Sunday, July 11, 2010

Abbas: 'No point in direct talks with Israel now'


Mahmoud Abbas made it very clear that regardless of whatever went on in Washington between Israeli PM Netanyahu and President Obama, he's not signing on to sitting down directly with Israel unless he's guaranteed everything he wants in advance.

"We have presented our vision and thoughts and said that if progress is made, we will move to direct talks, but that if no progress is made, it (direct negotiations) will be futile," Abbas said.

"If they (the Israelis) say `come and let's start negotiations from zero,' that is futile and pointless," Abbas added.

Abbas' latest pre-conditions to even sit at the table are designed to make sure that it never happens. He demands that Netanyahu agree to an internationally mandated 'settlement freeze', which means the Israelis are essentially going to be unable to build anything in the areas the Palestinians claim for themselves while the Palestinians get free reign to build whatever they want.And he insists that negotiations start by writing in stone as a starting point an offer disgraced Israeli ex-PM Olmert supposedly made to him that was neither accepted by the Palestinians at the time or even cleared with the Israeli Knesset or cabinet - let alone the Israeli electorate!

The Israeli term chutzpah doesn't even begin to cover this nonsense.To twist the old Mafia phrase around, it's an offer designed to be refused.

The real story is that Abbas not only has no incentive to change things right now, he has lots of very good reasons not to.

The Palestinian Authority has the most anti-Israel and pro-Arab President in Washington that it has ever had, and Obama's administration has showered hundreds of millions of dollars in direct aid to the Palestinians, as well as spending additional millions to build, train and equip a Fatah army under General Keith Dayton. There's plenty of money around, and a lot of it, as usual, is being siphoned off to well-connected Fatah pockets. In exchange, Obama has demanded virtually nothing from the Palestinians, and increased his demand for unilateral concessions from Israel.

Abbas Knows Obama will be in for two and a half more years, so why change the status quo when it's so favorable?

It's also worth looking at what an actual peace deal with Israel would mean for Fatah and Abbas. What Netanyahu wants is a final settlement and an end to the conflict, and that's impossible for Abbas to deliver even if he wanted to.

The entire Palestinian ethos is riveted to the idea that someday, the Jews will be driven out forcibly and all of Israel will belong to the Palestinians. It's what Palestinians are constantly programmed with in their schools,mosques and media. And there's no way Abbas can settle for anything less, just like his old boss Arafat couldn't.An end to the conflict that doesn't include the Jews being removed from Israel is simply not going to be accepted by the Palestinians.

An end to the war against the Jews would mean that the Palestinians essentially would have nothing else holding them together and would fragment into warring clans and factions. It would be the end of Fatah as well, as Hamas would soon take over the Palestinian occupied areas of Judea and Samaria (AKA the West Bank).

And finally, it would mean the end of Abbas, personally. No Arab leader who ever made peace with Israel has survived for very long except King Hussein of Jordan, and that's only because he died soon afterwards - after a couple of near misses.

Mahmoud Abbas isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, but he understands that much.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Why Do So Many Gays Bash Israel?

An interesting question...

It's simply a fact that Israel is virtually the only country in the Middle East where homosexuals can live in peace. And that includes 'democratic' Iraq.

As a matter of fact, as one of my correspondents who definitely ought to know has written me,the Shin Bet knows about a number of gay Palestinian men living illegally in Israel but has taken no steps to deport them because it would be a death sentence.

Yet a surprisingly large number of homosexuals, especially in Europe actively engage in Israel bashing.

European journalist Benjamin Weinthal has a very interesting piece in The Gay City News exploring this, using recent examples in Spain, where an Israeli float was barred from the Gay Pride parade to places like Toronto, where violently anti-Israel groups like Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QAIA) were allowed to march in the parade.

Again, one of my correspondents has written me about the strange sight of homosexual groups like Queers For Palestine as well as Leftist Feminist groups teaming up with the local Islamists for violent anti-Israel demonstrations at Regent's Park in London.

Weinthal presents a very revealing quote from the late German Hard Left author Eike Geisel that goes a long way towards revealing how twisted and self-hating this kind of thinking has become:

“To be against Israel in the name of peace is something new. For this hostility has cast off any practical or political motives… This new anti-Semitism does not arise from base instincts, nor is it the product of honorable political intentions. It is the morality of morons. Anti-Jewish… hostility arises from the purest human needs; it comes from the yearning for peace. It is therefore entirely innocent; it is as universal as it is moral. This moral anti-Semitism completes Germany’s restoration to goodness, in that it heralds the perfection of inhumanity: the banality of good.”

Notice that Geisel writes about anti-Semitism and does not differentiate it from anti-Israel sentiment. I give her full marks for honesty and clarity.

res ipsa loquiter.


please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Sarah Palin's New Video - The First Shot Of The 2012 Campaign?




please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Friday, July 09, 2010

San Francisco Pols Table 'No Pets' Law

In a meeting last night, the San Francisco Commission of Animal Control and Welfare voted to table proposed legislation that would have banned all pet sales in the city.

I wonder if the gerbil and hamster lovers lobby threatened to sue...

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Israeli Political Satire At Its Finest - The Latest LATMA Update



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Watcher's Council Results, 7/09/10



The Council has spoken! Here are the results of our weekly Watcher's Council contest.

This week's council winner was Wolf Howling for Obama’s Lawsuit Against Arizona (Updated), a fine examination of the hypocrisy politicization of our current Justice Department.

Our non-Council winner was the one and only Caroline Glick for Standing down the hanging jury, a great piece on resistance to the perverted use of the courts to promote Israel bashing.

Here are the full results:

Council Winners

Non-Council Winners

As always, congratulations not only to the winners but to the participants.


please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Thursday, July 08, 2010

Federal Judge Rules Federal Gay Marriage Ban Unconstitutional

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibjwW7ZrxV3UXfIX_HJOQOZ8RO6rLJgaAg2IDkjyWzWVkcUEtO7kt1HriHm3svys2X6olKOmaMYUbw3MXdDrAL3YBPrWw7p1C1AQyLJ2cEIDXz_s2TRyc8jBGp6FxYZHq0xDop/s320/California_gay_marriages.jpg

Judge Joseph Tauro in the federal district court in Massachusetts has issued a ruling that declared that the part of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)that defines marriage as a union exclusively between a man and a woman is unconstitutional.

Tauro based his ruling on the Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

As he pointed out, individual states have long had their own marriage requirements and laws, and their are numerous precedents of the federal government consistently yielding to marital status laws established by the individual states.

The other basis for the ruling, the often abused Equal Protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment is a great deal shakier in my opinion - especially since Massachusetts, along with many other states has enacted laws to give same sex couples essentially the same rights and protections married couples have, sometimes under so-called domestic partner statutes.

This will undoubtedly affect the coming State Supreme Court ruling on California's Proposition 8, which also defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

That ruling was actually expected to be announced this evening, so there's some speculation that the California Supreme Court waited to see what the Boston Court decided.

If the California court rules that Prop 8 is illegal and cites Tauro's Massachusetts ruling, there's an interesting dichotomy.

Since Prop 8 was voted into California law by a huge majority, it obviously doesn't violate state's rights as outlined in the Tenth Amendment. And since even California's Supreme Court Justices themselves admitted that California law eliminates any difference in rights between same sex partners and heterosexual married couples, it's hard to see how they would make the Equal Protection clause argument fly.

Either way, this is likely headed to the Supreme Court.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

New CENTCOM Commander - Marine General James Mattis

http://schema-root.org/region/americas/north_america/usa/government/branches/executive/departments/defense/marine_corps/generals/james_mattis/james_mattis.jpg

In an interesting swap, Marine General James Mattis, who used to serve under General David Petraeus will now be his superior as he Mattis assumes command of CENTCOM.

It's an excellent appointment in my view.

Mattis and Petraeus have known and worked with each other for a long time, and Mattis, like Petraeus is an innovator and well up on the COIN strategy, with both the positives and negatives that implies. Mattis was instrumental in updating Marine Corps training for Iraq and Afghanistan and is known as a no-nonsense, aggressive commander who understands when to win hearts and minds and when to come in with guns blazing.

He got into some trouble back in 2005 with SecDef Gates for some Patton-esque remarks he made to a group in San Diego:

"Actually, it's a lot of fun to fight. You know, it's a hell of a hoot. ... It's fun to shoot some people."

He directed that sentiment toward "guys" in Afghanistan "who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them," he said.

Gates has a long memory and passed Mattis over for the top spot in the Marine Corps, but now Mattis will be head of CENTCOM, where he's likely to be a lot less high profile.

If Afghanistan can be turned into any kind of good outcome, Petraeus and Mattis are the team to do it.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

San Francisco To Consider Banning Pet Sales

http://markinlondon.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/no-pets.jpg

San Francisco continues to be America's surefire joke material - rivaled perhaps only by its East Bay neighbor Berkeley.

The latest frolic by Gommorah-on-the-Bay concerns a new law under consideration by San Francisco's Commission of Animal Control and Welfare that would ban all pet sales..except for fish.

"People buy small animals all the time as an impulse buy, don't know what they're getting into, and the animals end up at the shelter and often are euthanized," said commission Chairwoman Sally Stephens. "That's what we'd like to stop."

San Francisco residents who want a pet - or as they're known in enlightened circles, 'companion animals' - would either have to buy one outside the city or adopt from a shelter.

Oddly enough, the biggest problem is rodents like hamsters, which by far account for the greatest percentage of animals turned in to the city's shelters, according to San Francisco Animal Care and Control director Rebecca Katz.

"It's definitely a concern," she said. "They're an impulse buy, and we do sometimes get tons of them, especially babies."

Tons
of hamsters? Gerbils? Guinea pigs?

Now I certainly wouldn't want to cast any aspersions, but San Francisco is known for its numerous and high profile component of kinksters of various kinds, and there's that old story about actor Richard Gere I seem to recall...all those used rodents being dumped at the shelters..hmm.

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/sm/custom/qcdbbhqj.jpeg

Nah. Couldn't be a correlation.

Being the public minded person I am, I will once again offer my former home town yet another suggestion to make lemonade out of lemons.

Rather than euthanize the beasts, why not breed them? Think of the applications..a cheap source of meat for school lunch programs, the jails, a partially subsidized City employees cafeteria program...it's the ultimate employee benefit. And the best part is that nobody really has to know. All you need is a few dedicated City employees to do the um..processing discretely, and I'm sure Mayor Gavin Newsome knows where to find a few of those lurking around.

You're quite welcome.

At any rate, the commission is going to decide on this one in a special meeting tonight, although the Board of Supervisors would have final say on the matter.

I'll keep you posted.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Watcher's Council Nominations - July 7 , 2010



The Watcher's Council is a group of some of the most incisive blogs in the`sphere. Every week, the members nominate two posts each, one of their own and one from outside the group for consideration by the whole Council.Then we vote on the best posts, with the results appearing on Friday.

So, let's see what we have this week....

Council Submissions

Non-Council Submissions



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

The Democrats New Scam - Tax ATM Withdrawals

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRQz_tzKOCfw37sQYwbq679jCW_OyP7p2TnGQgWQhW5LMZf6ZWvNKXAI1i-XAsKExdCPp4C9nrUDr8Tb7dSRrfnEosiSbLa2YJmegOVN3muumTkS5u1j6w-r0EkZ7XYx9v56_V/s400/IRS.jpg


As the bills for the Democrats in Congress and President Barack Hussein Obama's out-of-control spending come due, the Democrats are looking for new ways to grab more of our money to pay for it.

Their latest scheme? How about a 1% tax on all financial transactions, including things like accessing your own money in your own bank account?

Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.)has proposed exactly that, as an editorial out by Democrat flack Lanny Davis reveals. His “Debt Free America Act” (H.R. 4646) would hit Americans for 1 percent “transaction tax” on every financial transaction — whether it involves cash, credit cards or any form of financial transfer, with the only exception being transactions involving the purchase or sale of stock.

That's a one point fee on everything - $200 bucks on a $20,000 car purchase, a nickle added to your $5 Starbucks addiction, an extra .20 every time you hit the ATM for a quick twenty, an extra two grand on a $200,00 home loan - direct from your pocket to the guv'mint.

My, my...a tax every time you move money around. That's only skimming a mere 1% of $443 trillion off of the economy. Why, that's only 30% of GDP, so we'll never miss it. And of course, nobody's going to try to avoid this tax by changing their behavior. people aren't going to stop using banks and ATMs or sending wire transfers or taking out loans, right? This couldn't possibly cause a liquidity crisis or lead to even more unemployment, no?

This is simply a VAT ( Value Added Tax) by another name. And just like all VATs the government's piece of the action will invariably rise as they find more things to spend our money on.

Does anyone really think that once Obama and the Democrats get this scam through that it's going to stay at a mere 1%? And not be extended to other kinds of transactions?

Nor do I trust them to keep this in a trust fund and use it to pay down the national debt. Remember Social Security? That particular Ponzi scheme was raped of it's money, and the so-called 'Social Security lockbox' consists of one large IOU.

Here's a better plan. Cut Federal spending by a penny on the dollar each year, on a month by month basis.Hey, they'll never miss it. And by the end of two years they'll be spending 25% less.

While we're at it, we can save even more money by eliminating any number of wasteful government programs and departments that serve no purpose except to keep an army of politically well-connected bureaucrats in well-paid positions. How much money are Obama's 40+ czars sucking up, for instance? And since Obama's 'stimulus' obviously was so much wasted cash, why not use the 50% of it or so he hasn't spent yet to pay down the $1.6 trillion deficit he ran up this last fiscal year? Instead of leaving it as slush fund for him and his political allies?

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Iowahawk Wants Andrew Breitbart's Money

http://29.media.tumblr.com/IsxlJHgIQnu5t3rfJoPLgTCGo1_500.jpg

As most of you know by now, faux conservative blogger Dave Weigel was busted over at the Washington Post by someone unknown who leaked the e-mail insults, death threats and school boy obscenities posted on uber Lefty blogger Ezra Klein's 'secret' site for media Lefty columnists and bloggers, Journolist.

Andrew Breitbart has offered a cool $100k for the archives, and none other than Iowahawk has 'em and is looking to collect:

Welcome to the Journolist Top Secret Progressive He-Man Wingnut Haters Club and L33t H4xoR Chat Room. Disclaimer: this is a private discussion forum intended solely for the benefit of JournoList members. Reproduction, transmission, redistribution, or description, in whole or in part, of any content (including, but not limited to, private insults, insider innuendo, political manifestos, hair styling tips and/or gossip) without the expressed written consent of the commissioner is strictly prohibited. Please read and agree to the User Consent Form. And, as always, remember the first rule of JournoList: there is no JournoList.

EZRA KLEIN has entered the room.
MATTHEW YGLESIAS has entered the room.
ERIC BOEHLERT has entered the room.

JOSH MARSHALL has entered the room.

EZRA KLEIN: wassup

MATTHEW YGLESIAS: my dick

JOSH MARSHALL: lolz!!! :D

EZRA KLEIN: hahahahahaha

MATTHEW YGLESIAS: whos got assignmt for 1st period talking points for tomorrow

JOSH MARSHALL: boehlert was supposed to get them from Mr Soros..

Read it all, it's funneee! ( language warning)

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

NASA Unveils New Muslim Space Plan!!

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_sSZEt13lZJE/S347JeaqMMI/AAAAAAAAA_E/leu7VnTBhuE/s400/NASA%20Muslim%20Outreach.jpg


My pal Daniel Greenfield, AKA Sultan Knish brings da funny in the Canada Free Press with something I sure wish I'd written:

Barack H. Obama
666 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20006

Dear Sir,

I cannot tell you how much we appreciate your budget cuts, your cancellation of the space shuttle and any replacement launch vehicle for it, forcing us to rely on Russian Soyuz ships and their space program, which can’t even seem to dock with the ISS Space Station.

Your wise decision in this regard, as well as your cancellation of any return trip to the moon, has caused us to reevaluate many of our programs, including the search for intelligent life on earth. We understand of course that space exploration must take a backseat to more important matters, such as bailing out the car companies and banks who contributed to your campaign. And of course the White House entertainment budget. Your historic actions since taking office have truly challenged us as an agency. We can only hope to one day be able to return the favor.

After carefully reviewing your new priority for NASA, to reach out to Muslims and make them feel good about “their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering”, which consisted mainly of ripping off Greek and Indian science, and passing it off as their own, we have developed a comprehensive plan for utilizing the talents and abilities of Muslims to further the goals of this nation’s goals space program, which you so articulately described as “That Outer Spacey Thing”.

Project 1: HATE Ignition

Project HATE proposes to solve NASA’s difficulties with liquid fuel rockets by employing Muslim technological innovation to achieve a new and inexpensive means of reaching Low Earth Orbit. We propose to use the greatest Muslim technological invention of the last 50 years, the suicide bomber (and by invention I mean they stole that from Asia too) to replace liquid fuel propellant.

Project HATE (Highly Active Terrorist Explosions) will chain together a long string of suicide bombers within each booster rocket. The suicide bombers will be assured of 72 virgins in paradise, and each one will detonate after the other to form a daisy chain of explosions that will take the shuttle up into the sky.

Our best math suggests that it will take approximately 3000 suicide bombers within the SRBs to provide adequate liftoff thrust for the shuttle launch. We will need the Muslim world to cooperate with us by providing 3000 suicide bombers for each and every shuttle launch. The benefit of this is that not only will this reduce the cost of shuttle launches, but it will also save untold billions in the War on Terror.

Project 2: Throw Things at the Jews

While we have been making efforts to reach out to Muslim countries and engage them in purely peaceful space exploration, our preliminary findings is that their main interest in space is to get into space in order to, and I quote, “Throw Things Down on the Jews”. And Muslim technological developments in rocketry and launch vehicles such as Saddam’s Space Gun “Big Babylon” and Iran’s nuclear weapons programs all have the common aim of “Throwing Things Down on the Jews”.

We at NASA believe that the best way to interest Muslims in space is to convince them of its potential for “Throwing Things at the Jews”, but in a way that benefits all of mankind, and doesn’t lead to any loss of life. As you may possibly know (or would if you did something besides golf and spend money all day) Earth is at risk of one day being struck by an asteroid that could potentially wipe out all life on the planet.

Utilizing your brilliant suggestion that we “go land on an asteroid”, we plan to send an automated vehicle to an asteroid and deposit an Israel flag on an asteroid that may one day hit Earth. We are confident that the Muslim world will immediately step up and join forces with us to develop long range weapons capable of hitting that asteroid. Particularly if we also leave a tape player on its surface blasting, “Hava Nagilla”.

Not only will this provide Earth with a poorly aimed global defense network against falling rocks from the sky, but it will also hopefully prevent rockets from being fired at schools, instead of into space where they belong.



Gotta read it all..

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Another Democrat Senate Seat In Play??

Via Jennifer Rubin, this tidbit - the late Senator Robert Byrd's Democrat Senate seat in West Virginia might also be up for grabs this November:

West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin voiced support for holding a special election this year to fill the late Sen. Robert Byrd’s seat, announcing that he would request a legal opinion from the state attorney general to determine if a vote could be held. Manchin, a Democrat who said he would be “highly” interested in running for the seat himself, expressed discomfort with Secretary of State Natalie Tennant’s ruling that the governor should name a placeholder to the seat until it comes up for election in 2012.


His opponent in a November 2010 special election would likely be popular Republican Congresswoman Shelley Moore Capito, in a state McCain carried handily over Obama.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Obama Apoints Radical 'Rationing Expert' To Head Medicare and Medicaid

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/07/07/us/recess/recess-articleInline.jpg

President Obama used a recess appointment that bypassed Congress to appoint Dr. Donald M. Berwick to head Medicare and Medicaid, two health programs that insure over a third of the American people.These organizations are run by employees who primary duties and salaries come from medical billing.

Recess appointments are not unknown, but this one extremely unusual because the Senate is in recess for less than two weeks and senators were still waiting for Dr. Berwick to submit responses to some of their requests for information. Normally, recess appointments are used in an emergency. Or, as in the case of John Bolton during the Bush Administration, a confirmation hearing has been in process and the nomination is being held up by one or two senators.

This is also different because recess appointments are almost never used for positions that formulate and implement policy, which is what Dr. Berwick will be doing.

There are a number of good reasons why President Obama felt the need to essentially sneak Dr. Donald Berwick past Congress.

Remember Sarah Palin's Death Panels, AKA The Independent Medical Advisory Boards that are such an important part of of ObamaCare? Dr. Berwick is a long standing advocate of such health care rationing.

In an interview last year with Biotechnology Healthcare, Berwick said society makes decisions about rationing all the time, and that the "decision is not whether or not we will ration care -- the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. And right now, we are doing it blindly."

He also is very honest about using Obamacare for what it was actually intended to be - a tool for the redistribution of wealth:



Here's the money quote: “Any health care funding plan that is just equitable civilized and humane must, must redistribute wealth from the richer among us to the poorer and the less fortunate. Excellent health care is by definition redistributional.” - Dr. Donald Berwick

You can watch the full speech here, and there are a number of quotes by Dr. Berwick that are worth looking at - particularly clear is his hatred for the idea of the private sector being involved in health care and his love affair for the UK-style National Health nightmare.

You now have a very good idea of what you can expect with Dr. Berwick overseeing the implementation of ObamaCare. He is essentially a clone of Obama's beliefs on the matter.

And it's also obvious why a recess appoint was needed. With over 60% of the American people already favoring repeal of ObamaCare and the midterms coming up, the last thing Obama and the Democrats wanted was to reopen the debate by having some one like this grilled by the Senate with the midterms coming up in a couple of months.

Berwick will be in heading the nuts and bolts part of ObamaCare until the new Congress sits in January of 2011.

Elections have consequences. Remember in November.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Levi Johnston Apologizes To Palin Family: '...Said Things that Were Not True'

Well, better late than never, I suppose.

Bristol Palin's ex Levi Johnston got his fifteen minutes of fame by bashing the Palins and telling bizarre tales about their inner family life, especially Sarah Palin and milking that for TV appearences, interview fees and and a spread in Playgirl.

Now that's dried up, he's apparently realized exactly how damaging those sort of things have been to the mother of his child and her family, and how that's likely to look to his son in the future. So he's admitted that most of it was sheer lies and prevarication. which is no news tomost of us.

"Last year, after Bristol and I broke up, I was unhappy and a little angry. Unfortunately, against my better judgment, I publicly said things about the Palins that were not completely true.

I have already privately apologized to Todd and Sarah. Since my statements were public, I owe it to the Palins to publicly apologize.

So to the Palin family in general and to Sarah Palin in particular, please accept my regrets and forgive my youthful indiscretion", Johnston says in the statement. "I hope one day to restore your trust."


Andrew Sullivan must be sitting at home,burning candles, cuddling the Winter 2010 Playgirl in his arms and crying his eyes out...

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

The Full Transcript Of Netanyahu And Obama's Remarks And Press Conference

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01405/Netanyahu_1405701c.jpg

You'll notice that this particular presser was a quickie affair, with only two questions allowed.


Remarks by PM Netanyahu and U.S. President Obama
The White House, 6 July 2010

President Obama: I just completed an excellent one-on-one discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu, and I want to welcome him back to the White House. I want to first of all thank him for the wonderful statement that he made in honor of the 4th of July, our Independence Day, when he was still in Israel.

It marked just one more chapter in the extraordinary friendship between our two countries. As Prime Minister Netanyahu indicated in his speech, the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable. It encompasses our national security interests, our strategic interests, but most importantly the bond of two democracies who share a common set of values and whose people have grown closer and closer as time goes on.

During our discussions in our private meeting, we covered a wide range of issues. We discussed the issue of Gaza. And I commended Prime Minister Netanyahu on the progress that's been made in allowing more goods into Gaza. We've seen real progress on the ground. I think it's been acknowledged that it has moved more quickly and more effectively than many people anticipated.

Obviously, there are still tensions and issues there that have to be resolved, but our two countries are working cooperatively together to deal with these issues. The Quartet has been, I think, very helpful as well. And we believe that there is a way to make sure that the people of Gaza are able to prosper economically while Israel is able to maintain its legitimate security needs in not allowing missiles and weapons to get to Hamas.

We discussed the issue of Iran. And we pointed out that as a consequence of some hard work internationally, we have instituted, through the U.N. Security Council, the toughest sanctions ever directed at an Iranian government.

In addition, last week, I signed our own set of sanctions coming out of the United States Congress - as robust as any that we've ever seen. Other countries are following suit. And so we intend to continue to put pressure on Iran to meet its international obligations and to cease the kinds of provocative behavior that has made it a threat to its neighbors and the international community.

We had an extensive discussion about the prospects for Middle East peace. I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu wants peace. I think he's willing to take risks for peace. And during our conversation, he once again reaffirmed his willingness to engage in serious negotiations with the Palestinians around what I think should be the goal not just of the two principals involved, but the entire world; and that is two states living side-by-side in peace and security.

Israel's security needs met, the Palestinians having a sovereign state that they call their own: those are goals that have obviously escaped our grasp for decades now. But now more than ever I think is the time for us to seize on that vision. And I think that Prime Minister Netanyahu is prepared to do so.

It's going to be difficult. It's going to be hard work. But we've seen already proximity talks taking place. My envoy, George Mitchell, has helped to organize five of them so far. We expect those proximity talks to lead to direct talks. And I believe that the government of Israel is prepared to engage in such direct talks. And I commend the prime minister for that.

There are going to need to be a whole set of confidence-building measures, to make sure that people are serious and that we're sending a signal to the region that this isn't just more talk and more process without action.

I think it is also important to recognize that the Arab states have to be supportive of peace, because although ultimately this is going to be determined by the Israeli and Palestinian peoples, they can't succeed unless you have the surrounding states having a greater investment in the process than we've seen so far.

Finally we discussed issues that arose out of the nuclear nonproliferation conference. And I reiterated to the prime minister that there is no change in U.S. policy when it comes to these issues. We strongly believe that given its size, its history, the region that it's in, and the threats that are leveled against it that Israel has unique security requirements. It's got to be able to respond to threats or any combination of threats in the region. And that's why we remain unwavering in our commitment to Israel's security. And the United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would undermine their security interests.

So I just want to say once again that I thought the discussion that we had was excellent. We've seen over the last year how our relationship has broadened; sometimes it doesn't get publicized but on a whole range of issues - economic, military-to-military, issues related to Israel maintaining its qualitative military edge, intelligence sharing, how we are able to work together effectively on the international front - that in fact, our relationship is continuing to improve.

And I think a lot of that has to do with the excellent work that the prime minister has done, so I'm grateful. And welcome, once again, to the White House. Thank you.


PM Netanyahu: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Thank you.

The President and I had an extensive, excellent discussion in which we discussed a broad range of issues. These include of course our own cooperation in the fields of intelligence and security. And exactly as the President said, it is extensive. Not everything is seen by the public. But it is seen and appreciated by us. We understand fully that we will work together in the coming months and years to protect our common interests, our countries, our peoples against new threats and at the same time we want to explore the possibilities of peace.

The greatest new threat on the horizon and the single most dominant issue for many of us is the prospect that Iran would acquire nuclear weapons. Iran is brutally terrorizing its people, spreading terrorism far and wide. And I very much appreciate the President's statement that he is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. That has been translated by the President into his leadership at the Security Council, which passed sanctions against Iran; by the U.S. bill that the President signed just a few days ago. And I urge other leaders to follow the President's lead and other countries to follow the U.S. lead, to adopt much tougher sanctions against Iran, primarily those directed against its energy sector.

As the President said, we discussed a great deal about activating - moving forward - the quest for peace between Israel and the Palestinians. We're committed to that peace. I'm committed to that peace. And this peace I think will better the lives of Israelis, of Palestinians; and certainly would change our region.

Israelis are prepared to do a lot to get that peace in place, but they want to make sure that after all the steps they take, that what we get is a secure peace. We don't want a repeat of the situation where we vacate territories and those are overtaken by Iran's proxies and used as launching ground for terrorist attacks or rocket attacks.

I think there are solutions that we can adopt. But in order to proceed to the solutions, we need to begin negotiations in order to end them. We've begun proximity talks. I think it's high time to begin direct talks. I think with the help of President Obama, President Abbas and myself should engage in direct talks to reach a political settlement of peace, coupled with security and prosperity. This requires that the Palestinian Authority prepare its people for peace in schools, textbooks and so on.

But I think at the end of the day peace is the best option for all of us, and I think we have a unique opportunity and a unique time to do it. The President says that he has a habit of confounding all the cynics and all the naysayers and all those who preclude possibilities. And he's shown it time and time again. I think I've had my opportunity to confound some cynics myself. And I think if we work together with President Abbas, then we can bring a great message of hope to our peoples, to the region and to the world.

One final point. Mr. President, I want to thank you for reaffirming to me in private and now in public, as you did, the long- standing U.S. commitments to Israel on matters of vital strategic importance. I want to thank you too for the great hospitality you and the first lady have shown Sarah and me and our entire delegation.

And I think we have to redress the balance. You know, I've been coming here a lot. It's about time you -

President Obama: I'm ready.

PM Netanyahu: - and the first lady came to Israel.

President Obama: We look forward to it.

PM Netanyahu: So (anytime ?).

President Obama: Thank you.

PM Netanyahu: Anytime.

President Obama: Thank you very much.

PM Netanyahu: Thank you.

President Obama: Thank you. Good.

All right, we got time for one question each. I'm going to call on Stephen Collinson, AFP.


Q: Thank you, Mr. President. As far as the steps which need to be taken to move possibly - (off mike) - direct talks, do you think it will be helpful for Israel to extend the - (off mike) - settlement moratoriums set to expire in September? And if I could briefly ask the prime minister, with regards to the sanctions measures, do you think that these measures will contain or halt Iran's nuclear program - (off mike)?

President Obama: Well, let me first of all say that I think the Israeli government, working through layers of various governmental entities and jurisdictions, have shown restraint, over the last several months, that I think has been conducive to the prospects of us getting into direct talks.

And my hope is, is that once direct talks have begun, well before the moratorium has expired, that that will create a climate in which everybody feels a greater investment and success, not every action, by one party or the other, is taken as a reason for not engaging in talks, so there ends up being more room created by more trust. And so, you know, I want to just make sure that we sustain that over the next several weeks.

I do think that there are a range of confidence-building measures that can be taken by all sides, that improve the prospects of a successful negotiation. And I've discussed some of those privately with the prime minister. When President Abbas was here, I discussed some of those same issues with him.

I think it's very important that the Palestinians not look for excuses for incitement, that they are not engaging in provocative language; that at the international level, they are maintaining a constructive tone as opposed to looking for opportunities to embarrass Israel.

At the same time, I've said to Prime Minister Netanyahu --I don't think he minds me sharing it publicly - that, you know, Abu Mazen working with Fayyad have done some very significant things, when it comes to the security front. And so us being able to widen the scope of their responsibilities, in the West Bank, is something that I think would be very meaningful to the Palestinian people.

I think that some of the steps that have already been taken in Gaza help to build confidence. And if we continue to make progress on that front, then Palestinians can see in very concrete terms what peace can bring that rhetoric and violence cannot bring.

And that is people actually having an opportunity to raise their children and make a living and, you know, buy and sell goods and build a life for themselves, which is ultimately what people in both Israel and the Palestinian territories want, so.

PM Netanyahu: I think the latest sanctions adopted by the U.N. create illegitimacy or create delegitimization for Iran's nuclear program. And that is important. I think the sanctions the President signed the other day actually have teeth. They bite. The question is, how much do you need to bite, is something I cannot answer now. But if other nations adopted similar sanctions, that would increase the effect.

The more like-mined countries join in the American-led effort that President Obama has signed into act - into law, I think, the better we'll be able to give you an answer to your question.


Q: ( Israeli journalist) Mr. President, in the past year, you distanced yourself from Israel and gave a cold shoulder to the prime minister. Do you think this policy was a mistake? Do you think it contributes to the bashing of Israel by others? And because of the changes now, do you trust Prime Minister Netanyahu?

And if I may, Mr. Prime Minister, specifically, did you discuss with the President a continuing of the building of settlements after September? And did you tell him that you're going to keep on building after this period is over?

President Obama: Well, let me, first of all, say that the premise to your question was wrong, and I entirely disagree with it. If you look at every public statement that I've made over the last year and a half, it has been a constant reaffirmation of the special relationship between the United States and Israel; that our commitment to Israel's security has been unwavering. And in fact, there aren't any concrete policies that you could point to that would contradict that.

And in terms of my relationship with Prime Minister Netanyahu, I know the press, both in Israel and Stateside, enjoys, you know, seeing if there's news there. But the fact of the matter is, is that I've trusted Prime Minister Netanyahu since I met him before I was elected President, and have said so both publicly and privately. I think that he is dealing with a very complex situation in a very tough neighborhood.

And you know, what I have consistently shared with him is my interest in working with him, not at cross-purposes, so that we can achieve the kind of peace that will ensure Israel's security for decades to come.

And that's going to mean some tough choices, and there are going to be times where, you know, he and I are having robust discussions about what kind of choices need to be made. But the underlying approach never changes, and that is, the United States is committed to Israel's security, we are committed to that special bond, and we are going to do what's required to back that up, not just with words but with actions.

We are going to continually work with the prime minister and the entire Israeli government, as well as the Israeli people, so that we can achieve what I think has to be everybody's goal, which is that people feel secure. They don't feel like a rocket's going to be landing on their head sometime. They don't feel as if there's a growing population that wants to direct violence against Israel. That requires work, and that requires some difficult choices and both at the strategic level and the tactical level. And this is something that the prime minister understands and why I think that we're going to be able to work together not just over the next few months but hopefully over the next several years.

PM Netanyahu: Thank you.

The President and I discussed concrete steps that could be done now, with the coming days and the coming weeks, to move the peace process further along in a very robust way. This is what we focused our conversation on. And when I say the next few weeks, that's what I mean, and the President means that too.

Let me make a general observation about the question you forwarded to the President - and here I'll have to paraphrase Mark Twain - that the reports about the demise of the special U.S.-Israel relationship aren't just premature: They're just flat wrong.

There is a depth and richness of this relationship that is expressed every day our teams talk. We don't make it public. The only thing that's public is that you can have differences, on occasion, in the best of families and the closest of families. That comes out public, and sometimes in a twisted way, too.

What is (natural ?) is the fact that we have an enduring bond of values, interests, beginning with security and the way that we share both information and other things to help the common defense of our common interests and many others in the region who don't often admit to the beneficial effect of this cooperation.

So I think there's a - the President said it best in his speech in Cairo. In front of the entire Islamic world, he said: The bond between Israel and the United States is unbreakable. And I can affirm that to you today.

President Obama: Thank you very much, everybody.



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Justice Kennedy Says Will Wait Until Obama Leaves To Retire

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who turns 74 this month, has reportedly told a number of people that he will stay on the Court for at least three more years, through the end of Obama's first term.

This is significant, because Kennedy has morphed from a swing vote that could go either way into a fairly reliable fifth vote for the court's conservative and originalist wing. If Obama is a one-term president and Kennedy retires after a conservative Republican is elected, a conservative justice could be named to cement that 5-4 majority firmly in place.

With a little bit of luck, the two Clinton appointees, Justices Stephen Breyer(72) and Ruth Bader Ginsberg (77) will hang around long enough to give way to originalist justices as well. Or at least long enough for the midterms, when Obama's radical nominees would hopefully be unlikely to be confirmed by the Senate.


please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

The Netanyahu /Obama Meeting

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8K531S3cXUt_DRDls4cZ8bD3y_H3-RvzcYdHd8BveDpQ2P37pc4HrdK4pQNBwazxfGzbeY03vk96LEsoaZ-Zpyu8ViDPaUFtY7K0NwWRSKw29QNPJK-d9OFsOb0ssmGuWRXf7lA/s320/obama-netanyahu-300x200.jpg

Today's meeting between Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu and President Barack Hussein Obama is scheduled for the White House today, and it will likely be very different from their previous meetings, when Netanyahu was shuttled in to the White House via the back entrance and treated like a particularly unsavory third world dictator.

No matter what goes on behind closed doors,both men have a vested interest in at least the appearance of a good and cordial meeting.

President Obama is looking to the coming midterm elections and wants to dial down the public perception of non-support and undue pressure on Israel. Although Jews as a group continue to identify with the Democratic Party,the rift created by the Obama Administration between the US and Israel has already resulted in a lessening of Jewish support for the administration and for Democratic congressional candidates. And items like 54 Democrats signing a letter to the White House in support of Hamas haven't helped.

Netanyahu likewise wants the appearance of an amiable meeting for domestic consumption in Israel, especially among the Israeli media. And a demonstration of US support could also be helpful in warding off some of the diplomatic assault on Israel.

Expect smiles, handshakes, lotsa photos and some cliched statements on the closeness of US-Israel ties...simply because it's to both parties advantage.

What will go on behind close doors is going to be very different.

Obama will continue to push Netanyahu to make further unilateral concessions to the Palestinians, and at the very least will try to get Netanyahu to extend the temporary building freeze indefinitely that Netanyahu unwisely agreed to past its end in September.

He may also press Netanyahu to put a division of Jerusalem on the table.

Netanyahu will have to figure out some way to play for time on this issue. After his assurances to the other members of his coalition, caving in on this could very well cause his government to fall.

Obama's priority is to get concrete concessions out of Israel in order to bribe Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinians to enter direct talks. Netanyahu has repeatedly said that he wants direct talks without preconditions, while Abbas has insisted on getting an Israeli commitment to certain concessions before he negotiates.

Given his limited public support among Palestinians, what Abbas can actually deliver even if he does come to the table is an open question the Obama administration would rather not address.But the process is considered all important.

The rift between Turkey and Israel may also be on the table. The Turks have stated that they plan to sever all ties with Israel unless they get a formal apology and compensation out of Israel for the May 31st attempt by a Turkish flotilla to run the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza in which nine Turkish citizens were killed when they attacked IDF soldiers attempting to board the ship.

While the Israelis have refused to apologize for defending themselves and ruled out the Obama Administration would very much like to see the rift between Turkey and Israel healed and may very well try to pressure Netanyahu on this issue.

The President and PM Netanyahu will also likely discuss Iran. With even Administration analysts like Leon Panetta admitting that Iran will likely have a nuclear bomb in less than two years, it's an issue on which the US and Israel should be in lockstep.

However, Obama is unlikely to give much to Israel here. He will probably bluntly tell Netanyahu that even if the belated sanctions fail to have an effect, the US will not support Israel if it acts alone.

Netanyahu is in the unenviable position of having to play for time against what is essentially a hostile American administration. If he allows himself to be intimidated into making concession after concession without any realistic return, it will only be the beginning of a whole series of additional demands.

Fortunately, Congress and the American people still largely support Israel, and Netanyahu is in a strong position to avoid giving away the store,provided he does it gracefully and explains his positions.

The planned photo-op happy talk nature of this particular meeting will likely help as well, since Obama is unlikely to press too hard on this particular occasion.

-Selah -

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Monday, July 05, 2010

How Obama Kills Jobs

Analyzing last month's jobs report reveals pretty clearly that President Barack Hussein Obama's policies kill jobs and stifle growth.

Here's an example of how this works at street level.


Lots of you know and love the product put out by White Castle Hamburgers, a culinery treat enjoyed by millions. But thanks to ObamaCare and the president's new tax policies, that treat might very well be a thing of the past.

The Columbus, Ohio based family owned chain says that their projections are that just a single provision in the bill will eat up about 55 percent of its yearly net income after 2014,when the provisions fully kick in.

That year, the bill levies a $3,000-per-employee penalty on companies whose workers pay more than 9.5 percent of their household income in premiums for company-provided insurance.

White Castle now provides insurance to all of its full-time workers and picks up between 70 to 89 percent of their premium costs, and they're going to be hit for those penalties. That will make it questionable whether the company can even afford to maintain its 421 restaurants - and forget about creating any new jobs or expanding. As of today, the company employs over 10,000 people nationwide, and more than 1,200 in its home state of Ohio.

Faced with this kind of piracy, they will simply go Galt and go out of business , radically raise their prices and cut back on growth or simply sell out.

And that's the effect on one firm from just one of President Obama's policies.

As I said back during the campaign, when Obama get's through with you, you'd better hope you have any spare change left.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Israel's 'Peace Partner' Abbas Eulogizes Munich Massacre Mastermind

http://australiansforpalestine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/46700383_b67ca0ff8e.jpg

It's important to remember that Abbas, Arafat's right hand man was the paymaster for the Munich 'operation.'

Less than a month after the PA's capo del tutti and unelected dictator Mahmoud Abbas told gullible American Jewish leaders that he was going to work harder at ending Palestinian incitement and glorification of terrorism, guess what? There he is eulogizing Abu Dauod the recently deceased 'commander' of the 1972 Munich terrorist raid that murdered 11 unarmed Israeli Olympic athletes they were holding.

“He is missed. He was one of the leading figures of Fatah and spent his life in resistance and sincere work as well as physical sacrifice for his people's just causes,” said Abbas.

'Resistance and sincere work'...rest assured, that is exactly how Mahmoud Abbas sees what happened at Munich. Munich, and a thousand other atrocities the Palestinians continue to indoctrinate the next generation with as heroic and holy deeds to be emulated by them against the hated yahood.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Presbyterian Church's Middle East Study - Too Anti-Semitic Even For J-Street

The Presbyterian Church establishment has never made any secret about its disdain for Israel - in direct conflict with the Scripture they claim to be based on.

The church's Middle East Study Committee Report currently under consideration for the PC(USA)’s General Assembly in support of divestment recently came under criticism from one if the Jewish groups it cites in the report’s introductory “Letter to our American Jewish Friends”....none other than our old friends, J-Street:

Rachel Lerner, vice president of J Street, spoke at a breakfast held at the Hyatt in Minneapolis a few blocks away from the convention center where the PC(USA)‘s General Assembly is taking place. The breakfast was organized by Presbyterians for Middle East Peace, a group calling on the General Assembly to reject the MESC report.

Lerner said “Supporting a Palestinian state does not, should not, and cannot mean tearing down Israel.”

She described the report as so one-sided that even J Street activists would not want to partner with the PC(USA) in its peacemaking activism if the report were to be approved “because it will push them into a corner a force them into a defensive stance.”

However, in true J-Street form, she denied that the organization was going to do anything concrete about it.

"I want to be very clear about this -- this is not meant to be a threat. If this is passed we will not be issuing a directive to our locals that they cannot partner with local Presbyterian churches -- but with the passage of this study, the Church will alienate us and as a result our activists will not want to work with you and this will damage completely the possibility of a future relationship.”

This is in line with the organization's removal of the pro-Israel part of its 'pro-Israel, pro-peace' slogan.

“I was, to be perfectly honest -- surprised and saddened and to be very, very honest, sometimes even angered by what I read,” Lerner said.

“When I read the proposed study document, I felt myself moving into a self-protective position. I was truly so disturbed by what I was reading -- unable to find a familiar or even a just a balanced narrative in these pages, I found myself using language I don’t normally use, clinging to defensive positions, which surprised me, to be honest.”

Why are you surprised? Did J Street actually believe that anti-Israel doesn't equal anti-Semitic? Did they really fail to realize that the Islamist/Left alliance that funds them, in the last analysis, simply want Israel gone? Did they really think that J-Street was being used as anything but a smokescreen for that?

Yes...they probably did. Not only are they treasonous,cowardly self-hating little scumbags worthy of Dante's lowest circle of Hell, but they're clueless as well. I doubt this will be a wake up call, but such epiphanies are always possible.

Lenin's phrase 'useful idiots' comes to mind.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Congressional Candidate Lt. Col. Allen West's Fourth Of July Message



You've read what I've had to say about this American hero before. He's a highly decorated war hero whose awards and decorations include the Bronze Star, Meritorious Service Medal (two Oak Leaf Clusters), Army Commendation Medal (two Oak Leaf Clusters, one Valor Device), Army Achievement Medal (one Oak Leaf Cluster), Valorous Unit Award, Air Assault Badge and the Parachutist Badge.

He also has some refreshing and unique views on national defense, Israel and the actual war we're engaged in that make me wish I lived in Florida just so I could work on his campaign and help him get elected.

This is someone we badly need in Congress. If you care about the future direction of this country, send him some love and money.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XUgVG0caFyo/SkPZbjvOJ7I/AAAAAAAAGAA/uXjv_-CmT0Y/s320/allenwest_hero.jpg



please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Biden Says Iraqis Ready To Take Over - As Mortars And Suicide Bombers Hit

http://images.politico.com/global/news/100705_biden_iraq_smile_ap_218.jpg

Vice President Joe Biden was in Iraq over the Fourth of July and said in an interview with NBC News during hi strip that the Iraqis are “absolutely” ready to take over full responsibility for security as the U.S. proceeds with a planned withdrawal.

“They are ready. Absolutely they’re ready to take over,” Biden said.

Ironically, the US Embassy compound in Baghdad's 'Green Zone' was hit with mortar fire while the Bidens were inside, and two "duck and cover" alarms sounded within an hour.

As a side note, that 100-acre embassy cost th eAmerican taxpayer $700 million, and is the largest U.S. embassy in the world.

Also occurring during Biden's trip was a particularly nasty suicide bombing in Anbar, when a female bomber managed to get through four checkpoints and blew herself up in the reception area of the provincial governor's office in Ramadi. At least five people were killed and scores wounded.

There have been numerous attacks since the disputed Iraqi elections, a sign that tensions between the Sunni and Shiite factions are ramping up.

What we essentially have established in Iraq is a Shiite Islamic Republic with it's laws and constitution based on sharia. The latest election, which saw Iraqi PM Maliki using his muscle to arbitrarily disqualify winning candidates from the opposing parties does not bode well for a peaceful and democratic future there.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

Steele Trying To Contain Fallout From Afghanistan Remarks

Good luck with that.

I'll again reiterate what this buffoon had to say:


"Keep in mind again, federal candidates, this was a war of Obama's choosing. This was not something that the United States had actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in.

But it was the president who was trying to be cute by half by building a script demonizing Iraq, while saying the battle really should be in Afghanistan. Well, if he is such a student of history, has he not understood that you know that's the one thing you don't do, is engage in a land war in Afghanistan?"


I particularly liked Jim Demint on this - "This is America's war. It's not Obama's war."

After all, there's no sense aping the way the Democrats acted towards President Bush over Iraq. And that includes the present occupant of the White House.

Steele apparently lacks the grace to resign voluntarily, so he's going to have to be pushed out. The sooner, the better.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!