Monday, September 18, 2006

Should the Pope have kept his mouth shut?









What is more surprising to me than the current Islamic violence directed against the Pope and Christianity is the reaction to it by the west.

Rather than aggressively defending the Pontiff's right to speak his mind and forcefully condemning the Muslim attempts at intimidation, a lot of western reaction seems to range from puzzlement to condemnation based on the fact that Pope Benedict `should have known better' or that the Catholic Church, with it's history, has no place to criticize Islam.

Obviously,anyone who has difficulty understanding the violent Muslim reaction to the Pope simply hasn't been paying attention. We can let that sort of cluelessness lie in the mud where it belongs.

But other coments I've heard - that Pope Benedict should have avoided comments he knew would antagonize Muslims and that the Catholic Church has no right to criticize Islam - bear a little in depth examination.

Just why should Pope Benedict have kept his papal trap shut?

Either we are a free society, or we aren't, and the Pope, like anyone else has the right to speak his mind without having to worry about death threats. The fact is, the Pope's remarks were totally taken out of context and distorted, much like the famous MoToons with the same purpose in mind....orchestrating violence aimed at intimidating anyone remotely critical of Islam or Islamic jihad.

As for the idea that Pope Benedict, as head of the Catholic Church had no right to criticize Islam because of the Church's history, that is ridiculous PC speech that is wrong both factually and historically.

The easy way to flush such arguments is to simply point out that we are speaking of modern times, not the 14th Century, and that the Pope's remarks were directed at the world situation today. What's more, the Catholic Church has attempted to deal with its history through Vatican II, numerous statements and as recently as last year. the mass held last year by Pope John Paul II in which he expressly apologized and did penitence for the Church's misdeeds. Cardinal Ratzinger, the present Pope had a major hand in all these developments.

I have yet to hear of substantial numbers of Muslim clerics and scholars taking responsibility for the violence done in the name of Islam...which continues in our present day, unabated. If anything the reverse has been true!

What's more, if one takes a look at the events frequently cited as evidence of the Catholic Churches' `evil' - the Inquisition, the Crusades, and the Counter reformation - one finds that the death toll of these events, compared with the Islamic conquests, the sack of Byzantium, the jihad against India and the Islamic invasion of Southern Europe, not to mention the body count of the modern Islamic war against the west are miniscule. And in Islam's case, the carnage is still going on.

Islam was spread, from Day One, almost exclusively by the sword. That's how Mohammed designed it, and nothing has changed.

So what does this mean for us in the west?

Islam, as it's constituted today is not compatible with what we would consider freedom and democracy in the West.

That's why President Bush's vaunted `Arab Democracy' policy is such a miserable failure.

These violent outbursts, like the MoToon riots and the Qu'ran flushing riots are deliberately orchestrated and designed by the Muslim clerics, leaders and jihadists with the idea of intimidating anyone who points out the inconvenient truth...as a way of softening up the west for jihad and conquest.

CAIR's army of lawyers serves the same goal.

The question is, what are we prepared to do about it?

4 comments:

nazar said...

"That's why President Bush's vaunted 'Arab Democracy' policy is such a miserable failure"

But didn't you say before that we should seperate Kurdistan from Iraq because it's the most capable of democracy?

The question we have to ask ourselves is if there is an American trying to get out of every Iraqi.

Freedom Fighter said...

Actually, I didn't say we should `seperate Kurdistan because it's the most capable of democracy'. I said we should allow the Kurds to seperate because they are the only true allies we have inthe region, and that would provide a secure base for us.


The Kurds are not Arabs, and have an entirely different tradition and history anyway.

And because they are who they are, they have a vested interest in being allies of the west.

ff

louielouie said...

er ah, they have always been allies of the west.
the west has just continually sold them down the river.

Anonymous said...

So the Pope quotes an Emporer who,in the 14th century, accused Muslims of being violent and Muslims in the 21st century promptly prove him right.