Sunday, February 08, 2009

Obama's Bringing Hamas To America..On Our Dime


Apparently President Hope n'Change is lying through his pearly whites about our economy being in crisis.

Our president just signed an executive order appropriating $20.3 million of your tax dollars for `migration assistance to the Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.' It was signed on January 27th and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4th.

This is designed to allow hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to resettle in the United States,the same people who voted Hamas into power en masse. And I'll guarantee you that a number of Hamas operatives will slip in as part of the group. The order not only provides free airplane tickets but provides for food and housing allowances, something no other immigrants get.

President Obama's decision, according to the Register, was necessitated by "the urgent refugee and migration needs of the victims" and he considers this "in the national interest."

Not one major media outlet is publicizing this.

We will see more of this... because part of Obama's strategy involves pandering to the Muslim world and importing the sort of immigrants who will fundamentally change the electorate.

Oh, here's something else we'll be seeing a lot more. I hope the 78% of American Jews who voted for President Obama take note..not only is the enemy now inside the gates, but you cast your ballots for someone with an agenda of increasing their numbers.

In the end, what matters is not whether Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim or not,but what he's prepared to do to appease them.

And at who's expense.


UPDATE: A certain internet commentator who will be nameless (because I appreciate much of her work) is putting out the idea that this is just financial aid to Gaza, rather than immigration assistance. I would point out that President Obama's executive order clearly makes reference to migration aid.

And given the general attitude and probable goals of this White House, I have no doubt that's exactly what it's going to be used for. Nor should anyone else.



17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Complete insanity in DC-land. & why would 78 % ( per cent ) of American Jews vote for Obama? ( I ask as a pro-Israel Non-Jew. )

Freedom Fighter said...

This may provide something of an answer.

Other points to consider include the fact that the media went outof its way to conceal Obama's ties with Jew haters..and the fact that there are a number of Jews who's religion is actually leftist politics and who are only now discovering that what happens in Israel has a real bearing on their comfortable lives here.

Of course, I believe that's true for the west in general..

B.Poster said...

This is the wrong way to handle this problem. These "Palestinians" are a huge danger to America even an existential one. The reality is the collective strength of America's enemies is far stronger than America is. The economic and military damage the "Palestinians" can and would inflict on America is far greater than the 20.3 million they are being given.

What the Obama administration hopes to do is to buy off an enemy that is more powerful than America is. This is really no different than the ransoms paid to kidnappers and other purveyors of black mail. This has never worked and it will not work now.

Optimially America should "reset the military" as Senator McCain once described it as. Essentially the United States military is worn down from its continued operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere in "Global War on Terrorism." As such, the American military is no longer in a position to be competitive with the likes of Russia, China, the Arabs or other American enemies. Ideally America should be placed on a war footing and the military should be rebuilt.

Unfortunately the optimal solution cannot be implemented now or in the foreseeable future. America has a massive national debt and a struggling economy. This makes the type of military build up that would be necessary to compete with the major world powers is simply not possible right now.

As such, America should seek to disengage entirely from the Middle East, secure its borders, and place an indefinite moratorium on immigration.

In addition to this, Aemrica should make more of an effort to present its position within the world media. Currently America's enemies have almost complete domination of the channels of information disemination. This will need to change.

Anonymous said...

Thank you. Succinctly & convincingly argued.

Anonymous said...

Iran will now have a whole new slew of humint in the USA now.

Anonymous said...

Oh and I wonder if any of these guys will allow their children to fight for freedom -in our armies alongside our soldiers and not against them.

Jewish Republican said...

Just for the record and even though it doesn't mean much, this American Jew most emphatically DID NOT for the Obama. I have had some pretty nasty arguments with my fellow congregants. Mostly the same ones who used to argue with me about Jimmy Carter, who we all now agree is an anti-Semitic SOB. I expect that these same people will shortly see the light, I just pray it will be not too late to save America.

Anonymous said...

I suppose in your case we can say IGNORANCE IS BLISS. You should go look up Presidential Determination #2005-23 dated May 13, 2005 and Signed by YOUR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT BUSH for $34.7 million under the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act to the West Bank, Gaza, Burundi and Democratic Congo.
Then again on May 10, 2007 Presidential Determination #2007-19
$29.5 million under the Same Act to Somalia,Sudan,Chad,West Bank and Gaza. Don't all of these countries have muslim extremists in them that wish death to us americans. If you would have done just a google search you to could have gotten the same information that I found. But the bottom line is that you would prefer to exaserbate the situation at hand and to misalign the current administration considering that this is one of the first administrations to have Jews holding numerous postions close to the president. Why were you not this outspoken when YOUR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT BUSH signed the exact same presidential determination. I can only guess and that would be it was in your best interest and racism is alive and well in the *United States* be it against Jews or Blacks. You should be ashamed of yourself I would have expected more from a fellow Jew.

Freedom Fighter said...

Yet another Anonymous apologist for Obama.

In the first place,IF you bothered to look at this site before shooting your electronic mouth off,you'd find that I've been extemely critical of Bush's pandering to the Muslim world.As if two wrongs make a right because Bush did it and now Obama does it?

As for it being the first Administration to have Jews 'holding positions close to the president',what difference does that make,even if it was true? ( It's not, BTW). Are you talking about Rahm Emanuel,Obama's chief of staff? George Bush had plenty of Jews in his administration - Josh Bolton, Scooter Libby, Doug Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Ari Fleischer...Ken Melman the head of the RNC...did it make him kiss up to the Saudis and CAIR any less?

Bush at least was quasi pro Israel for his first term untilhe realized that Lefty Jews like you weren't going to vote for a Republican regardless. Then he listened to James Baker and let Condo Rice go crazy and push around Olmert and Livni with obvious results.

You won't even get that much from Obama, trust me on that. He wants to appease the Muslim world by giving them Israel, in the guise of a 'peace process.' You'll find out.

Hopefully the Israelis won't cooperate in their own suicide, and we here in the US can elect some adults to Congress on 2010 to keep Obama's worst excesses in check.

Oh,and BTW,the word you want is 'malign' not 'misalign'. Your use of language is on a par with your critical thinking, I'm afraid.

You're welcome here, but do us both a favor and avoid commenting unless you have something intelligent to say.

And I'd watch playing the race card around here if I were you. You have absolutely no idea who you're talking to,and it adds to the impression that you're not the sharpest tool in the shed..

Regards,
Rob

Ymarsakar said...


And I'd watch playing the race card around here if I were you. You have absolutely no idea who you're talking to,and it adds to the impression that you're not the sharpest tool in the shed..


Since he is talking to himself so he can hear and see himself, of course he knows who he is talking to...

Ymarsakar said...

Link

There is the 2005 memo.

Now where's Obama's memo?

Freedom Fighter said...

The link to Obama's executive order is in the article.

Anothe rpoint I could have brought up is that in 2005, we weren't ina major recession ( not that it made bringing a bunch of potential jihadis here right).

In 2009, we are.

Regards,
Rob

Ymarsakar said...

That was a lot of legalese in PO's memo. Bush had it simpler and more cogent.

Bush also included refugees from a wide variety of areas, not just Arab-Muslim-Palestinian vote buying schemes.

Bush also stipulated that NGOs were to be involved, not international or governmental organizations. Giving money to Hamas and Hizbollah and Syria and Iran-Saudi Arabia is one thing. Giving it to Israeli charity organizations taking care of refugee problems... an entirely different aspect.

Anonymous said...

You are all a bunch of psychopathic SORE LOSERS. This whole article is patently false. Do the research. It is a total and complete fabrication. Paying for airline tickets and housing for Gazans to come to the U.S.??? FALSE!!!! The money is SOLELY for the purchase of food and medicine in Gaza. Read the Federal Registry and the Executive Order. LOSERS!!!

Freedom Fighter said...

Hello Anonymous 9:23 AM,
If I were you, I'd be very careful about the term 'sore losers'..remember the 2000 and 2004 elections and the collective temper tantrums people like you threw? Remember "he's not my president"? I do.

There is a direct link to the executive order in the article.Since it's apparently beyond you to look at it, here it is again:

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section
2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the ``Act''), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the
Act, that it is important to the national interest to
furnish assistance under the Act in an amount not to
exceed $20.3 million from the United States Emergency
Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international,
governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and
payment of administrative expenses of Bureau of
Population, Refugees, and Migration of the Department
of State, related to humanitarian needs of Palestinian
refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.


By the way, the Migration and Refugees Assistance Act of 1962 specifically refers to immigration assistance, and gives the president leeway to allocate funds for that purpose.

In short, I'm afraid you don't know what you're talking about.

I assume you approve of importing radical Muslims to America and you're OK with $20.3 million of your tax money going for this purpose during a recession - because it's Obama.

After just shy of a month in office, I have a pretty good idea of the president's goals and agenda.You and a great many other people who voted for him are going to find out quite a bit about the president in the next few months - and I have a feeling you're not going to like it.

Regards,
Rob

Ymarsakar said...

After just shy of a month in office, I have a pretty good idea of the president's goals and agenda.You and a great many other people who voted for him are going to find out quite a bit about the president in the next few months - and I have a feeling you're not going to like it.

like Michelle said, Obama will make you work.

He'll also make you like it and who better than Obama's dupes?

Egy Azziera said...

First off we would like to congratulate you on your fine public speaking skills. It looks like those who said the Obama Administration would strike while the iron is hot may have been correct, and the Administration may be doing it in a way that does not require them to even get a vote in Congress.