Back when Barack Obama and the Democrats first began targeting Rush Limbaugh, I made this prediction:
As for the Democrats, their demonizing Rush Limbaugh is something that must make El Rushbo absolutely chortle in glee. I first started listening to him back when Bil Clinton and his cohorts were trashing him out of sheer curiosity to see what all the fuss was about. Now that he's once again the subject of a concerted attack by the Left, so will a lot of other people.
Turns out I was right on the money as usual...
Rush Limbaugh says attacks on him by democrats have “backfired.” The proof is in the new PPM data from several large markets. “These audience growth rates are phenomenal,” he says. Limbaugh's show has seen cume and share gains in every PPM market. ( from Inside Radio )
And there's this ....
A combination of several powerful forces has resulted in explosive talk radio ratings growth, with indications of much more to come in the months ahead.( from The Radio Factor)
Primary factor driving the upward move? You guessed it: Rush Limbaugh. That's in contrast to declining support for Rush's arch-rival Obama.
With Limbaugh at the top of his game, including a more deeply loyal audience than ever, the numbers were expected to be strong. The beginning of the Obamist era, combined with a direct White House campaign targeting the talk titan, however, provided rocket fuel for El Rushbo's ratings. Even to seasoned industry veterans, this data should prove stunning.
Finally, implementation of the new, far more accurate electronic Portable People Meter (PPM) ratings system has benefited talk radio, as the manual diary-based "phantom cume" problems of the past disappear. For years, programmers complained that the old system cost them listenership and are now armed with the proof they'd long sought.
That may be why Obama and his supporters have fought implementation of PPM, as we originally reported in October of last year.
While these numbers reflect February's results, they could go even higher in March, as the White House anti-Rush effort was still in high gear going into this month.
Some specifics:
In New York City, WABC has experienced huge gains during Rush's noon- 3pm timeslot: from 4.6 to 6.7 overall (12 and older) share, good for first place overall in the nation's largest market. Rush's Big Apple listenership is now estimated at 693,000.
In the second-largest market, Los Angeles, KFI-AM has surged into the number one position (all listeners 12 and older) from 9am to noon, with 618,000 listeners, a 4.6 to 6.0 audience share increase over three months and an even bigger males 35-64 (4.6 to 6.3) move, to take first place there as well.
Chicago, saw another huge move, with Rush affiliate WLS also taking first place during his timeslot (12 and older), from 5.2 share to 6.9 and a total local listenership of 396,700 in the third-largest market.
KSFO / San Francisco saw similar results, despite the extreme-left bent of the Bay Area: 4.7 to 6.0 share, now ranking second overall and with men aged 35-64. Total audience: 346,000.
In Dallas - Fort Worth, 4.8 to 6.4 men 35-64 and fourth overall (12+), 3.5 to 4.5. Cumulative audience: 250,000.
Houston's results were truly blockbuster: 6.0 to 9.8 overall, ranking number one with a bullet and audience of 382,300. Men 35-64: number one again, from 8.6 to 12.2 over three months. Adults 25-54: first place, 4.6 to 8.7. Women 25-54: 3.7 to 8.3 again good for a top ranking.
DC's WMAL also saw Rush-related growth: 4.1 to 6.7, good for third overall and an audience of 155,300. Men 35-64: number one with a staggering 6.4 to 13.4 move.
In Atlanta, Rush has helped WGST fend off an enormous competitor, WSB-AM, with a similar 4.0 to 6.2 upward move, good for fifth place overall and a total audience of 473,500. The results are better in the male 35-64 demographic, surging from 5.5 to 8.0 share.
Bucking Detroit's recent Democratic voting trend, Rush's performance on WJR-AM has been more significant than ever, moving into first place with a 5.8 to 9.6 jump. Men 35-64: number one and 11.6 share. Total audience: 253,000.
Given this blockbuster data, will the White House think twice before targeting Rush again?
Keep in mind that these numbers don't even include Limbaugh's strongest markets, medium-sized cities such as Reno, Albuquerque, Boise, Fresno, Bakersfield and hundreds of others where his program dominates local radio.
UPDATE: Rush's surge has also led to overall, full-day gains at most of these stations, with WABC/ New York moving into fifth place overall, ahead of many music stations. That's its best showing in at least a year.
KSFO/ San Francisco also rose overall, grabbing sixth place, while WLS/ Chicago now ranks second, a stunning feat.
As I predicted, a lot of people who hadn't tuned in to Limbaugh previously are doing so now, just to see whether the White House has been telling the truth about him. And from the numbers, apparently they're sticking around, which means that they're eventually likely to realize that he knows what he's talking about..which is NOT good news for Obama and his pals.
Like I said, EL Rushbo Is laughing all the way to the bank...while getting the conservative message out there to a lot of people who might not have heard it otherwise.
6 comments:
while rush's numbers increase, his listeners go out and vote for nimrods and rinos.
I must say this does not imspire my confidence in the Democratic leadership who currently run things. These people control the House, the Senate with a virtual filibuster proof majority (its easy to pick off two or three squeamish Republicans), the courts, the government bureacracy including the CIA, FBI, IRS, the public education system of grades k-12, the professorships and the leadership of all of the elite univerisities, and the major news media outlets.
In other words, the Democrats control every thing of importance within decision making circles in America. They are faced with a situation in which the economy is struggling, the military is worn out, and the national debt is massive. With regards to the national debt this was the case even before team Obama and Congress piled on to it.
Faced with these massive problems, what do the Democrats do? They spend precious resources attacking an entertainer like Rush Limbaugh who has no power over any thing what so ever. This does not inspire confidence at all.
I agree, Louie, we've got to stop that. In their bid to get a conservative bogeyman to replace Bush, the Left must be careful not to pick fights they can't win. Rush has fended off commie attacks for years. Did they honestly believe that Comrade Teleprompter was going to succeed where they failed?
Jason,
Actually the left may very well win this time around. As pointed out in my previous post, the left controls pretty much all of the levers of power right now in the United States. All that is needed is some bogus criminal charge against Rush and off to jail he goes to spend the rest of his days. Also, the fairness doctrine could be reinstituted to "hush Rush" and all future Rush's that might come along.
Even if the defeat Rush silence him and send him to prison, this does nothing to solve the nation's problems. A much better approach to staying in power would be to fix the worn down military. As it is right now, the nation is extremely vunerable to foreign invasion. The left is only an invasion by Russia, China, Iran, Venezueal, or some combination of these countries away from losing their power right now. Valuable resources are being wasted on Rush Limbaugh that need to be used elsewhere.
B. Poster. You're comment that Rush "has no power over anything" reveals you as ignorant. Hopefully liberals like you will continue to underestimate Rush and others like him.
Anonymous,
I'm not a liberal. Perhaps if you read more of my posts here you would understand this. I would kindly suggest you read more of my posts here before you conclude I'm a liberal. I post here quite frequently. I don't think it would be very difficult to find them.
Rush is only an entertainer. I might even say he is a very good one. Michael Steele the RNC chairman tried to point this out. He was correct. I don't understand why he felt like he needed to apologize for what he said when it was and is true!!
Perhaps he apologized for calling Rush "mean" and "incendiary." For that, an apologzy would perhaps be necessary. Rush is no more or less mean or incendiary than any number of liberal talk commentators.
Like it or not liberals/leftists have complete control over American policy right now. The country faces some of the most dire challenges it has ever faced. I want the leftists/liberals to succeed in solving them. Wasting precious resources on a marginal figure like Rush Limbaugh does not inspire my confidence in these people.
Post a Comment