inaugural address "disappointed," too, didn't it? Oh, in those days, you still did your best to make the case for it. "He carries us from meditative bead to meditative bead, and invites us to contemplate," wrote Stanley Fish in the New York Times. "There is a technical term for this kind of writing - parataxis, defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as 'the placing of propositions or clauses one after the other without indicating ... the relation of co-ordination or subordination between them.'"

Gotcha. To a fool, His Majesty's new clothes appear invisible. But, to a wise man, the placing of buttons and pockets without indicating the relation of co-ordination is a fascinating exercise in parataxical couture.


Read the rest here....strong stuff.


(hat tip, Soccer Dad



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Democrats Earmark $50M To Lure Young And Minority Voters To The Polls

There's a very revealing story in today's WAPO about the Democrats new get out the vote efforts for the midterms:

As political gambles go, it's a big and risky one: $50 million to test the proposition that the Democratic Party's outreach to new voters that helped make Barack Obama president can work in an election where his name is not on the ballot.

The standard rule of midterm elections is that only the most reliable voters show up at the polls, so both parties have traditionally focused on the unglamorous and conventional work that turns out their bases. But this year, the Democrats are doubling down on registering and motivating newer voters -- especially the 15 million heavily minority and young, who made it to the polls for the first time in the last presidential election.

"It's a great experiment to see whether we can bring out voters whose only previous vote was in 2008," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

The party's overall budget for reaching new voters is more than twice as big as the $17 million it spent during the tumultuous 2006 midterm, which returned control of both houses of Congress to the Democrats. {...}

"When that announcement was made, it just wasn't taken very credibly," says Republican National Committee spokesman Doug Heye. "Those voters just aren't going to be there this time."

He's not alone in thinking that.

Some veteran Democratic Party operatives are also skeptical that the $50 million investment will pay off -- except, perhaps, in keeping the grassroots operation alive for Obama's reelection bid two years from now. Some even suggest that the president's team has put his long-term interests ahead of his party's immediate struggle for survival.

"I have zero confidence that they're heading in the right direction here," says one longtime Democratic organizer who didn't want to be quoted by name criticizing his party's major midterm election initiative. Added another: "I think they're going to come in for a very rude awakening. It's going to be brutal."

If that turns out to be the case, the doubters say, Democrats will wake up the morning of Nov. 3 wishing they had spent that $50 million on more traditional methods, like television ads, for reaching their base and persuading independents.


Let's translate this into non-PC terms.

The Democrat hierarchy is admitting here that they have lost the majority of White, senior, middle class and independent voters beyond all redemption. So they are spending their money - lots of it - to try and turn out inexperienced and usually credible college students, Black America ( where Obama still polls decently for reasons I'll allow you to fill in for yourselves) and the pro amnesty constituency.In other words, people who form a disproportionate percentage of non-taxpayers.

That, along with Obama's far left base and Big Labor has become the new Democrat constituency. They've lost almost everything else.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Exposed -The Real Story On The 'Peace Activists' behind The Hezbollah Flotilla



Keep this in mind, especially if the Israelis need to use forceful means to stop them.

I would guess that the 'goods' carried on these ships will be similar to the first flotilla - poorly packed foods ( even though no one is Gaza is starving), expired medicines and a few medical items in poor repair.The idea here is propaganda, after all.

Subsequent shipments will be the ones containing Iranian missiles and weaponry.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Leftist PR Firm Flacks For Jihad - And There's A J-Street Connection

http://hashmonean.com/images/cf_sweetn.gif

Fenton Communications, a far Left PR and communications firm with offices in D.C., New York, and San Francisco whose biggest project to date was taking Geore Soros' MoveOn.Org and turning it into a national brand name and political force has a brand new project.

They've signed contracts with the government of Qatar to create an international campaign with the object of delegitimizing Israel and generating 'activist' support for Hamas, with special attention paid to university campuses.

The campaign is known as the “Al Fakhoora Project.”

Fenton’s Al Fakhoora project is cleverly disguised as a campaign to help students in Gaza in the pursuit of a better education.

One of the documents filed with the Department of Justice describes Al Fakhoora as a “student-led campaign to protect education from violence during war or conflicts, specifically in Gaza, and to lead an international public opinion awareness campaign that advocates for the accountability of those who participated in attacks on schools in Gaza.”

Al Fakhoora Director Farooq Burney explains in a YouTube video about the Gaza flotilla attack that “the purpose of us to join this trip was number one, to allow support, or to enable us to interact with students in Gaza. Our intention was to go there and lend our support to students in Gaza and let them know that people care for them, and people are advocating for them to have access to quality education.”

"Unfortunately,” Burney went on, “we were attacked by the Israeli navy. People were killed. People were injured. It was very saddening to see that, to have somebody die in front of you . . . We talk about humanitarian work, we talk about activism. I don’t know how much more peaceful this could have been.”


I think enough of you have seen the videos by now to see exactly how 'peaceful' the jihadists were on the Mamera.

Now Fenton Communications rings a bell...because the anti-Israel group J-Street's director Jeremy Ben-Ami just happened to have been Fenton Communications’ senior vice president right up until he 'launched' J-Street with George Soros' money.

Tell me - do you think J Street’s refusal to support Israel’s Operation Cast Lead to stop the missiles coming at them from Hamas had anything to do with his prior ties to Fenton? And that's assuming he has no present ties or financial interest in the company.

And what about J-Street's financial support via its PAC for a number of Lefty Democrat Congressmen who signed a letter supporting Hamas, including Israel haters like Keith Ellison, John Conyers, Jim Moran, Mike Honda, Barbara Lee,and Jim McDermott - not to mention J-Street officially endorsing the letter? Were Ben-Ami's ties to Fenton behind that?

Somehow I doubt it's a coincidence. Although it does point out, as if it needed pointing out at this late date that Anti-Semitism definitely has a home in a least a decent sized part of the 'progressive' Left.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Saturday, June 19, 2010

The Full LATMA Update, Including The Three Terrors And Other Skits



Wicked Israeli political satire at it's best. I especially like the Prince Chuckie bit and the comment right after the Three Terrors bit featuring Obama...

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Friday, June 18, 2010

LATMA's Latest Video: 'The Three Terrors'



Iran's Ahmadinejad, Turkey's Tayyip Erdogan and Syria's Basher Assad...all on one stage ( unfortunately, not for the first time).

From the same folks who brought you the Gaza Flotilla choir singing 'We Con The World.'

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Watcher's Council Results, Father's Day Edition



The Council has spoken! Here are the results of our weekly Watcher's Council contest.

This week we had ties in both the Council and non-council categories, which means the Watcher casts 1 vote and does the tie breaking, as per our arcane bylaws.

In the tie breaking process, my piece The EU’s Bizarro world view of Gaza lost out for the top spot, but if I had to lose to anyone, I'm sure glad the winner was Omri at Mere Rhetoric's excellent expose of morally bankrupt media, NYT: “Angry Israeli Commandos” Turned “Ship Of Protesters Into Bloodbath”.

In the Non-Council category, the tie breaking vote went to the Elder of Ziyon - for Gaza: The “Staggering quality of the very ordinary” an expose' of exactly how dire a 'humanitarian crisis' Gaza is.

Here are the full results:

Council Winners

Non Council Submissions

As always, congratulations to all the participants as well as the winners.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Victor Davis Hanson: The Great Anglo-American Spat


In today's NRO, Victor Davis Hanson has a great piece examines the rift that has opened up between the US and Britain since Obama took over the White House:

Various irate British observers — from columnists like Peter Hitchens and Geoffrey Wheatcroft to parliamentarians and former cabinet officials — have recently declared the “special relationship” with America to be over. The Anglo animus, perhaps brought to a boil by the World Cup soccer match and by President Obama’s handling of the BP spill, has now reached comical levels. Everything from the War of 1812 to American neutrality in 1939 is evoked to prove that the present estrangement is more typical than aberrant in our post-1776 relations.

To be fair, the miffed British are reacting to two years of both perceived and real slights from the Obama administration. Who does not know the familiar litany? There was the rude return of the magnificent Churchill bust. The asymmetrical gift exchange with Gordon Brown — at the end of a visit in which the president repeatedly snubbed the prime minister — and the banal choice of gift for the queen the following month revealed a certain symbolic spite on the administration’s part.

The State Department’s suggestion that there was nothing particularly special about American-British relations did not help, especially given the feeling that America does not fully appreciate the singular British military contribution in Afghanistan — to be seen in the light of the meager European commitment.

Then there was Secretary Clinton’s unnecessary preemptory announcement of American neutrality in the next round of disputes over the Falklands. All this is topped off by the constant presidential trashing of “British Petroleum” and its mess in the Gulf, with the implication that a foreign interest perhaps does not care too much for a former colony’s ecology.

In reaction, polls reveal that a vast majority of British citizens believe that their relationship with America has worsened since 2009. Of course, we now show the same indifference to almost all our allies, such as the Colombians, Poles, and Israelis. Yet two ancillary considerations perhaps explain why the British are especially upset at these real and hyped slights.

One is embarrassment, and the second a sort of fear.

First, in 2008 the British public heavily invested in candidate Obama as a long-awaited social-democratic anti-Bush. Four years earlier, in 2004, the British media had closely followed the American presidential election, with some commentators haughtily berating the voters of Ohio for giving Bush the margin of victory — as if one swing state that went conservative was responsible for ensuring a continuance of global discord. In this regard, the boorish and untrue slur against George Bush’s supposed lack of interest in reading, offered earlier this month by the new court jester, Paul McCartney, as a sort of toady tip to a smiling Obama, is par for the course rather than a clumsy divot.


Hanson alludes to Obama's Kenyan forebearers ( although he doesn't mention their connection to the Mau-Mau atrocities) and in my view, that's certainly part of it. So is Obama's orientation and education, which as Hanson tells us, is inherently anti-Western.

But the real reason deep down is that to acknowledge the Anglo-American roots of our institutions and our democracy would be to de facto endorse American exceptionalism, a concept Prez Zero reacts to like a vampire to garlic.That, by the way, is one of the reasons Obama has also distanced us from Israel, the symbolic pillar of America's Judeo-Christian roots.

Obama of course is not about to change, so we will have to wait until he's out of office to try to repair our relationships with our allies.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Obama Hits A New Low In The Polls

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4BvRZvYJSy2hYbHcRehVxkIK8bZML8MaMm5FMUAPUNYCq7PL9vY7yA_DSn1YNlKG8k7fYbTySqEPz8LcHp7VOCudtWwFZg6rjzWfUYHdLA2bBhnNH3va27BRZKpk7KIJVV1M2/s400/BarackObama-Crybaby.gif

The latest from Rasmussen, historically the most accurate - 41% approval.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Obama's New $7 Per Gallon Gas Solution

http://www.jankytshirts.com/images/uploads/OWNED_GAS%20PUMP.gif

Ben Lieberman, senior analyst of energy and environmental policy for The Heritage Foundation has an interesting piece in the New York Post that outlines the real cost of the 8 minute 'cap n' tax' part of President Obama's recent speech:

President Obama has a solution to the Gulf oil spill: $7-a-gallon gas.

That's a Harvard University study's estimate of the per-gallon price of the president's global-warming agenda. And Obama made clear this week that this agenda is a part of his plan for addressing the Gulf mess.

So what does global-warming legislation have to do with the oil spill?

Good question, because such measures wouldn't do a thing to clean up the oil or fix the problems that led to the leak.

The answer can be found in Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's now-famous words, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste -- and what I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before."

That sure was true of global-warming policy, and especially the cap-and-trade bill. Many observers thought the measure, introduced last year in the House by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.), was dead: The American people didn't seem to think that the so-called global-warming crisis justified a price-hiking, job-killing, economy-crushing redesign of our energy supply amid a fragile recovery. Passing another major piece of legislation, one every bit as unpopular as ObamaCare, appeared unlikely in an election year.

So Obama and congressional proponents of cap-and-trade spent several months rebranding it -- downplaying the global-warming rationale and claiming that it was really a jobs bill (the so-called green jobs were supposed to spring from the new clean-energy economy) and an energy-independence bill (that will somehow stick it to OPEC). {...}

But the new marketing strategy wasn't working. Few believe the green-jobs hype -- with good reason. In Spain, for example, green jobs have been an expensive bust, with each position created requiring, on average, $774,000 in government subsidies. And the logic of getting us off oil imports via a unilateral measure that punishes American coal, oil and natural gas never made any sense at all.

Now the president is repackaging cap-and-trade -- again -- as a long-term solution to the oil spill. But it's the same old agenda, a huge energy tax that will raise the cost of gasoline and electricity high enough so that we're forced to use less.

The logic linking cap-and-trade to the spill in the Gulf should frighten anyone who owns a car or truck. Such measures force up the price at the pump -- Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs thinks it "may require gas prices greater than $7 a gallon by 2020" to meet Obama's stated goal of reducing emissions 14 percent from the transportation sector.


Read the rest here

I explained in my original critique of the president's speech that his remarks about us 'running out of places to drill' and 'green energy' were either outright lies, a product of gross misinformation or simply a combination of the two.

What is true is that if you look behind the curtain, there are a lot of high level Obama supporters who either already are or look to be making millions in government dollars for pushing things like biomass or wind energy.

Which brings me to another question; the highly secret 20 minute meeting between BP executives,Obama and the Attorney General that resulted in BP setting aside a mere $20 billion in an escrow account 'controlled by a third party', supposedly to ensure that claims are paid for damages caused by the Gulf Spill.

That makes me wonder...who came up with the idea of an escrow account? Obviously not BP, since the press is reporting that it was Obama that got them to agree to it.

Who is going to control the escrow, and what connections do they have to the Obama Administration?

What kind of carrot and stick arguments were used to get BP to agree? What threats if any were used if BP didn't agree - with the Attorney General present in the room? Were any promises made on what might happen if BP did agree to the escrow?

Were there any secret agreements? Did BP agree to kick in for campaign funds for any future green energy legislation? In any way? Will any of the escrow funds be used for that? And who suggested that this entire transaction and the meeting itself were going to be top secret and off the record?

In case some of you think that these are all wild conspiracy theories, you might want to remember that we've been down this same road with Obama before, during the ObamaCare fracas.

Given that Obama already pulled this sort of corrupt backroom deal once, it's not a big stretch to speculate that he's doing it again to help shove through another part of his agenda.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Bob Ethridge - Master Of Cong-Fu!!!

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4011/4704897252_98f7f4fffc_b.jpg

IowaHawk strikes again!

It's the middle of the day on a deserted Washington street. You're on your way to a reelection fund raising brunch. Suddenly a gang of crazed camera-wielding teabaggers jump out from the alley and lunge at you with their razor-sharp switchblade questions!

Would YOU know WHAT TO DO?

Don't let panic and confusion put your poll numbers in the hospital - or worse! Fight back with CONG-FU, the exclusive congressional seat-defense system developed by Sensei Bob Etheridge, world renowned Dragon-level 8 term master of Hu-Yu Drunken Tarheel Style! And now you can learn the forbidden fighting secrets of East Carolina in Sensei Bob's new book, "CONG-FU: The Death Touch."

Other campaign methods focus on evasive action like fleeing town halls and throwing cash at problem constituents. But CONG-FU is the only system that attacks the problem at the source -- your opponents' windpipes! End those reelection fears and gain self confidence. With CONG-FU, you'll turn the tables on angry critics by making them flee from you. Order "CONG-FU: The Death Touch" today and by November your constituents will be afraid to pull the lever for anybody else!

For only $19.95, you'll learn the 17 deadly katas of the CONG-FU fighting discipline -- including Hu-Yu, Flip Slap, Ah-Sol palm thrust, wrist grab rabid monkey style, and Nu-Gi -- along with step-by-step illustrations of Sensei Bob rendering attackers speechless. In this exclusive internet offer, we'll also include a free action-packed DVD!




But CONG-FU is more than aggressive disabling attack techniques. Much more! You'll also learn secret defensive countermoves that will let you maintain complete stealth and plausible deniability, while avoiding arrest -- like the Twisting Weasel modified half-apology, and the deadly meme-killing Yu Tu-Be takedown notice. There's even a complete section on concealed media weapons, including tools like Media-Ite, Wa-Po and Dik-Suk.

But don't take our word for it... listen to these testimonials from satisfied customers:

"Before CONG-FU the Tea Partiers had me cowering in fear. Thanks to Sensei Bob, the next time one of those violent bastards demands I explain a health care vote, he's getting filibustered... right in the wingnuts!"
H.R., Capitol Hill

"The amazing CONG-FU system is the ultimate in stealth. Every eye-gouge and chokehold looks like a friendly hug! At least that's what I'm reporting."
D.W., 15th Street

"I just received my copy of CONG-FU in the mail. Wow! I can't wait to start figuring out whose ass to kick!"
B.O., Pennsylvania Avenue



Read the rest here. IowaHawk, deadly master of the killah wit!

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Aristades De Souza Mendes - Tribute To A Hero



I'd rather be with God against man than with man against God.."
- Aristades De Sousa Mendes


The miracle of courage is an amazing thing when it happens on the battlefield..but some times it is even more pronounced when it amounts to doing the right thing when doing the right thing is difficult and costly and simply following the herd is easy.

Arisitades De Sousa Mendes was the Portuguese consul general in Bordeaux, France, when the Nazis invaded in June, 1940.By then, few people had any illusions left about Hitler's plans for the Jews unless they simply preferred not to know.

Thousands of refugees fled to the south of France in the wake of the Nazi invasion, desperate for a haven. For most of them, particularly Jews, the only possible escape was to make it to the Portuguese port of Lisbon or one of the Spanish ports, which meant getting a Portuguese transit visa to leave France and enter Spain.

De Sousa Mendes was specifically instructed by his government not to issue any transit visas, especially to Jews, since the Portuguese Fascist leader Salazar was wary of going against Hitler. Instead, De Sousa Mendes defied his own government's instructions and he and a handful of his staff worked around the clock to issue visas to an estimated 10,000 Jews and 20,000 other people fleeing the Nazis.

The following is from Yad Vashem's website:

Rabbi Haim Kruger, one of the refugees, told Mendes: “If we should be trapped here, I don’t know what will happen to us.” The rabbi rejected Mendes’ initial offer to issue visas only to the rabbi and his family, insisting that visas also be issued to the thousands of Jews stranded on the streets of the city. After further reflection, Mendes reversed himself and decided to grant visas to all persons requesting it. “I sat with him a full day without food and sleep and helped him stamp thousands of passports with Portuguese visas,” Rabbi Kruger relates. To his staff, Mendes explained: “My government has denied all applications for visas to any refugees. But I cannot allow these people to die. Many are Jews and our constitution says that the religion, or politics, of a foreigner shall not be used to deny him refuge in Portugal. I have decided to follow this principle. I am going to issue a visa to anyone who asks for it – regardless of whether or not he can pay... Even if I am dismissed, I can only act as a Christian, as my conscience tells me.”

It was an unseemly sight as people of all ages, including pregnant women and sick persons, waited in line to have their passports stamped with the Portuguese visa. The reaction of the Portuguese government was not long in waiting. Two emissaries were dispatched to accompany home the insubordinate diplomat. On their way to the Spanish border, the entourage stopped at the Portuguese consulate in Bayonne. Here too, Mendes, still the official representative of his country for this region, issued visas to fleeing Jewish refugees, again in violation of instructions from Lisbon.

He saved these people's lives.

For this heroic act, Aristades De Sousa Mendes was recalled to Lisbon, fired from Portugal's diplomatic service, publicly dishonored and denied a pension by Salazar. He was forced to sell his family estate in Cabanas de Viriato to support his family and spent the rest of his life in poverty and obscurity, dying in 1954.

Aristades De Sousa was named a Righteous Gentile and is honored at Yad Vashem in Israel,the museum dedicated to the victims of the Holocaust

In 1988 Portugal's parliament voted unanimously to make amends and approved a bill that posthumously reinstated him as a diplomat, promoted him to the rank of ambassador and paid compensation to his surviving relatives, who used the money to repurchase the family home.

Aristades De Souza Mendes became a hero when he was put in circumstances where he simply made the choice to do the right thing, no matter what it cost him.

At a time when there is virtual silence by the UN in the face of genocidal threats of a second Holocaust by one of its members, his example is a welcome one for these troubled times. Some of us may very well be faced with a similar choice in the not too distant future.

Obrigado, o Senor De Sousa Mendes. E pode Deus abençoe a sua memória.





please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Keeping Each Other Honest

My pal Bookworm has a great piece up about the dynamism and interplay in the blogosphere:

When I was a young lawyer, I worked for an attorney who liked me to sit in the room and just listen to him dictate his briefs into his little hand-held Dictaphone. When I expressed concern that I was wasting client time, he assured me I was not. I was, he said, keeping him honest.

Merely by being in the room, I acted as a buffer against his tendency to exaggerate favorable facts, or to apply law to facts in illogical or even unethical ways. I also kept him from wandering off topic, since he was playing to me, the audience. (It helped that I knew the law, the facts, and the issues and could actually speak up when necessary, but it was my presence he desired most.)

I often think of this when I look at the difference between bloggers, on the one hand, and a whole host of idea makers, on the other hand, whether they reside in politics, journalism, academia or entertainment. Bloggers — and their readers — are a highly communicative and often combative lot. We leave comments (thousands of them) at blogs offering kudos, criticisms, information, data and corrections; we write whole posts riffing off of or criticizing someone’s thoughts; and we sometimes engage in blog wars, which periodically see vast numbers of others in the blogging community rushing to support one party or another to the combat.

Most importantly, all of this swirling intellectual energy and knowledge collaboration takes place on the same political side of the aisle. That is, I’m not describing a head-to-head combat between conservative and Progressive bloggers. Nope. I’m describing the elucidations, skirmishes, tiffs and battles that take place solely in the conservative salon.

I’m not complaining when I describe this vigorous atmosphere. I think it’s one of the best things about blogging, because it keeps us, the bloggers, honest. If I say something foolish, ill-informed, or offensive, someone will call me on it. (And because this is the conservative side of the blogosphere, I’ll usually be called on it very politely.)

This makes us bloggers very different from that other world of ideas that I referenced at the top of this post; namely, the world of journalism, politics, academia and entertainment. In those worlds, almost without exception, echo chambers and sycophancy are the name of the game. Supportive though this approach seems, it is a form of ideological suicide. People need constructive criticism, not from enemies, who can be discounted, but from those who fight on the same side that they do. Absent that kind of criticism, bad ideas, instead of being politely criticized out of existence, take on an illogical and dangerous life of their own.


Read the rest here

I would also add that it's not just other bloggers. Since we are so close to our readers, (blogging can get pretty intimate) we tend to operate out of respect for them and that keeps us honest as well.

And the interplay also waters the tree of ideas...at least it does for me.

I think that also applies to some of the best broadcasters, although since some of them are talking to millions of people they are of necessity a bit more removed.

When Rush Limbaugh returned to the air after getting married and apologized to his audience for keeping things so quiet he used the word "familial" to describe how he viewed them.

I understand where he was coming from.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Devastating New Ad - 'Mr. President, What Took You So Long?'



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Israel's Crucial Security Needs In Any Peace Settlement



People who have never been to Israel have no idea how small the area is that we're talking about, how vulnerable Israel is to attack from hostile neighbors or what the facts on the ground actually look like. This video, from the Jerusalem Center gives you an excellent idea of these factors and what Israel's security needs actually are to ensure any kind of viable and lasting peace.




(Hat tip, Carl)

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

UK Muslims Target Returning Troops' Homecoming Parade

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/06/15/article-1286784-0A0B5AE5000005DC-223_634x409.jpg

Now, it's true we have our own treasonous scum here on this side of the pond - but at least Code Pink are homegrown. We didn't import them:

Screaming hate and brandishing vile placards, Muslim extremists and far-Right groups clashed yesterday in ugly scenes that marred a parade by soldiers.

Around 40 members of a group called Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) arrived with inflammatory banners featuring slogans such as 'Butchers return' and 'What are you dying for? £18k'.

They were soon confronted by 100 people, some wearing English Defence League T-shirts, who shouted 'scum' and 'Muslim bombers off our streets'.

Police, who had received intelligence warning of trouble at the march in Barking, Essex, separated the groups behind barriers on opposite sides of the road.

But violence flared after 200 soldiers from 1st Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment - who lost five men in a recent tour of Afghanistan and had been granted freedom of the borough - marched past thousands of well-wishers.

The clashes came little over a year after Muslim extremists screamed 'baby killers' and 'rapists' at soldiers from 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment parading through Luton after a tour of duty in Iraq.

Members of the public who traveled to Barking yesterday to cheer the troops said they were 'disgusted' by what happened.

Charlene Byrne, 24, whose boyfriend Lance Corporal Scott Hardy was killed in an explosion near Musa Qala on March 16, said: 'They should never have been allowed to hijack this. Not everyone supports what's happening in Afghanistan - but they shouldn't take it out on the soldiers.'

Alex Mitchelson, 18, whose brother has completed two tours of Afghanistan, said: 'He would been disgusted by what happened here today. I had Muslim protesters racially abusing me as I walked by.'

The leader of Barking and Dagenham Council recently wrote to Home Secretary Theresa May asking her to ban MAC because he feared its extremist propaganda could cause violence.

Liam Smith acted after MAC posters about the protest, showing a bomber bursting through a flag of St George, appeared on the town's war memorial. Previous leaflets depicted British soldiers beside a bloody puddle in the shape of a skull.

Mr Smith said: 'We don't want these people with their hate-filled agenda in our borough.'

The MAC members - one of whom allegedly spat at a soldier - left after police gave them safe passage to Barking underground station by forming a human wall.


Note the quaking, whinging political correctness in this Daily Mail story - equating the 'far right' English Defense League, who came to defend their country and their soldiers with a bunch of Islamist thugs who despise everything Britain stands for except the welfare benefits they receive.

According to the article, after the spitting incident the pro-troop contingent finally lost patience with these fascists and their insults and waded into them, which is when the police formed a wall and gave the MAC an escort to the nearest subway.

Hopefully they took their time about it, so that a few members of the MAC will display some physical souvenirs as a reminder to be careful about insulting British troops in front of a home town crowd.

Freedom of speech means you can legally say what you want,but it doesn't mean there aren't any consequences.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Obama's Next Trick - Using The Lame Duck Session to Pass Cap N' Tax


At least we know now what last night's speech was really about...and it wasn't the Gulf Oil spill:

EXCLUSIVE: Phil Schiliro, the White House congressional liaison, has told the Senate to aim to take up an energy bill the week of July 12, after the July 4 break (and after the scheduled final passage of Wall Street reform). Kagan confirmation will follow, ahead of the summer break, scheduled to begin Aug. 9. The plan is to conference the new Senate bill with the already-passed House bill IN A LAME-DUCK SESSION AFTER THE ELECTION, so House members don’t have to take another tough vote ahead of midterms.

In case some of you don't realize the implications, let me spell this out.The midterms take place in November, but the new Congress doesn't seat until January. since Obama knows that the Democrats are likely to lose their majority in the House and might lose it in the Senate because of the nonsense he's already gotten through on straight party line votes, he plans on ramming through cap n' tax and whatever else he can manage in the interval between the election and the seating of the new Congress. He'll be using the votes of people who have already lost their seats, are already in a vindictive mood and have nothing to lose to do it,and the will of the people be damned.

The Republicans in the Senate need to filibuster and put whatever holds necessary they can to thwart this obscene tactic. And to ditto Jim Geraghty, every Republican challenger ought to call on his Democrat opponent repeatedly to formally pledge not to be part of this sleaze. Many of them won't of course, but then it becomes a legitimate campaign issue.




please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

The Next Gaza Flotilla Is Due This Weekend

According to my sources, two ships are en route, one from Iran and one from Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The Israelis have already said that they will not allow the ships to break the blockade.

Look for fireworks over the weekend.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Barack Obama's Oval Office Speech - The Fiction Cracks

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0134846e6fe8970c-350wi

You can't spend what you ain't got/ You can't lose what you ain't never had
- Muddy Waters

President Barack Hussein Obama finally deigned to address the nation regarding the Gulf Oil spill last night, and it was a memorable occasion. Not for anything he said,of course, but because it's going to be seen in the future as the point where even many of his True Believers finally realized that the emperor really is naked. And it wasn't a pretty sight.

After 56 days, what we got last night was 18 minutes of platitudes, only about 10 minutes of which actually dealt with the oil spill at all. The rest of it was essentially about how we're going to spend a trillion dollars we don't have to try to power our society on windmills and unicorn farts.

The oil spill part of the speech could perhaps have passed muster maybe on Day 3 of the spill. Almost two months into it, with local officials at their wit's end and seventeen federal agencies tripping over each other to comply with Federal diktats that are often contradictory and counterproductive, it was an insult to our intelligence.

Obama seems to have known that too. The first part of his speech was robotic and strained, although,like all bad actors his out of control hands revealed his nervousness and discomfort.

The short version of what we heard from President Ass Kicker last night was:


'we are engaged in a Great War On Oil Slick comparable to WWII and putting a man on the moon, and dammit, I'm going to make BP pay for this.I'll unleash the lawyers. Meanwhile, to show that I'm actually doing something, I came down to the beach, ate a bunch of seafood, appointed another czar and shut down all offshore oil drilling.



The spill was really Bush's fault, and anyway, what we really need to do is pass the largest tax increase in our history with cap and trade and get off oil entirely, because we're running out of places to drill.Thankyooverahmuch ladies and gentlemen, G'night!'

The truth of the matter is that Obama has done little or nothing to date about the spill because he was willing to delegate it to others, and they were unwilling to be decisive without a nod from Obama. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal asked for federal approval within days after the spill to do the extra dredging to build sand berms and barrier Islands to keep the oil off the coast and only got an approval a week ago when he finally got fed up, went loudly public and said he was going to build the barrier islands and berms whether they were approved or not.

The President had nothing to say in his speech last night about why the US refused to accept skimmers and expert assistance from the Dutch, or help from the Norwegians or from 13 other countries who offered aid in cleaning up the Gulf. Or why literally miles of oil booms are sitting in a Maine warehouse despite the fact that the administration was told about the supply almost a month ago.

This kind of inaction is nothing new for him, by the way. He behaved exactly the same way when it came to disasters in Kentucky and Nashville, except he didn't even give them the courtesy of a speech.

And by shutting down off shore drilling at a time when the country's in a deep recession, the president has likely idled 46,200 high paying jobs, and long term job losses could reach 120,000 by 2014.Not to mention the lost oil production and the accompanying hit on the economy.

Obama's handling of the Gulf Spill makes George W. Bush's handling of Hurricane Katrina look positively masterful..and I never thought I’d say that

In the last part of his speech, President Obama piled it on even deeper, talking about how we're running out of places to drill for oil and citing China as an example of a country that is investing in 'green energy'.

The truth? We're far from running out of places to drill. This report from the non-partisan Congressional Research Service estimates that the US has over 167 billion barrels of recoverable oil, a 75 year supply. And that doesn’t include our huge shale oil deposits or the huge amount of oil we could process cleanly and synthetically from the gasification of our coal reserves, technology that already exists.

And China? The 'green energy' the Chinese are investing in is nuclear power. Along with every source of oil they can get their hands on, including long term leases in Iraq, the fields Halliburton was able to save after Saddam set the wells on fire after we invaded.

The Chinese are smart enough to realize that nuclear energy is the only renewable energy that can run a booming economy as effectively and efficiently as fossil fuels. And while Obama has issued a lot of verbiage about nuclear power, he hasn't ordered even one new nuclear power plant to be built and has kept the approval process arcane and difficult to cater to his far Left environmentalist supporters - many who either already are or look to be making millions in government dollars for pushing things like biomass or wind energy.

As an interesting contrast, here's Governor Sarah Palin's take on this. Does anyone have any doubts that if she were in the White House even as vice president, this would have been handled very differently?

Aside from the obvious platitudes and prevarications, what we saw last night was the end of the Obama myth, and even a lot of his faithful soldiers on the Left recognized it, if you look at the various reactions to the speech. Even Mr. Thrill-up-my-leg, AKA Chris Matthews noticed how naked the emperor was last night.


please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Watcher's Council Nominations - Pre Father's Day Edition



The Watcher's Council is a group of some of the most incisive blogs in the`sphere. Every week, the members nominate two posts each, one of their own and one from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council.

Then we vote and choose the best ones in each category, with the results appearing here Friday.

So, let's see what we have this week....

Council Submissions

Non Council Submissions



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Absolutely Hysterical! Jon Stewart On Alvin Greene And The South Carolina Democratic Primary

Alvin Greene Wins South Carolina Primary
The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party


Do yourself a favor and don't watch this with a mouthful of liquid.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

The EU's Bizarro World View of Gaza

http://www.seoinc.com/seo-blog/wp-admin/images/bizarrocode.jpg

In the old Superman comics, there was a character called Bizarro who was a mirror image of Superman - that is everything was reversed, including speech patterns and notions of bad and good. There was, at one point, an entire planet named BizarroWorld that shared Bizarro's outlook.

Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice President of the European Commission provides us with a superb example of this kind of bizarro world view in a recent op-ed in the New York Times on Gaza.

Her ideas? Israel and Egypt should remove the Gaza blockade permanently and Israel should depend on what she referred to as the EU's 'highly trained staff members' to man the border crossings, keep out Iranian weaponry and allow in things that will allow what she calls 'normal, decent people, denied the chance to lead normal lives' to live in peace next to Israel.

She also makes the point that this is what the United Nations Security Council and the European Union have demanded, as well as what Israel agreed with the Palestinian Authority in 2005.

Let's examine this bizarro world position in a little detail.

Nowhere amid the strains of kumbayah exuded by Ms. Ashton does the nasty little fact emerge to soil her vision that these normal decent people she's so enamored of are the same ones who voted for the genocidal Hamas by a huge majority before there was any blockade.To listen to her, not only would one would never know that Hamas won an election, you wouldn't even know that they're in full control of the Gaza Strip!

Ms. Ashton also doesn't seem to be able to bear to mention that Hamas is a proxy of Iran,and that that without the Israeli/Egyptian blockade the larger, deadlier arms shipments from Iran and Syria like Grad missiles(which can only be transported by ship) can come in, just as they did with Hezbollah right under the UN's nose in defiance of its own Security Council Resolution 1701.

Does she really expect the Israelis to sit back and watch that happen again in Gaza?

In fact the entire notion of those 'trained staff members on the ground who could help implement this at Gaza’s border' is a ludicrous joke to anyone who remembers the events of the last few years. When the Israelis left Gaza, they were assured by the EU and the US that Gaza would never become a security risk for Israel because they would monitor the border crossings and take action to make sure no heavy weapons were smuggled in.

When Hamas took over Gaza in a bloody coup in 2007, those 'highly trained EU monitors' stationed at border crossings like the one in Rafah ran like scared rabbits for the Israeli border. Nor did the EU (or the US, for that matter) do a single thing to prevent Hamas from receiving Iranian arms to attack Israel. What Ms. Ashton and her cohorts in the EU are essentially saying is 'hey Israel, forget about what happened before in Lebanon and in Gaza. Trust us!'

What the Israelis constantly get from the so-called international community Catherine Ashton represents is nothing but inconsequential fantasy about 'human rights' that carefully excludes the right of Israel's self-defense and does nothing to deal with the reason for the blockade - Hamas receiving arms from Iran and Syria and using them to attack Israel. Instead of dealing with that piece of reality, they're far too busy currying favor with the Muslim world by condemning Israel for the singular sin of defending itself.

Bizarro world indeed.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Why Bob Ethridge Was Within His Rights

Congressman Bob Ethridge, a North Carolina 7 term Democrat incumbent is in the news because of a widely shown video showing a scrap he had with two 'college kids' on a DC street who essentially ambushed him with videocameras outside a Nancy Pelosi fundraiser:



Now, I don't know anything about Congressman Ethridge, and if I did I probably wouldn't like it.And I wouldn't be surprised to find that, politically speaking, our views are 180 degrees apart.

I realize that a lot of you won't agree with me, but I think he was entirely within his rights, if perhaps a bit too forceful about it.

Ethridge is walking down the street minding his own business when out pops someone with a video camera, asking him 'do you agree with the Obama agenda?'

Before he went off, he asked the cameraman several times "Who are you? Who are you with?" and received no answer. For all he knew,they were working for his Republican opponent in a tough election campaign, filming footage that could later be digitally altered and used against him. So he slapped the camera away from his face and grabbed the camera man, continuing to ask who he was and whom he was with.

The polite and normal way to approach a public figure you want to interview is to say hello, introduce yourself and politely ask if your target minds answering a few questions.What happened to Ethridge was basically an assault, and he was given no choice in the matter.

One of the things I've always found pleasant about the South when I've visited is a sense of basic etiquette and decorum - a sort of informal formality, if you will - that percolates through Southern society.

What an old school Southerner like Ethridge saw here was his dignity being assaulted. And he reacted. The NRO's Jim Geraghty underlines this unwittingly as he writes on the reactions of many of Ethridge's fellow Southerners in his home town paper, a lot of whom thoroughly understood his actions.

As this point, Ethridge has apologized and doubtless, he could have handled it better.But so could the two ill-mannered video muggers who impinged on his privacy and assaulted him.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Monday, June 14, 2010

Check Out The Hilarious New Socialist 'Life' Board Game!!



Hat tip and a commendation to Joshua's Army member Leilani!


please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

In Honor Of Old Glory



Today is Flag Day, so it's an appropriate day to post this tribute to The Star Spangled Banner. An interesting arrangement of all four verses..and pay particular attention to the words, especially the ones in the last verse.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Watchman Saves Lives At Popular Suicide Spot

http://oglobo.globo.com/blogs/arquivos_upload/2010/04/132_646-alt-don%20ritchie%2004.jpg

This story from Australia intrigued me:

A former life insurance salesman has "sold life" to scores of people trying to end it all at Australia's most notorious suicide spot.

In nearly 50 years Don Ritchie, 84, has saved at least 160 people at The Gap, a rocky cliff at the entrance to Sydney Harbour - and he is still on suicide watch.

Lost souls who stood atop the cliff, wondering whether to jump, say their salvation was a soft voice breaking the sound of the wind and the waves, asking: "Why don't you come and have a cup of tea?"

And when they turned to the stranger, they say his smile made them want to live.

Mr Ritchie, who lives across the street
from The Gap, is widely regarded as a guardian angel who has shepherded countless people away from the edge.

What some consider grim, Mr Ritchie considers a gift.

"You can't just sit there and watch them," he said, perched on his beloved green leather chair, from which he keeps a watchful eye on the cliff outside.

"You gotta try and save them. It's pretty simple."

Since the 1800s, Australians have flocked to The Gap to end their lives, with little more than a 3ft fence separating them from the edge. Local officials say around one person a week commits suicide there and in January, Woollahra Council applied for nearly £1.2 million government funding to build a higher fence and tighten security.

In the meantime, Mr Ritchie keeps up his voluntary watch. The council recently named him and his wife of 58 years, Moya, 2010's Citizens of the Year.

He has saved 160 people, according to the official tally, but that is only an estimate. Mr Ritchie does not keep count but says he has watched far more walk away from the edge than go over it.


Chesed, the quality of kindness is a strange but impressive magic. It apparently works on someone like Don Ritchie to put himself out for his fellow human beings when others might walk away or flee, and that same quality makes a number of them respond to him.

Apparently it almost cost him his own life once, and there's was famous picture in the Australian press showing Don Ritchie in his younger years struggling with a woman trying to throw herself over the side, only inches from the precipice.

Ritchie claims he never tries to counsel people or give advice, but to merely give someone at the end of their rope a little warmth and human kindness to bring them back from the brink.

Sometimes, that's all it takes.

-selah-

http://puffeltufflan.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/guardian_angel.jpg


please donate...it helps me write more gooder!