Friday, September 09, 2011

Pigs Fly - The New York Times Has A Fair And Favorable Article On Sarah Palin

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEghgeVWW86U2_mmIql94RRykxbrpiMNr-rNRAgpU4sMco27w9jnxpI1oryJRHbQN84Y5VEjiQYnN0EAd6k-GwVpfvt-nTd1GWyhGm42NBW3uO8BuJ1OPUX95A4OFoZwiNLPkdYh/s1600/pigs_fly.jpg

Yes indeed..one of the writers at Pravda-on-the-Hudson thinks that Governor Palin's ideas are actually worth taking seriously....that they could even lead to a brand new political alignment.

Of course, those of us more familiar with Governor Palin have known that for quite some time.

please donate...it helps me write more gooder!

3 comments:

louielouie said...

this was solely for them to say "see, we aren't biased in the least".
next.

Anonymous said...

I like the cut of her jib ! When she differentiated dicrotically between the ' megacorporations ' & the ' good ' businesses ', ( sc, the small, entrepreneurial ones which ' take risks & sink & swim in the churning market ', ) I just wanted to hug her ! As she comments, 70 per cent ( % ) of job creation is in small business.

& I relish that paenultimate paragraph wherein ' Goldman Sachs, the Teamsters Union, General Electric, Google & the US Department Of Education ' are catalogued into the same category as ' remote ' & ' anonymous ' & ' becom[ing] corrupt & unresponsive '.

Perhaps, maybe, the NYT are hedging their bets a wee bit by publishing this, & they might be strongly hinting to their Democratic allies, elbowing them awake, that this is precisely the sort of & kind of populism which they should be engaging in if they do not wish to strike an electoral iceberg in 2012.

--dragon/dinosaur

Rob said...

Hi Louie,
IMO the real message was 'we don't think she's running for president,and therefore she's no longer a threat to Obama.'