Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Animal Bordellos - yep! or should I say yip!!!

a Danish animal owner offers his horse to a Danish journalist claiming to be interested in animal sex.

Warning: You might want to skip this if you're sensitive. Or enjoy Danish dairy, bacon or ham.

Okay, a cut below what's usually onsite here, but I found this interesting, in terms of the culture Scandanavia, where gay marriage is legal, so is bestiality. And why not? Isn't it just another `life choice'?

From there it's only a hop skip and a jump to Animal bordellos .

Apparently, there is a large - er- market in animal bordellos in Denmark that draw foreign clientle, including many from Norway, where this article originated. Both countries have loopholes in the laws that make such establishments perfectly legal.

The one prohibition either Denmark nor Norway on sex with animals is that the animals do not suffer.

I suppose it all comes down to your definition of suffering...

On the Internet, Danish animal owners advertise openly that they have sex with animals for sale, and it's pefectly legal, so there's no intervention from police or other authorities, Danish newspaper 24timer reports.

In interviewing the animal owners, the newspaper was told that the animals involved have many years of experience and that the animals themselves wanted sex. The cost to the client varied from DKK 500-1,000 (about $85-$170 American).

What I want to know is, who asked the animals if they wanted sex with humans? And did the animals talk back in Danish?

The Norwegian Food Safety Authority's section chief for animal welfare, Torunn Knævelsrud, could not rule out that such a bordello could be legal in Norway as well.

"It is difficult to say yes or no," Knævelsrud told Aftenposten.

As long as the basics like shelter, feed and care are in place, and there's no evidence of injury or suffering to the animal, an animal bordello is pefectly legal in both Denmark and Norway under existing Norwegian law.

Incidentally, Norway is one of those enlightened countries where shehita - Kosher ritual slaughtering - is outlawed becaused of `cruelty'!

"It could be that the animals don't really care," Knævelsrud said. "But I think it is in the nature of the case that animals will often be victims of injury, stress or suffering in connection with sexual acts with humans. Either that they are held fast, or frightened, or suffer pain or physical injury," Knævelsrud said.

A new Norwegian Animal Protection Act is being considered, and there have been proposals from the Norwegian Animal Welfare Alliance among others, that sexual intercourse with animals be forbidden.

"The acts provoke moral disgust. The question is whether immorality should be made illegal. The FSA group discussing the new animal protection act has been in disagreement about this," Knævelsrud said.

According to the Danish 24timer report, Germans, Dutchmen, Swedes and Norwegians visit the Danish bordellos, and a web site devoted to bestiality claimed that many of Denmark's animal sex clients stem from Norway.

A farmer who sells animal sex said he is extremely surprised that foreigners are ready to travel so far for it.

"But the clients tell us that it is much simpler to buy animal sex in Denmark than in their own country," a horse owner from Nord-Jylland told the newspaper.

A new report from the Institute of Criminology at the University of Oslo showed that Norwegian veterinarians are aware of at least 124 cases of animal sex abuse in Norway. The paper reports that 22 percent of Norwegian veterinarians suspect or are sure that they have treated animals that have been sexually abused by humans.

I am NEVER eating anything originating in Scandanavia again. Period!


Freedom Fighter said...

Hi Nazar,
Love the `pseudo-redneck' dialect accent..which shows YOU might not be as liberal and free from prejudice as you think you are!

BTW, I imagine that at least half of the animal bordello customers are not homosexual, so I don't know where your `gay' remark comnes from, unless you are trying to imply that you feel I am anti-Homosexual. Considering the stories I've run onsite about gays being targeted for death in Iran, Iraq and the Palestinian areas, I find that to be a large stretch on your part, to say the least.

Just for the record, I have no problem with consenting adults jumping each others' bones as they see fit, provided they're reasonably discreet about it (which includes hetero-sexuals as well, I might add) but I DO have a problem with legalizing homosexual marriage and officially sanctioning it - because ultimately, it leads to behaviour like the above...and because it ultimately damages society, particularly when it is under attack from without, as western society is today.

A successful society is built on the family, and on birthrates that succesfully replenish its citizens. Does legalizing gay marriage help or hinder those trends?

Think about it.

Thanks, as always, for dropping by...


Anonymous said...

this is ff blog and will print/offer as he sees fit.

with that said, if i could find nazar's comments regarding this blog and domestic topics i would plagarize it here, with slight modifications.

you've had your jerry springer essay for the year ff.
get back to work/blogging.

Freedom Fighter said...

Hi Louie...
Yeah, you're right. What can I say? I was trying to be light and funny more than anything else.


Hi Nazar,
Whooo, you're in a mood today!

No big deal, but I do kind of take it amiss a bit to be told what I am and what I'm not merely because I make a point about what legalizing gay marriage does to society as a whole.

I think that is a perfectly acceptable POV that does not compromise the rights of homosexuals to live in peace in the slightest.

If you can't see that, we can certainly agree to disagree...but I might point out that one of the reasons Europe imported Muslims wholesale as immigrants was because of the huge bills to pay for the welfare state, coupled with a declining birth rate.

The same dichotomy is due to hit the US re: Social Security and Medicare as the baby boomers retire and has a bit to do with the problem of illegal immigration in the US. I made the point before that the huge rise in illegal immigration coincided with Roe V Wade: J O S H U A P U N D I T: The Immigrant Song: the USA, abortion and the debate on illegal immigration

Read it and let me know your thoughts.

I don't think the legalization of homosexual marriage, bestiality and in some European countries, polygamy and polyandry coupled with the above facts is merely a coincidence, in my opinion.

Successful societies are built on families, and on reproducing enough productive citizens to keep them going.

I'm afraid I still stand by the fact that the legal acceptance of the practices we're discussing tend to weaken the family, and thus society as a whole.

And BTW, keep in mind that I never specified the sex of the animals involved (lol!).

For what it's worth, this is a mere side issue and I apologize for hitting one of your hot buttons.

Mea Culpa.


Anonymous said...

Speaking of torture, Bush got his way again. It is now legal for the US to torture prisoners of war. Instead of reinterpreting the Geneva Convention, they simply do not cite it as a legal defense strategy for any prisoners seeking legal council. The American people again have blood on their hands from this war monger hateful son-of a bitch an bastard dogfucking cock sucking fucken idiot. Cheers USA !!! You are so smart.

So fuck a horse and go to jail, torture a prisoner, and win a prize.

Freedom Fighter said...

You know, anonymous, I'm not sure which is more appalling..the paucity of your thought or the poverty of your vocabulary.

I will only point out that (a) I'm certain your definition of torture and congress and President Bush's are quite different (b) The sole purpose of the Geneva Convention among civilized nations was to provide a civilized guarantee and a quid pro quo of treatment for prisoners on both sides, something that Americans, Russians and Brits who were POWs of the Nazis, Japanese, North Koreans, North Vietnamese, Hezbollah and Saddam will tell you was absolutely worthless in those cases and (c)For a bunch of warmongers with blood on our hands, we're behaving with amazing the detriment of our winning this war.

By the way, assuming you're European, congratulations for being able to successfully shelter behind the US armed forces and take advantage of the bravery of these war mongering blood suckers to avoid defending yourselves.

You're quite welcome.

Anonymous said...